this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
268 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24265 readers
1995 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"We're looking at doing something where in the case of good, reputable farmers, they can take responsibility for the people that they hire, and let them have responsibility, because we can't put the farms out of business, and at the same time, we don't want to hurt people that aren't criminals," Trump told reporters.

Sounds a lot like slavery to me

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 5 points 8 hours ago

Step one: target field workers

Step two: incarcerate them

Step three: punish them with field work, but as prisoners

Chain gangs!

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 28 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

So, the immigrants are criminals if they are not authorized to be in the country. But the people unlawfully employing them aren't criminals? I'm confused about what he's saying, but then again, I'm also 100% he's confused about what he's saying so you can't really blame me, right?

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't about immigration or migrant workers, this is purely racist theatre. Punishing brown people for the sake of being evil.

If the government REALLY wanted to end undocumented workers, they'd go after the people hiring them. Workers are mobile. They move around a lot. 30000 acre farms pretty much just stay put. The owners of those farms already have tight margins some years. Imagine how it would be if they got hit with a $50k fine for each undocumented worker? Undocumented workers would end overnight because they can hire minimum wage worker for less than the 50k fine.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 7 hours ago

Conservatives don't want to solve real problems. They're like toddlers that are angry without understanding anything, but they want to scream and throw things. Broken people.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago

The crime is not being white.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago

They just need to buy a few more shitcoins.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Probably going to be nazi style "work camps"

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Yes, they're working back to plantations.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 30 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I want people to realize the outsized amount of leverage that farmers will have on their employees. Employers will literally be able to say that they'll do what they're told and take whatever they're given or the employer can just drop a dime to ICE and have them deported without being able to settle their affairs or contact their families.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

The status quo will be a radical departure, indeed.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 12 hours ago

He'll decide in two weeks.

However, it would be pretty intelligent to target only liberals and leave his base alone. I sorta don't expect him to be that rational.

[–] CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So, how much is Trump going to charge for these slave-owner permits?

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm betting they use the "punishment for a crime" clause that allows slavery and begin selling undocumented immigrants to the highest bidder.

I wouldn't put full blown slave auctions past these people

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I never understood why trump did the pope thing. I think I get it now. He wants to sell Indulgences.

"However, the abuse of indulgences for almsgiving, so that they became a method of moneyraising or ignored the requirements for contrition or charity, had become a serious problem which the church recognized but was unable to restrain effectively.[9]"

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 20 hours ago

I dunno, how much does a permit to run a prison in the US cost?

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Anybody who still believes any of the words coming out of his mouth is a lost cause.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

You can believe these specific words of his. For all intents and purposes, with these measures the Big Orange ended up legalizing slavery after removing the few rights these workers had. Now farmers can do whatever they want with them. If they try to complain to the authorities, they will be sent to Guantanamo or El Salvador, so they will remain silent and obedient even when they experience abuse.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yep. Keep them as slaves. Or very close to it. It's so obvious. Due to everything that's happening the immigrants will be in fear and desperation. They'll work for below minimum wage in horrid conditions and be too afraid to do anything about it.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 16 hours ago

yes, this is what will happen, but don’t delude yourself into thinking this is new

what you describe has been the reality of agriculture (and other industries) for a while now, and not just in the US, it’s this way in canada too for example

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I mean, I only worked one season with migrant laborers, so you may have more experience...

But a lot just aren't gonna come here this season. They don't need us, at least not as much as we need them. If anything I'd expect all this shit to drive up their wages.

Quick edit:

There's a misconception farm work is "unskilled", it's not. So the vets stay out and we get less experienced workers who do the job slower, and for a higher hourly to deal with the risk and uncertainty.

So both per hour wages and amount of hours needed are gonna go up.

Shits still going to become substantially more expensive.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Saw it in construction too. Don’t do it anymore but between summers and winters and after school, I put a few years into working construction in the late 2000’s and early 2010’s.

Immigrant, not an immigrant. Legally here, not legally here. Experience is experience. And experience saves you money.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

That was my 1st thought. "Let the owners take responsibility for them" sounds an awful lot like indentured servitude. If at any point, their boss could decide to simply rescind that protection and have them deported, then they're basically trapped.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

He's saying the quiet part out loud again.

Like, yeah dude, we all know the reason why we demonize "illegal" immigrants so much is so that they can be exploited for cheap labor. You don't gotta rub it in our faces.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like bullshit.

Source: Farms near me have already lost people to deportation. People with no criminal record. People who paid more taxes than a lot of people I know. People who work hard.

Fuck this administration.

[–] jonne 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a tension in the Republican party between the ones that talk about immigration just to be elected (the owner class that bankrolls the Republican party), and the ones that actually want them gone (like Stephen Miller and most of the MAGA base). The former realises that illegal immigration is useful to stop workers from organising and depress wages, the latter doesn't care about that and wants them gone. That's why you are Trump taking both sides of the issue: he wants exceptions for hotels, construction and farms (because he's hired illegals himself for these things), but he also doesn't want to alienate his base because 'they took our jobs' and all that.

That's the main reason ICE has historically been told to only deport 'criminals' and leave the rest alone instead of doing what they're doing now.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Ha tension! Wake me up when one of these fuck heads goes on camera and calls trump a little bitch. Until then they are all terrified of a guy that shits himself.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

They're welcome to carry it a lot farther than that.

[–] jonne 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Why would they need to do that? All they had to do was call him and ask for him to stop with the raids on businesses (possibly in exchange for a donation), and they got exactly what they wanted.

[–] DarkDecay@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Yummmm! TACO immigration everyone

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 19 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I’m low key waiting for some republican chucklefuck from arkansas or some shit to propose reintroducing the three fifths compromise for immigrants.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Why not go all the way and bring back pure slavery?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I think it’s a nonzero, albeit extremely small, possibility at this point

[–] illegible@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

“Transition to Slavery: In some regions, particularly in the American colonies, indentured servitude eventually gave way to racialized chattel slavery as a more profitable and permanent source of labor”

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

One of the main reasons for that was that it was easy to run away from an indenture.

[–] dinren@discuss.online 1 points 23 hours ago

Trump wants white slaves.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

This is a fantastic idea. The brilliance of the 47th president strikes again. Give them work permits, ensure they are paid a fair wage and the labour standards are adhered to, and it will guarantee that they become hardworking honest taxpayers who contribute to the American economy.

Wait, that is the plan... right?

Right...?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

More likely, he'll bring back an even more unjust version of the bracero program.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 6 points 18 hours ago

"Best i can do is slave status"

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

They should just grant all farms/businesses the ability to place premium processing for an i-140 for all of their workers who don't currently have citizenship under category EB-3 for free. Halt deportations and spend the money on professing those requests for 90 days. Then re-evaluate how much money that saved them, how much money it makes the country in taxes, and maybee realize they should have been encouraging all companies to sponsor their employees before this, and re-evaluate what they count as qualified. A not priority i-140 is standardly is $715 and takes like 8 months.

They could tell employees, if you need a sponsor we will pay you $1 less an hour for 8 months and pay the cost for you, and once the 8 months are up you will get a $1 raise. The company would actually make money doing so.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

all I can do is shake my head every single fucking day with this guy

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

let them eat taco

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Good! The FARMERS can keep their Workers which leaves MORE ROOM for First Graders with Cancer to be Deported to El Salvador!

Nat Turner 2