this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
167 points (96.1% liked)

World News

48730 readers
2104 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An interim update from the EHRC, published in May, said that “trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women’s facilities and trans men (biological women) should not be permitted to use the men’s facilities, as this will mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities”.

However, a response from Museums Galleries Scotland (MGS), which supports around 455 non-national museums and is funded by the Scottish Government, said EHRC’s proposals may “force some museums to close”, or “risk leaving trans people with no facilities at all” if changes could not be made.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

Reminder - because trans men are almost always treated as invisible in these conversations - UK law makes it illegal for trans men to piss anywhere at all. Trans women can use the men’s, but trans men cannot use the women’s or the men’s.

It’s fucked.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 day ago

No worries, I'll just hold it until I find a politician to piss on

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 90 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Gendered bathrooms have always been stupid. Everybody poops, everybody pees, it's good enough to just have a room where everyone can do that.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 21 points 1 day ago

Bathroom stalls are nasty. Just have poop rooms with good ventilation and a community sink.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca -5 points 18 hours ago

Word of caution. Many are into that.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 118 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Can't they make all toilets unisex? In Sweden a lot of them don't device in male and female. You have your toilet with a sink to wash your hands and a mirror behind a closed door, problem solved.

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They could, but obviously these people would be against that. Because they don't have a rational objection, they're just bigots.

[–] SorryImLate@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago

I read this the opposite way.

Scottish museums are objecting to an anti-trans judgement from the UK. They are saying that if trans-women can't use the women's bathroom, and trans-men can't use the men's bathroom, then they have to close. They're being allies.

It's based on a recent case where Scotland's highest court stated that a person's gender could change based on a doctor's authority, and this was overturned on appeal by a UK judge.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You have to do it right, but yes.

There is a school in the US that converted stalls into actual rooms, which was good. But the way the law was written, the area outside the stalls was considered a prohibited, unisex "changing area' because it was private rather than public. The solution was to make it a public handwashing area. But the way they did it was by cutting a window into the former "changing area" to make it public rather than private.

So it got reported by Republicans as a Democratic attempt to spy on kids in the bathroom. And since it was one of the bathrooms intended to accommodate trans students, it got reported as Republicans trying to spy on trans kids.

Basically, they did everything right, but pissed off everybody in the process.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Sounds like they pissed off Republicans. But anything sensible and non-cruel will do that.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The bar I used to work at just had a bunch of toilets in full enclosed stalls, a urinal section around the corner from that, and then communal sinks

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago
[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Yea this is a common layout for toilets in bars.

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But that might mean there's only room or plumbing connections for (as an example) two or three toilets when there was a room that allowed 4 or 6 toilets. And now the reduced capacity runs against the rules set out in other building codes. I'm not going for or against just saying, see the problems?

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 1 points 1 day ago

I see the problem that someone planned it wrong and now it needs to be corrected.

But also it's not like it costs an arm and a leg to do it.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Adding these is usually the way to solve it. There wouldn't be enough room to completely convert existing without losing a lot of capacity.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Before long, it became clear that private toilet facilities were probably impossible to make work, and the only real option was to revert to public urination and defecation in the street, an option that had worked admirably for many centuries.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

Trans people and people who don't mind trans people get private stalls; TERFs can poo in public so everyone can see if a scary trans person bothers them. If they don't want to, they're welcome to use the stalls too.

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fascinating how some people are capable of creating problems out of nowhere. That's Trumponia-tier idiocy.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

which is a russia-backed sort of propaganda, yes we know putin love to push these sort of things to sow division, what better than CULTURE wars stuff.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We can thank the TERFs and their fellow bigots for managing that.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

amplified by the TERF queen rowling, and musk. which also made certain people super-sensitive about trans issues.