this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
36 points (95.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40808 readers
1169 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All ships actually are already in all Klein bottles.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

by a very specific definition of "inside"

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The specifics were already covered by the term "Klein bottle". Everything is inside all Klein bottles. You, me, and the universe.

[–] meekah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

All currently existing Klein bottles.

It seems obvious but I feel like specifying is necessary when talking about abstract things like 4d shapes.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Klein bottles have no inside, so no. Either that or everything is in every Klein bottle.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Either that or everything is in every Klein bottle.

That would still be a no because no ship can be put in a Klein bottle if every ship is already in the Klein bottle.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the ship would be put in the kline bottle upon the kline bottle's creation

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

All Klein bottles are inside all Klein bottles.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that's quite a valid statement. You could create a klein bottle that has an object locked into the void area. By the colloquial definition of "inside", the ship would be contained inside the bottle

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like Klein bottles are famously the exception to colloquial notions of "inside." Do Möbius strips have two sides because colloquially nothing has only one side?

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Mobius strips actually have two sides. The face and the edge. Both wrap around twice.

[–] Toes@ani.social 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well no, but actually yes.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

yesn't

for those who don't know what this is, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein_bottle and image

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'd ask the inverse. What definition of "inside" can you apply to a traditional bottle--so as to say that a ship is inside the bottle--that could not also be applied to a Klein bottle? Both of them have a single opening that leads to an enclosed, dead-ended volume.

A Klein bottle may only have one surface, and therefore you can argue it has no topological inside. But a traditional bottle is topologically equivalent to a flat disc, so the same logic would say you can't put a ship inside one of those either.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Once you put a cork in the neck of the bottle, it is no longer a disc and can contain other objects.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

True, but can't you cork a Klein bottle just as easily?

Ask Randall Monroe.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

No, you would have to make the bottle around the ship.

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, there's also this:

Can You Fill a Shape That Has No Inside? - The Action Lab

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdHd8yWyysE&ab_channel=TheActionLab

[–] TheButtonJustSpins 4 points 2 days ago
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This actually is a stupid question

[–] technopagan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, that's the whole idea of this community, isn't it?

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

If a question is structured such that it's unanswerable you've got a stupid question on your hands.

Everybody knows that "no stupid questions" means you're not supposed to be embarrassed by asking something you don't know.

But when you show up asking a specifically unanswerable question, you're just a troll. Yes a harmless troll but it's just trolling; it's just time wasting.

[–] theOneTrueSpoon@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

No. It says it right in the name. No Stupid Questions /s

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

No but you could project one onto its surface