this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
455 points (98.7% liked)

News

31294 readers
2984 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 230 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Before the second Trump era, it would’ve been seen as a ridiculous violation of the First Amendment to have some kind of monitor making sure the media was being nice to the president.

No. No, it is ridiculous. Don’t pretend it’s fine.

I hope Matt Stone and Trey Parker create no end of shit for Paramount/CBS.

RIP America.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 94 points 4 days ago (1 children)

With the multi-billion-dollar deal they just signed, Paramount loses no matter what.

I love it.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, those billions of dollars are sure to cause untold sadness among the shareholders.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm referring to the deal Trey an Matt just signed. Firing them will cost billions.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 14 points 4 days ago

They won't fire them. Trump will just ignore any satire that they throw his... lol, no, he won't. I don;t know how this will go. That's a lot to write off by firing. This could get ugly and go beyond just political and business dealings. "Will someone rid me of these cartoon guys?"

[–] Microw@piefed.zip -4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They signed a streaming deal. Cancelling the show order would have no impact on that deal whatsoever.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Which means they get the money but Paramount gets no show to profit from

[–] Microw@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Yes, Paramount would get no new episodes to profit from, but they would still have the entire backcatalogue to profit from until the timeframe for this deal ends

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Part of the deal included 50 new episodes.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago

The party of small government, folks.

[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 76 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Sure sounds like free speech.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 days ago

Free speech...with conditions.

[–] Lydia_K@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Speech will continue to be free as long as you are saying the right things.

(All other speech will be heavily fined)

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Stop oppressing media babysitters!!1!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 62 points 4 days ago (2 children)

“They made commitments to address bias and restore fact-based reporting. I think that’s so important,” Carr told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly on his show Thursday night.

So sick of these assholes for whom "fact-based reporting" means "lies that promote fascism" and "fake news" means "true reporting."

[–] floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

— George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

CBS was already pretty terrible about giving both sides airtime and attacking both sides equally... even when the evidence was clear that one side was in the wrong or there was additional context left untold. And it has almost always benefited the right when they do that.

So I actually agree. They should go to fact-based reporting. But I'm guessing my idea of fact-based reporting is different from theirs.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago

More like a political commissar...

[–] TheRealShadeSlimmy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

This is the word.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 20 points 3 days ago

Welp, guess political commissars are back.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 36 points 4 days ago

So sad that the oval office is occupied by such a small, weak man.

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I will never watch or support CBS ever again.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Or paramount

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 31 points 4 days ago

So what government offices aren't being weaponized at this point and where are all the small/no interference republicans at?

[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Got it. Can't offend Glorious Leader. Nazi simps.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

This is a very Chinese move

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 17 points 4 days ago

Does Fox get a babysitter as well to make sure they don't get too pro Trump? Yeaaaaaah........

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago

I want them to start publishing the exact same hyperbolic stories they do in North Korea about the Kim family. I want to see a "Trump Family Never Poops" headline.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Ah yes, straight out of the dictatorship handbook ...

Everybody look at Russian media ... then North Korean television.
Now look back towards the newly implemented oversight on the American broadcast stations.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Do they have a red phone with a direct line to the party office?

[–] Kurious84@lemmings.world 6 points 4 days ago

Nose so far up trumps fat brown ass.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They should just fire all the news anchors and replace them with one pro-anchor who knows exactly what she's doing.

Show 'em how it's done, Ri

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

In communist Russia these people were called KGB Political Officers.

Let's normalize calling them MAGAzi Political Officers.

[–] Regna@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

In the image it seems as if he is trying to ensure that the party line isn’t merely choking him, but maybe rewarding his fetishes.