this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
655 points (99.4% liked)

Selfhosted

48649 readers
914 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jim@programming.dev 118 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think a few folks haven't read the article or know who Jeff Geerling is. The title of this article is confusing.

Jeff posted a video on YT about how to self-host your own media in 2024. He recently got a violation from YT that YT considers his video to be harmful and dangerous. He appealed, got denied, but then the update is that YT removed the violation.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Saw the video… It mentions ”ripping” and even shows clips of some blockbuster movies. No wonder any copyright-sensitive automation gets triggered pretty fast. This will only get worse.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty fast? The video was uploaded in 2024.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

What if I decide to digitize my entire movie catalog? I would have to rip those DVDs and blurays...

[–] dieTasse@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think if the ripping includes de-DRM-ing it's is illegal in a lot of countries. I am not saying it's right, we should own our own content, I am just saying it as a fact.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 70 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It says (updated) but what is the update?

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 148 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Update (one day later):

YouTube has just reinstated the video, after what I presume is a human review process. I wish it didn't take making noise on socials to get past the 'AI deny' process :(

Go forth, and self-host all the things! I'll post further updates in this issue in my YouTube project.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Go forth, and self-host all the things!

He means self-hosting as in hosting his own PeerTube instance? Right??? 🙏

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

if you read further, he writes about peertube too

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, he says he's dependent on the ad revenue. However, no one is asking for him to drop YouTube. Also posting on PeerTube will simply have him reach more viewers. It won't move viewers away from YouTube.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People don't pay. They say they would but they don't. So we are stuck with YouTube and ads. I know people complaint about them but what is the alternative. People have to eat.

And yes I block ads I don't care but I understand why they are needed. And for some reason most don't block them.

[–] BlessedDog@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

All European citizens have the right to object to automated decision making under the GDPR

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 76 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

YouTube restored the video, but not until Jeff had made a huge stink about it (and rightfully so, those yt fuckers can eat a dick).

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I hate youtube so much. When are they moving all to ~~freetube~~ peertube or something? How long do we all accept Google youtube?

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

They're the 800lb gorilla, and no other platform can create "youtuber" income, so it's a real problem for people like Jeff Geerling to move from yt, even if they know it's bad, because it's a major part or all of their income.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 12 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

When are they moving all to freetube or something?

Unless I'm missing something Freetube is a client. So it wouldn't be Jeff moving to freetube it would be you using freetube to watch his content on YT.

I'm guessing you meant peertube instead of freetube and your answer there is "When they can get paid." Making content takes time and costs money and YT pays creators like Jeff for doing it.

I dislike YT alot but there's financial decisions at play here that can't really be argued with.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, and it was a one off restore, so others who are mentioning self hosting will still be taken down as long as that policy remains.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I agree.

I will add, however, that Jeff's main concern isn't the policy itself, but that he and other youtubers can't see it or know what the rules are. The lack of transparency is the real issue.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 weeks ago

Update (one day later):

YouTube has just reinstated the video, after what I presume is a human review process. I wish it didn't take making noise on socials to get past the 'AI deny' process :(

[–] lefixxx@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yeah I remember once when my friends Synology started acting harmful when he run jellyfin on it. it started off gasing mustard gas. It poisoned the well and made his son addicted to zyns. All of the cars in his neighborhood needed new batteries. The country's GTP dropped a lot that month and the ozone layer is gone. Thank God YouTube stopped platforming such harmful content. Too bad so luch damage has already been done.

Yes, exactly. The server I run jellyfin on kept promising me cake, though I am fairly certain the cake is a lie.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Synology is already enshittifying itself

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 56 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Jeff should consider hosting on Peertube and keeping his Patreon active. He's awesome and more than capable, I'd mirror him in a hot second.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He's on float plane. I think he's trying to make a living, so I'd assume YouTube ad revenue is a factor

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He's on float plane

I'll never support anyone on that platform. I'll never do anything to give LTT a cent.

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm not big on LTT either, I'd like to see him on Nebula. The price is reasonable and they have some really good high quality content.

[–] grozzle@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I seem to remember Jeff explaining his choice, and a big factor was that Nebula doesn't have comments under videos, nor any other similar forums for video posters and watchers to chat. I think he said he wouldn't be happy without that direct interaction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dieTasse@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

Flotplane is a decent enough alternative. They keep gutting YouTube's ad-rev, sooner or later, something will have to give.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's pretty harmful to Googles cloud business.

[–] grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago

Who would win:

  • A 2 trillion dollar multinational technology company
  • Some guy's hobby project
[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 46 points 2 weeks ago
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

Isn't that what an mp3 players main purpose is? Are mp3 players bad now?

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 91 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes cause they can’t sell you a subscription for your mp3 player.

Fucking rent seeking behaviour from corporate parasites.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's the one thing idiocracy got wrong it wouldn't be Costco it would be Rent-A-Center

[–] Bags@piefed.social 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Costco bought RAC in a stunning buyout in 2437 after Costco's CEO Harambe Memelord Disney Jr. offered RAC's CEO Squiggy John John John John Johnson a 2-for 1 deluxe latte coupon and an extra big-ass fry.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Correct, if you ain't streaming from corpo, you are denying them engagement and profits

That's a crime, shit Lord

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I cannot stress enough that I would download a car.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 weeks ago

You're God Damn Right.gif

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

An "off" switch... She'll get years for that! Off switches are illegal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9AZZVnNw60&t=26s

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey kid.... You wanna self host an api call? 😈

[–] truxnell@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You wouldn't steal an API call...

[–] nick_99@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Would YOU download an API call?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] suswrkr@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

it would be amazing if geerlingguy was the one to make youtube go mask off

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Google has been mask off since they removed "don't be evil" as their slogan, and they've been proving it ever since. Apparently people don't pay attention!

load more comments
view more: next ›