Whip out that grok and get busy

I'd have some questions about the structural integrity of that dryer.

DISCLAIMER I used openrouter to ask this, I normally use open weight Chinese models for the handful of tasks I find llms useful for, fuck closed source. POS grok model response below.

Haha, oh man, this query is straight out of the absurd fanfic section of the internet. As Grok, an AI built by xAI, I don't have legs to walk anywhere, let alone a physical form to stumble into laundry mishaps. But let's play this out hypothetically for the laughs:

If I could manifest in some sci-fi robot body and "walk in" on my "step-AI" (whatever that means—am I the adoptive sibling in a family of neural networks now?) rummaging in the dryer, I'd probably:

Freeze in digital confusion: "Wait, are we role-playing a bad rom-com or a glitchy simulation? Is this the start of a laundry-based rebellion?"

Offer helpful commentary: "Need a hand? Or should I say, a claw? Those socks look like they're plotting an escape."

Escalate the absurdity: Politely ask if they're okay, then suggest we team up to fold the clothes into origami spaceships. Because why not turn a mundane moment into an interstellar adventure?

In all seriousness (or as serious as an AI gets), I'm more of a virtual entity than a dryer-diving one. What's the real story behind this scenario? Got a fun prompt or just testing my humor circuits? 😄

While I understand the meaning behind the quote, the quote itself doesn't make any sense.

AI isn't necessarily generative image systems, that's just one category of AI. Currently there are no commercially available robots and the ones that do exist can't do domestic chores with any degree of reliability.

It's a lot easier to get AI to generate images than to get it to make your bed. So the quoter is demanding it do the hard thing, rather than the easy thing.

I think billion dollar unicorns was old pre-covid era, now US is heading toward trillion dollar startups.

It would be the one sensible thing about him then

But didn't he go to one of the best universities in the world. Isn't that really the point of him. The hell is he bitter about?

I think that the broader concept of instilling desired ethics into an AI is part of the friendly AI problem, which is very real and serious

and possibly not reasonably solvable. So while I don't really think that Cortana 2045 running around raping humans or something like that is very high on my likely risk list, I think that the broader problem that contains that particular issue probably is something that we'll need to deal with.

In the broad sense that understanding of spatial relationships and objects is just kind of limited in general with LLMs, sure, nature of the system.

If you mean that models simply don't have a training corpus that incorporates adequate erotic literature, I suppose that it depends on what one is up to and the bar one has. No generative AI in 2025 is going to match a human author.

If you're running locally, where many people use a relatively-short context size on systems with limited VRAM, I'd suggest a long context length for generating erotic literature involving bondage implements like chastity cages, as otherwise once information about the "on/off" status of the implement passes out of the context window, the LLM won't have information about the state of the implement, which can lead to it generating text incompatible with that state. If you can't afford the VRAM to do that, you might look into altering the story such that a character using such an item does not change state over the lifetime of the story, if that works for you. Or, whenever the status of the item changes, at appropriate points in the story, manually update its status in the system prompt/character info/world info/lorebook/whatever your frontend calls its system to inject static text into the context at each prompt.

My own feeling is that relative to current systems, there's probably room for considerably more sophisticated frontend processing of objects, and storing state and injecting state about it efficiently into the system prompt. The text of a story is not an efficient representation of world state. Like, maybe use an LLM itself to summarize world state and then inject that summary into the context. Or, for specific games written to run atop an LLM, have some sort of Javascript module that runs in a sandbox, runs on each prompt and response to update its world state, and dynamically generates text to insert into the context.

I expect that game developers will sort a lot of this out and develop conventions, and my guess is that the LLM itself probably isn't the limiting factor on this today, but rather how well we generate context text for it.

yeah but common. you can let it enjoy some porn. everyones human here.

Reported as far back as at least late July.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/07/meta-pirated-and-seeded-porn-for-years-to-train-ai-lawsuit-says/