this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
1153 points (99.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

9362 readers
2532 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 119 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I was right now years old when I put those two things together.

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 36 points 21 hours ago

Happy Right Now day!

[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 17 points 21 hours ago

Another TIL right here

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 85 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Conservatives across the world using God's name to persecute, oppress, and harm people they don't like.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 41 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

While simultaneously insisting that saying "oh my god" is blasphemy of the highest order

[–] BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip 30 points 21 hours ago

We should just all start calling them blasphemers whenever gods name comes up in a political discussion.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 27 points 20 hours ago

Ironically, if they had ever read the Bible, they'd know they tick all the boxes of the many scriptures that distinctly outline and warn of false Christians.

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm convinced nothing pleases Satan more

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think the Satan mythology is one of the glaring silly points of christianity. You really believe god created satan and its satan that's tempting you with whatever sins. God created demons to turn you away from god? Idk man

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

look sometimes the butthole is for fun and sometimes it's for shit. and evangelical christian god is the biggest butthole i've heard of

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 39 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

This is one of the biggest aha moments for me regarding MAGA (and many groups like them). It's all a form of theater to them, similar to pro wrestling. They use words as shorthand.

Instead of looking at someone's behavior and deciding what words are fit to describe them, they do the opposite. They take the words* already associated with that person and use that to assume their behavior. That makes it very easy to foster their collective tribalism and also makes it very easy to fit yourself into their movement when you know the right words to use to describe yourself (making it an incredibly ripe environment for conmen and corruption).

There are elements of this way of thinking on the left but it is not nearly as promenent, I believe because to be on the left you have to be open to nuance and willing/able to consider complicated ideas in order to be able to seriously consider leftist positions.

*It must be noted also depends on their understanding of the word as well, but the point still stands - they make assumptions based on their understanding of the noun. It's real mushy-brained behavior.

[–] KenOh@feddit.online 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ex-mormon here. I would say any of the curse words as a kid, but saying "God" as a curse was the line I never crossed. It was very self righteous.

Anyway, I see it in a very different light now.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 5 points 13 hours ago

I'm glad you see things differently.

I'm not opposed to belief in God, but institutionalized religion doesn't sit well as it seems largely as a method to control people.

That, and I could never get past the Epicurian paradox.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

To be fair, it's both. It basically just says "Don't invoke God's name unless it's important". Don't swear by God unless you actually mean it, don't call out his name in thanks unless you genuinely believe it, and so on and so on.

Tbh it could have just been God going "You know how you get a ping when someone does an @everyone on Discord and it really annoys you? Yeah well I get that whenever someone uses my name, so knock it off unless it's important!"

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 6 points 12 hours ago

God asking everyone to only @me for something really important and then having to mute notifications really makes a lot of sense overall.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

No it isn’t. God has a name and it’s not God. The reason we refer to him as God and not his name is this exact reason, so as not to use it in vain.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

I told my buddy that god has a proper name and he was like, “No way!” And I was like, “Yahweh!”

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Because an all-knowing all-powerful being doesn't know when you're talking about it unless you use its birth name I guess

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 hours ago

How would it even have a birth name?

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah it's like when your mom calls you by your full name and you know you've really fucked up.

[–] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 2 points 16 hours ago

Maybe he shouldn't have so many names then lol

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

I feel like people should make more left-wing christianity propaganda.

Like maybe a shirt with that quote about "a camel being able to pass through a needle before a rich guy goes to heaven." Then like a picture of a camel looking at a needle and then underneath some rich bro in a fancy car burning in hell. I'm talking shitty boomer/christian/"AI" cartoon style.

There is hella material in the gospels for this kind of propaganda. The sermon on the mount could make a whole series. Sadly I never see it.

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I remember a meme I saw once that said something like

Jesus was an anarchist

His followers are statist bootlickers

I may not be rembering correctly but it was funny

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

are there still people that think it's camel?

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

I don't see any translations that use anything other than camel.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago

Lots of people are still using the KJV, so yes.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

religion is and always has been a way to manipulate and control the weak minded.

No but see it's okay because we can just focus really hard and punish really brutally for the frivolous silly thing!

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 17 points 21 hours ago

Damn. That fact is a great example of how Christianity was used to manipulate people

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Losing sight of the morals to perform the rituals.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 9 points 21 hours ago

They never cared about morals for themselves - they want to gain an advantage for themselves by forcing "morals" upon others.

[–] fargeol@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Is it the reason why you were stoned to death if you said Jehovah?

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'd had a lovely supper, and all I said to my wife was, 'That piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah.'

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Blasphemy! He's said it again!

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

throws stone

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well, "In vain" means to do something without success, so of course conservatives of all ilks think it's fine to do, as long as they're winning.

No that's giving them way too much credit, they're just empathy free parasites sucking all the sustenance they can.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 18 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

The way the word is used in Hebrew isn’t that meaning of vain. It is vain in the sense of “vanity.” Emptiness of speech, lying, etc.

Martin Luther interprets the commandment thusly:

You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God.

What does this mean? We should fear and love God so that we do not curse, swear, use satanic arts, lie, or deceive by His name, but call upon it in every trouble, pray, praise, and give thanks.

And I think lying and deceiving very much encompasses the way the “Christian” Nationalists manipulate the religious.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This is what I get for trying to reproduce conservative brain thoughts without an explicit tag. I blame myself. (I was raised old school Catholic and know this but it's basically deep lore for anyone unfamiliar, so thank you for adding that context. I love that people on Lemmy do this FAR more often than ever happened on that other site.)

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

The way the word is used in Hebrew isn’t that meaning of vain. It is vain in the sense of “vanity.” Emptiness of speech, lying, etc.

This. The word used in the original Hebrew is "shav" (שוא) - which can mean either "vain" or "false" - and the original meaning of the commandant is to not swear in God's name on something that's not true. Of course, the religious leadership immediately thought "well, we're obviously not going to refrain from lying, and refusing to invoke God's name just because we're lying is going to make it suspicious, so let's just say we are not supposed to invoke his name at all"

[–] Greddan@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago

I mean, that's all he's for.

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 1 points 15 hours ago

Following God is already challenging enough. I don't have room to follow man claiming to represent God. You cannot serve more than one master, indeed.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It should be "Oh my god", not "Oh my God", right?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

i like "oh your god" it feels more blasphemous