this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
146 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

6445 readers
1681 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Unfortunately, the article doesn't really say why it's necessary with personality rights already in place, or how copyright would apply differently.

β€œIn the bill we agree and are sending an unequivocal message that everybody has the right to their own body, their own voice and their own facial features, which is apparently not how the current law is protecting people against generative AI,” Danish culture minister [said].

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 4 points 8 hours ago

I watched this video report/interview earlier. She found out her voice was being used in British railways as the announcer without her knowledge or consent.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 22 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You would think this was already a thing, it seems incredibly obvious and intuitive

[–] LuckyJones@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

It is a thing. Personality Rights. They exist in Danish law already. Maybe this new proposal is something else, something more specific or closes some loophole.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I guess this would work, but why not make a specific law? Copyright is meant for creative acts. Humans are created, in an act, but, never mind.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago

The answer seems obvious. This is simply a gift to famous people, who will be able to demand licensing fees without having to do any additional work. Just neo-feudalism.

The pitch makes as much sense as trying to sell ordinary copyright as a way to stop people forging documents.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

So is there a fair use exemption for satire?

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 1 points 1 hour ago

It also would still allow parodies and satire, so some of the standard doctrine of fair use would still apply.

[–] Ragnor@feddit.dk 1 points 9 hours ago

Read the article...

[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Denmark is literally the best country

*disclaimer; the specifics of your socioeconomic circumstance may differ wildly from my super privileged nordic β€œive only ever lived in 3 of what is considered the top 5 countries of the world” background; https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FEKEjpTzB0Q&pp=ygUYd2VsY29tZSB0byB0aGUgZ29vZCBsaWZl

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Just wait until you find out how they treat refugees...

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Just wait until you find out how refugees treat the very people who pay to put food on their tables and a roof over their heads.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

aka "I have no empathy for other people" and "I only read right-wing media".

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Refugees are a group of people that's very heterogenous. They don't have one common way of treating Denmark. Except for the 'asking Denmark for asylum' of course.

Denmark does treat refugees a certain way, if by Denmark we mean their government, and not Danes in general. The government has certain policies which define their treatment. Basically they're trying to win the race to the bottom: 'treating them worse than other countries do', hoping refugees will go to other countries instead. It's a shortsighted tactic because now we here in the Netherlands as well as in other countries, are joining the race to the bottom. Which means collectively we are losing our humanity, while still largely getting equal amounts of refugees at our borders. Unless of course you're willing treat people so poorly, that even a warzone is more acceptable. But what in the world are we defending if we are willing to lose all human decency over it?

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 33 minutes ago

Sure, daddy "all refugees are ungrateful criminals" cool

[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

TouchΓ©, but in my defense, all countries suck, and mostly just serve the 1%, so the bar wasn’t high to begin with

[–] oxf@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 hours ago

Maybe there's a correlation

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

DoppelgΓ€nger’s are derivative works.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

there can be only one

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 17 hours ago

Don't worry, if your likeness lands in a torrent, it will be legal for Meta/Facebook to use it :)