this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
453 points (98.7% liked)

Cyanide and Happiness

6064 readers
105 users here now

About

Hello fellow Cyanide and Happiness fans!

Cyanide & Happiness (C&H) is a webcomic created by Rob DenBleyker, Kris Wilson, Dave McElfatrick and Matt Melvin. The comic has been running since 2005 and is published on the website explosm.net along with animated shorts in the same style. Matt Melvin left C&H in 2014, and several other people have contributed to the comic and to the animated shorts

Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanide_%26_Happiness

Hope you enjoy and feel free to contribute to the community with art, media, cool stuff about the authors, tattoos, toys and anything else, as long it’s Cyanide & Happiness related!

History

@MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works started this community and wrote:

About this community and how I post the comics… Many moons ago, I would ask my Dad to save the newspaper for me everyday so I could read my favorite comic strips. Of course these days you can read your favorite comics online instead of a newspaper, but I love the nostalgia of reading the daily comics. Anyway, one of my favorite current comics is Cyanide and Happiness and I will be posting the daily release from their website (https://explosm.net/) and a an extra or two randoms.

Related Communities

Subscribe to all the daily comic communities!

Fine Print

All comics posted are freely available online. In no way is the poster claiming ownership, copyright or anything else. This is a not for profit community, we just want to enjoy our comics, thank you.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tinchs@lemm.ee 85 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Nachtnebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do people have a meme for every situation?

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

One must have 10 memes (in base 10).

[–] ViperActual@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

I'll admit, this took a few seconds and a reread to process correctly. Well played

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So i kinda went on a thought rabbit hole here

  1. I like jokes like this, in part because they only work in written form. Because if they were using base 10 they'd say "You're a ten", but base 2 would be "You're a one zero" (or one oh)

  2. Wait, do people actually say "ten" when expressing two in binary? Do they actually say "one, ten, eleven, one hundred, one hundred and one, one hundred and ten…"?

  3. Have I been expressing binary incorrectly?

  4. Am I overthinking this?

  5. Honestly though, my favorite written pun is "Religions are more interested in profits than prophets"

Anyway, puns are fun. How do you say binary numbers?

[–] amda@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People don't usually change the name of the number when working in different basis so you would in fact just say "ten". If the actual representation was important you would say "one, zero, one, zero". I don't think people would say one thousand and ten as the word thousand is more about the actual number than the string "1000".

You can use other round quantity when working on other basis, like a dozen or a gross in base twelve.

[–] wieson@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah but ten is the name for the concept of this many: iiiiiiiiii. Not for the symbols 1 and 0 in that order.

So if I said "that's ten", I would be looking at "1010"

If I were to send a "0010" over an interface as a test for example, I would say: "now I'm sending two. Are you recieving two?"

[–] Ketram@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Probably overthinking it (i hope). I usually say each binary digit individually, e.g. "one zero" for 10. Just makes more sense to me at least.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

You're not overthinking it at all and have hit upon an important point. The problem with "ten" is that it's too easily confused with 1010_2 or 0x0A_16. One-zero base 2 is unambiguous. Also one, ten, eleven etc would get very unwieldy very quickly, and as it already gets unwieldy very quickly even when just quoting digits, that's why we have hex and octal.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There are 10 types of people in the world, those that understand binary and those that don't.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And those who don't know this joke is in ternary.

[–] witchybitchy@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there are two kinds of people, those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

What's the other kind?

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

There are 10 types of people in the world: those that understand n-ary, those that confuse it with (n-1)-ary, those that confuse it with (n-2)-ary, ..., those that confuse it with ternary, those that confuse it with binary, and those that don't understand it at all.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

More like in base 1010 or base 10

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More like in base 10 or base 10

Exactly! And don't forget about hexadecimal aka base 10

[–] Pyro@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah I doubt non-programmers would catch that.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Every number system is base 10.

Binary is base 1+1.
Ternary is base 2+1.
Octal is base 7+1.
Decimal is base 9+1.
Duodecimal is base B+1.
Hexadecimal is base F+1.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[–] hazeydreams@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I like this alot.

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

pH, cause you basic.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Both work because the scale is 1-10. Binary just has fewer intermediate steps. Nobody is a binary 7.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The joke is binary 10 is 2. Vs base 10 of 10

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for the explanation! I've only been doing digital logic since 1976 so I'm still a bit confused by it.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No worries. I have a networking background so I'll never forget binary.

0 = 000
1 = 001
2 = 010
3 = 011 4 = 100

So 100 / 25 = 100 (4 in binary)

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Here's another neat one: 1010 / 101 = 10

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I like that one or 1012=ERROR

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think they're saying that on a binary 1 to 10 scale, the range is only (decimal) 2, so a 10/10 for binary is a 2/2 in decimal (where you can only be a 1/2 or 2/2), which is still the highest value.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering the artist I think the joke was 2/10 vs 10/10.
This isn't XKCD. Still to each their own.

I forwarded this to some network engineer friends and they got a kick out of it.

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh, definitely. The intended joke is out of 10 in decimal.

That's clear. I thought this joke didn't quite work because of the same reason, too.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] 843563115848z@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

I'm old. This started being a joke, to my knowledge, in the mid-1980s. I'm sure it predates that timeframe. Still a great joke though.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Split the difference, it's octal.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel I must explain the joke

1 is yes

0 is no