this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
70 points (97.3% liked)

World News

46695 readers
1863 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prime Minister Mark Carney said he has had talks with Donald Trump about it. The defense system is designed to detect, track and potentially intercept incoming missiles.

Canada is conducting "high level" talks with the United States over joining Donald Trump's proposed "Golden Dome" missile defense program, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Wednesday.

Trump announced his plans the previous day to develop the multilayered, $175 billion (€155 billion) system with ground- and space-based capabilities that can defend against a wide range of enemy weapons, like drones, hypersonic and cruise missiles, and intercontinental ballistic missiles.

The US President said he expected the missile shield to be ready by the end of his second term in 2029.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago

I don't trust Trump to execute it properly, tbh.

Honestly though, anti-missile shields are something we (humanity) needs. Any moron these days can throw it all away in a suicidal instant, now that Putin started a new war and now we have a bunch of smaller wars all over.

But DART showed the promise of orbital defenses, and I'd rather we have some semblance of countermeasures against large meteors, which this is a step towards doing. (Still, climate change is the existential threat that the entire world should be focusing on)

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Do it, Canada, then stall and stall and stall on your end. Put the Canadian Golden Dome HQ in Quebec and send all communication in French. Also, use the metric system. They’ll never know what hit them. C’est magnifique

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I can't wait for the US to shoot a missile into their own land because they don't know the difference between kilos and miles

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 6 hours ago

If I recall correctly, that’s already happened with a space mission (I think it was a Mars satellite). The EU used kilometers, which is the scientific norm anyway, and for some reason, the US used miles. The trajectory was WAY off.

[–] NotAGamer@lemmy.org 26 points 8 hours ago

The only enemy Canada currently needs protection from is the U.S. This "golden dome" isn't to protect Canada but to keep outside support out when the U.S. finally invades. As general Ackbar said "it's a trap".

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.snekerpimp.space 83 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This would be such a dumb decision. Does anyone remember Star Wars? Not the movie, the defense system Regan started? Isn’t this the same thing? It will never come to fruition, billions of dollars will disappear into private company’s pockets.

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 26 points 10 hours ago

billions of dollars will disappear into private company’s pockets.

That’s probably the whole purpose of it.

[–] jasonwnclife@lemm.ee 23 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Advancements in technology since Reagan’s attempt makes this more feasible today. While it is more technically feasible it is just as stupid now as it was then.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"Let's spend a tonne of money to try to break mutually-assured destruction so we can have a whole new nuclear arms race"

[–] jasonwnclife@lemm.ee 1 points 46 minutes ago
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 44 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Come on Canada, don't fall for any Trump bullshit. It has a flashy name but will be full of grift and empty promises.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago

I can’t emphasize this enough: DO NOT PAY FOR ANYTHING UPFRONT

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 hours ago

Oh totally - remember space force from the last Trump administration ?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 33 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This will shackle us to the bloated corpse of the US.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Agree. However, stalling works. Canada is great at that.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

As long as it doesn't become this era's Avro Arrow.

We should be buying European missle defense while developing our own.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago

Shhh, don't give away our secrets

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not great to see from Canada.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

To be fair, not great to see from anywhere.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

I really hope they realize this is nothing more than a means of shoveling massive sums of money to the MIC with little to nothing to show for it other than a “strong economy.”

[–] tartarin@lemm.ee 5 points 10 hours ago

It's a trap!

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Carney just won for his anti-Trump stance. And now dude's making deals with him just a couple weeks later.

Canadians, are you pissed off?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

We didn't vote for Carney for his hatred of Trump. If we voted for Carney's party, it was because the alternative would have already sold us out completely.

...Like, in a heartbeat. We'd already be rounding up the inuit and sending them to Trinidad or something equally as wrong. I'd be saving my money for my routine MRI coming up. We'd be dismantling the train system to make some offensive statue of Milhouse the Squatter.

Are you suggesting we'd think Carney's perfect and not merely the better of two imperfect choices? Do you know how politics works?

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm going off headlines. So maybe the reality has been distorted. But as a non-Canadian looking in this is how it's been presented to us

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

People like OP are either malicious or stupid. Or bots. Rather than try to make their guy look good, they try to make everyone else look bad.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago

I'm definitely annoyed at the optics of it if nothing else, but for now I am cautiously optimistic that they know what they are doing and that this is a carefully calculated discussion.

[–] Haus@kbin.earth 5 points 11 hours ago

Named after Trump's wig?

[–] refreeze@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago