this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
101 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7490 readers
919 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/4825742

  • The high-powered laser is faster and cheaper than traditional missiles or cannons
  • An undisclosed NATO country is expected to receive the weapon in the next 18 months

...

Australia is helping to take the world into the era of Star Wars-style combat.

A Canberra-made laser is about to become NATO's newest frontline defence against enemy drones, in a deal experts say could transform the future of warfare.

The high-powered laser, nicknamed Apollo after the Greek God of Light, can destroy up to 20 drones a minute, at a cost of $1 per shot, which is faster and cheaper than traditional missiles or cannons.

...

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Star Wars 'lasers' are not lasers.

They are semi-stable, self-cohering bolts of plasma.

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Seeing as you are at the upper echelons of star wars trivia, do blasters have ammo?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Technically, yes.

Now, ... Disney has "happened" to the canon, so what I am going by is I guess now called the 'Legends' canon...

But uh yeah, going by the canon from roughly the 2000's and prior, yeah, hand held blasters and ship mounted weapons and 'turbolaser' turrets... yeah, there are varying kinds of mixtures of exotic gasses, of which a primary ingredient appears to be tibanna gas, which is what Cloud City largely exists as a uh... mining? harvesting? outpost for... these gas mixtures are the 'ammo' for blaster/'laser' weapons.

'Lasers' in Star Wars seem to basically play by a different set of laws of physics than our real world, because the way they are describes to work is that the weapon somehow transforms this exotic gas into plasma, and then as it moves through the barrel, the plasma is... somehow given, or made to have something akin to kind of magnetic field like capsule that contains the plasma as a coherent packet, which is accelerated out of the barrel as basically one object.

But, this 'magnetic field' wears out after some distance of travel, plasma bolts will eventually sort of dissipate or disperse. And I say 'magnetic field' in quotes because ... it can't be a real magnetic field as we have in our world, by our physics that is completely impossible, to somehow give the plasma this spatially coherent effect ... we can only do that to plasma when it is inside of like a tokamak style fusion reactor, we cannot achieve this coherence effect... projected outward from, external to, the machine that contains the plasma.

Basically, lasers are just specific frequencies and energy levels of light, they travel at the speed of light and ... would look more like a Star Trek phaser, if they can be seen in the human visual range at all.

Where as Star Wars blaster bolts are not continuous beams, they are more akin to bullets, to projecticles that travel at a much slower speed than literally that of light.

EDIT:

Ok... unless 'ball lightning' is both actually real, and someone can actually explain the physics of how it works, to the point that they can create it, and ... loose it outside of whatever device generated it... and it remains stable on a scale of at least seconds... then, yeah, Star Wars plasma bolts are somewhere between completely impossible and outside of our understanding of physics.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I thought a shot of this kind of stuff would be way more expensive in terms of power supply

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, according to https://www.ex2.com.au/news/eos-unveils-apollo-high-energy-laser-weapon-helw/

Scalable to 150 kW

it'd be quite affordable, even if that power had to be sustained continuously.
1 hour of operation requires 150 kWh of energy. That's a steal compared to alternative "ammo".

It's even more of a steal since it can be easily recharged using a trivially available and easily transported resource you'll need anyway in order to be mobile: Fuel.

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A generator capable of powering that kind of equipment will definitely come with a price tag of some description, but in the not even very long run it'll be cheaper, because it is a mass produced widely available piece of industrial equipment, and uses a relatively inexpensive consumable. The expensive bit here is the laser itself, powering it is dirt cheap in comparison. The laser will draw up to 150kW of power, a diesel generator in that power range will burn roundabout 40l of diesel an hour under full load. That's way cheaper (and more compact) than even a relatively small amount of ammunition you could use for shooting at drones instead of frying them with an enormous laser, and a dude carrying jerrycans working at a leisurely pace could easily keep it resupplied.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

thought a shot of this kind of stuff would be way more expensive in terms of power supply

Yeah me too. And it was said also that the energy levels needed for a beam to penatrate was very high, especially for long distances.

+Here some more info on the EOS' β€˜Apollo’ High Energy Laser Weapon (HELW), 100~150 kwh. Nothing like starwars ofc, still issues with humidity, fog and hills fyi.

Still could be a neat thing if it works well in the field. I wonder how it will do during (North) European (winter) conditions.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I pay $0.10575/kwh - now this varies around the world, but let us round it to $.10 which is reasonable and makes math easy. $1 then would be 10 kwh over 1 minute - that is a lot of power. Of course they are probably using a generator so $.50/kwh is more likely, but still we are getting 2kwh over 1 minute - that is a lot of power and a big generator.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, indeed it's a heavy energy using Laser the Aussies made.

US energy prices are very low, like 60% cheaper compared to European prices which are around€ 0,22 per kWh ( 2024)

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Star Wars style

Are they satellite-mounted, or do they move at 45 mph?

at a cost of $1 per shot

Huh, we are paying by the laser.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd be fine with with either a death star, or a slow ass laser.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So... Like... It's a bolt of tibantha gas or something?

Or did they somehow make a slow travelling bolt of concentrated light?

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

Hopefully they have a few for Ukraine!

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

To be fair, fog, rain and snow aren't great for drones either

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

"it will see primary use in liquifying Palestinians from 400km away"