this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
337 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25936 readers
1902 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder how many more people police will kill before Dems reckon with the fact that going hard against defund the police from 2020-24 was a shitty thing to do

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

The Democrats didn't want police reform.

Biden ended the lockdowns months early because BLM was forcing police reform.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago

clearly we needed police to feel better about themselves so they’d stop killing civilians

poor misunderstood police officers

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 41 points 1 day ago

His name was Charles Adair

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly after Floyd and the reaction of some people, I'm not convinced we learned a damn thing.

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We did. Some people learned the wrong thing.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fox News and OANN painted every single person that stood up against brutality targeting black people as violent terrorists.

And the viewers just... Believed them. Like, they didn't question it for even a second.

We are up against some of the dumbest and most cruel people on the planet. They have been teaching their families and communities to be like this, and they react to whatever current scapegoat or buzzword without question.

Watch, tomorrow it'll be something even dumber... "The left handed people are ruining the entire country! If their skin isn't white they are literal terrorists. The head pedophile that's done the most rapes must win the next election or God will punish America. ::furious heart goes out salutes::"

[–] Septimaeus 1 points 21 hours ago

As an exercise in empathy, I often imagine what the “dumbest and most cruel people on the planet” would be like if they weren’t constantly exposed to reality-shaping propaganda.

In some cases, I don’t even have to imagine. I can just remember what they were like before.

I think that exercise matters for a variety of reasons principle and practical, but the foremost is that it’s the only antidote and inoculant we know.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Some political parties learned the wrong thing

I'll never forget someone in my immediate family calling me a fascist to another member of my family because I attended BLM protests.

There was no irony, they really think people who simply believe that black lives have value are fascists.

I don't even have words to try to pick this one apart. This is what we (the sane people with empathy) are up against.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 15 points 1 day ago

Say his name.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Try holding your breath for 86 goddamn seconds and see what happens. The punishment for this should be 86 seconds in a box with no oxygen.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Uhm. Ackshally, your body can't detect a lack of oxygen. In a box with no oxygen, you'd likely just peacefully doze off before you (maybe) die.

What your body does detect is a build-up of carbon dioxide. So if you want to torture someone, prevent them from expelling CO2, or put them in a room full of it.

Edit: for those downvoting, OP is basically describing a Sarco Pod

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago

I used to work at a hospital where we needed to make dry ice to send out specimens. The room the dry ice was made in was basically a closet. Hook the CO2 canister up to this little box thing, take the box apart and boom. Dry ice. More than once I noticed my heart beating fast and I couldn't catch my breath while making the stuff.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What do you think is filling that oxygen-less box while the person breathes in it?

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

You will die before you produce enough CO2 to detect.

You actually don’t even need to breathe to do this. If you hyperventilate to expel the CO2 from your blood then hold your breath, you will run out of oxygen before you build enough CO2 up to detect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freediving_blackout

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago

The atmosphere is about 78% N2 and only 0.05% CO2. So If you took all the oxygen out of a room, it would be mainly nitrogen left, and still only trace levels of CO2.

[–] kchr@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Will your body produce CO2 without having oxygen to break down in the first place?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You will have stored some amount of it that you will breathe out.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That’s not enough for your body to detect.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Gympie-Gympie leaves.