this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
173 points (93.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

42379 readers
425 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I’ve always ignored Photopea because it’s completely proprietary and the pricing is predatory. I don’t approve of those models, the same reason I won’t touch Adobe.

I wish Affinity would just release linux versions, but I expect those to get worse now that they are owned by Serif.

I think your best bet is to buckle down, swallow your pride, and learn Gimp. Yeah, it’s a dumpster fire if you come from a Photoshop background because it isn’t trying to copy Photoshop, it wants to be its own thing. But even though it seems counterintuitive due to your years of existing programming, it is quite powerful.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

Krita in Linux has been amazing. I've never used Affinity, and I'm far from a pro... But I can do most of what I used to do in Photoshop in Krita fairly naturally. It's way easier to transition to than GIMP ever was.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago

Even without years of experience, gimp is unintuitive, the affinity suite is so much easier to use

I fucking hate this app/site/whatever. It's powerful, and has lots of features. But every single time I use it, the way it works is just off enough from Photoshop that I need to Google it, and I'm always pissed at the stupid reason. I hate Photopea.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 hour ago

I never even understood why he made it purely a web app.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 8 points 11 hours ago

What do you mean "now"? Photopea has always been very aggresive towards adblocks.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 20 points 18 hours ago

The garbage took itself out. I love how that works.

[–] yessikg@fedia.io 55 points 1 day ago (35 children)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Sergio@piefed.social 24 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're taking heat a little bit unfairly. This is, after all, the MILDLY infuriating community, and it can be a hassle when something stops working for you, even if it's perfectly reasonable for it to happen.

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 22 hours ago

I think you’re taking heat a little bit unfairly.

Most of it seems to come from one user who seems to hate me in particular. :D But it's fun to start a controversial topic once in a while. At least I'm not getting banned for having a different opinion (which would've definitely happened on Reddit).

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Gimp 3 is awesome now, and 100% free + no ads. Just sayin

[–] beneeney@lemmy.zip 1 points 48 minutes ago

I love GIMP but it got really laggy for me with version 3 and I haven't been able to figure out why. :(

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

I am totally supporting developers wanting to make money with their product.

But the developer of Photopea has basically built a product for people who want to get rid of Adobe's stupid subscription model and now he tries to force them to pay for his own subscription by breaking the application. That really doesn't sit right with me.

Why would I need to pay 8€/month for image editing features that run in my browser?

It also doesn't help that he went on Github and complained to the developers of uBlock Origin, replying with troll answers like "How can I help you?" but not wanting to accept any other answer than them allowing him to serve ads.

This guy can get rekt, in my humble opinion. I did like the product before this change, though. Does anyone know of similar image editors out there that can batch-crop images in a certain aspect ratio/resolution and then export them to webp? (GIMP is terrible, sorry 🥹)

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (9 children)

GIMP isn't terrible. You're just used to doing things a certain way and GIMP does it differently.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

I don't really understand why you're using ad-supported proprietary software that you've never paid a dime for (or given a dime to, since you use uBO), claiming that you don't use GIMP or Krita instead because the former "is terrible" and the latter isn't meant for cropping (a trivial, fundamental feature of the software), and then acting entitled to use the Photopea author's own personal work with zero compensation. So you have free alternatives (as in beer and as in freedom), refuse to do even the bare minimum to learn how to use them, and then go full "you took my only food; now I'm gonna starve" when Photopea's author stops you from using their own site/web app for free that they run and maintain at their own expense.

If anything, you seem entitled and willfully ignorant, and I say that from the perspective of someone who resents digital advertising and proprietary software.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I’m confused what your issue is with the dev. He seems to have posted because uBO was breaking the site for premium users and then got told “just stop monetizing effectively.” Only one reply (don’t use such an obnoxious way to insert the ad sidebar) was actually helpful, though it was at odds with part of his monetization strategy (pay for Premium to get that extra space).

If uBO devs had said “Sure, give this account premium access and we’ll check it out” and he’d refused, that would be different, but instead they said there was nothing he could do to help them and banned him from participating.

It also doesn’t seem that he’s intentionally breaking the app when uBO is in use. Rather, uBO breaks the app when ads aren’t being served and he is now detecting when this happens and serving a message about the fact.

Does anyone know of similar image editors out there that can batch-crop images in a certain aspect ratio/resolution and then export them to webp?

Not similar, but Image Magick can crop images from the cli and has webp support.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He's making it purposely hard to block the ads. The side effect of that is that it's hard to block the ad without breaking the website itself.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 4 points 20 hours ago

The way I read it, he was making it hard to remove the empty sidebar after blocking the ads in it.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

GIMP is terrible, sorry

Its actually not, but if you really hate the interface then try photogimp

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Works fine for me, Firefox and Ublock Origin, DNS by PiHole. I think there's something on your machine causing this.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Same. I just checked and it's working fine for me on Zen browser with adnauseum. No ads present, and no popups about ad blockers either.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 4 points 19 hours ago

Never heard of it.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 23 hours ago

are you sure it's not a specific ublock filter or something? i accessed it in librewolf with the default ublock origin settings and it looked fine.

[–] maximumbird@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Guess I won’t be using photopea anymore

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 5 points 21 hours ago

So many douchebags in this thread.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

"Something is breaking Photopea" ??? Yeah it's yourselves.

Not sure if this lie is allowed under the EU DSA law.

load more comments
view more: next ›