this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
274 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

72137 readers
2542 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] The2b@lemmy.vg 197 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

This is just going to be used to allow fascist propaganda, isn't it?

[–] bimbimboy@lemm.ee 80 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

yes, surprising a total of 0 people.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

I am Jack’s lack of surprise.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

And still block curse words and specific terms. Fuck this place

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yep. It's exactly what Facebook did not long ago. It's just the most open oligarchy you can imagine, just consolidating their interests to push fascism at full throttle.

Its gonna be interesting, knowing some world cup is gonna happen on US soil as well.

[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I assume you mean fascist propaganda over and above the right wing rabbit holes that already exist on YouTube….

Ugh, this is terrible.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

there were so much rw propaganda before they announced this.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

Well yes. You obviously still can’t say “le dollar bean” without getting nuked from orbit. YouTube is a goodly Christian corporation after all, can’t have such content.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 84 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Intention: YouTubers can stop with the whole self censoring shit.

Example: Unaliving; PDF file; grape; etc.

Reality: Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, and other right wing grifters receive zero censorship while YouTubers still have to self censor to receive monetization.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Intention: YouTubers can stop with the whole self censoring shit.

lol. that's not the intention.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Actual reality: Right-wing grifters are already on a "whitelist", as long as they also talk about lower taxes, lessening regulations and worker's protections, and also got popular enough. Source: knew a former moderator for Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Free speech" under capitalism means the freedom to promote fascism, rascism, misogyny, homophobia, genocide, etc...

But if you post half a second of a Disney movie, your account will be permanently deleted.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in 32 points 2 weeks ago

If only half of that leniency were granted to selfhosting tools and adblockers

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

They opened their doors to the goose stepping. Fucking corporate shitheads.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is such bad news. I'm sympathetic to content creators who have to step on eggshells to please the algorithm/advertisers... But this?

Yeah, this is not that. We all know who this is for.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

almost all the right wing contents get pushed to the front. there are some that are also rw that is buried by the algorithim, because they are loud mouths, i wonder if this will change for them too.,

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

See the issue here is Google/Youtube still get to be the ones to decide what "may outweigh the harm risk". And the answer I bet will usually be whichever one serves their financial interests.

Which on one hand sure, it is their platform after all. But don't do me dry and claim you used lube.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

We will (still) allow children's cartoon characters to be mutilated and put into explicit situations and then push them as child friendly, but how dare you use a swear in the first 15 seconds of a video or say the work kill.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I still wouldn't trust Google not to nuke my channel on a whim even in spite of those relaxed moderation rules. What's stopping a little bribe from the right company or political party from causing them to backpedal or even tighten their grip further?

This is why one should at least mirror their content to PeerTube or a similar alternative platform like that even if they're not going to just outright post future content to said alternative and give up on YT altogether.

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree. We've seen enough times in the past where a creator would get a strike from a video several years old because the rules changes. Anyone legit should be careful.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Slope's Game Room is about to lose his channel over 'hate speech' that isn't even his. One more reason for me to not post any future video content to YT if I ever seriously get into making vids and instead just posting everything to PeerTube where it at least isn't in danger of getting nuked because Google got pissed at me.

Update: he got to keep his channel. Still one more reason to not put any future content on YT should I pick up video content creation though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

they dont need to nuke your channel, they just bury your videos with thier algorithim, this is what pushed many smaller content creators off youtube in the pass. a channel i used to follow, i would have to painstakingly search it through other videos that arnt even related to it.

[–] ckmnstr@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Great, now that 50% of a video can be a direct call for genocide, does that at LEAST mean I can use ONE instance of a "bad" word or speak of "icky" things like death and drug abuse without being demonized?

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Introducing: Pay More, Say More

Surely this can't become deeply problematic for the social fabric.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Moderators were previously told to remove videos if one-quarter or more of the content violated YouTube policies. Now, that limit has been increased to half.

This seems like alien speak to me. They announce that shit, someone read it, and then repeated it in an article. But what does it mean?

Can you have 6 contents and make 2 really crazy? Can you tell people to commit violence for 5 minutes and then review a game for 6 minutes? Is there a dude with tvtropes open going through and marking the contents of content?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It depends on who is being targeted.

If you make a video calling for attacks on women, palestinians, gay people, etc., that's all good!

If you talk about taxing rich people, that's extreme violence. Immediate ban.

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

Believe it or not, straight to jail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Videos are allowed if "freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk"

oh it's that easy huh. why didn't we think of this before lol.

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

They really are killin' everything, aren't they...

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

youtube shadowbanning, demonitization and censorship is the most retarded shit that's ever happened to the internet. the whole website is videos and comments of people who cater to kids and commercial advertisers and cant say shit.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

At least true crime youtubers won't have to bleep half their videos anymore /s

[–] Twoafros@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This sucks but I think this will lead to a Youtube exodus and other platforms like Peertube will creator and user base will grow

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

How many people have even heard of peertube?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm gessing that's not gonna positively impact the people i watch and instead go towards some dumb shits.

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

"Muh ~~freedums~~ profit" outweighs life. The silent bit spoken aloud. Cool cool.

As expected from this timeline and this garbage conglomerate.

[–] atlien51@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wait what??? This came out of nowhere ??

YouTube not cracking down on free speech??

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I like freedom of speech but it seems like it would be pretty difficult to weigh those things against one another. what is the metric that they have in common? I don't know that there is one

load more comments
view more: next ›