this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

London

1287 readers
29 users here now

"who’d a thunk it"

For discussion about London including the surrounding Greater London area. Discuss all things from news, travel, culture, and general life around the capital and largest city of England!

Rules and other welcoming info can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Can we not go 5 freaking minutes without hearing about Donald Trump?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

If only he were removed from somewhere

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No, it's a UK story. This is about the next Reform candidate in a by-election.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"But while some blockages in our biggest sewers can weigh as much as 25 elephants..."

The arbitrary size comparisons are my favorite part of these stories.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Got to make them relatable to the Muricans as well.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

“But while some blockages in our biggest sewers can weigh as much as 1 American”

Done

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

It should definitely be illegal for wet wipes to be advertised as flushable. Maybe it already is in the UK, but in the US it still is not.

EDIT: Maybe there should even be a legally mandated warning label about not flushing them.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago

Some of them have the ambiguous:

That's obviously:

  • Do not throw this in the toilet.
  • Please throw it directly into the sea.
  • This product can be used to attack Koopa Troopers.
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago

they should be banned

[–] Nuerion@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i mean to be fair they do flush they just fuck up a lot of shit after the fact

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago

I would argue that for something to be "flushable" it has to be something the sewer system can actually handle.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Can it be burnt as fuel?

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did tRump fall into a manhole?

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

careful pal, that's terrorism now. congrats, youre on a list.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wonder if you could burn this to make a significant amount of electricity?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't want to think about the pollution that would produce.

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 1 points 21 hours ago

The most green option is probably to just sell it on the open market. Some takeaway shops would give you a good price for it.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

LOL, my first thought! That represents a shitload of energy, but I highly doubt London has a way to handle that properly.