this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
109 points (100.0% liked)

TankieJerk

121 readers
63 users here now

Dunking on Tankies from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry of any kind.
  2. No tankies or right-wingers. Liberals are allowed so long as they are aware of this
  3. No genocide or atrocity denial

We allow posts about tankie behavior, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion. Please redirect any Fediverse tankie-posts to !MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.works to avoid bringing drama to Piefed.social

Curious about non-tankie leftism? If you've got a little patience for 19th century academic style, let a little Marx and Kropotkin be your primer!

Marx's Communist Manifesto, short and accessible! Highly recommended if you haven't read it

Kropotkin's Conquest Of Bread

Selected works of Marx

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Meanwhile the Soviets wouldn’t let even damaged B-29s land after bombing Japan, and when they did they imprisoned the crews and confiscated the planes.

Then they took the planes apart and copied them as closely as possible.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can't remember which aircraft it was, but there's a story about how one of their copied models had a mysterious hole drilled in it, which was missing from the originals. A good amount of time was spent speculating on what its purpose was. Was it an improvement of some kind? Some new hardware? A space for a specialized camera?

Nope, turns out the model they copied from had a extra hole drilled there by accident, and not knowing what it was, the soviets just kept it.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Pofski@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Excellent read, thank you very much!

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then they took the planes apart and copied them as closely as possible.

Which was tricky given imperial vs. metric supply chains/production capabilities:

The Soviet Union used the metric system and so sheet aluminium in thicknesses matching the B-29's U.S. customary measurements was unavailable. The corresponding metric-gauge metal was of different thicknesses. Alloys and other materials new to the Soviet Union had to be brought into production. Extensive re-engineering had to take place to compensate for the differences, and Soviet official strength margins had to be decreased to avoid further redesign.[11] Despite those challenges, the prototype Tu-4 weighed only 340 kg (750 lb) more than the B-29, a difference of less than 1%.[12]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-4

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We hear a lot about the Soviets and Chinese copying American hardware. What has the US copied? We have (had) a huge industrial/ design base but surely other countries have invented something good at least once or twice!

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

...Would the cavity magnetron the UK sent over count?

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Fascinating! http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6331897.stm I hadn't heard of that.

I'm not sure it counts, just because it wasn't copied secretly as much intentionally shared?

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, China has invented important things once or twice.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Well no doubt. I'm curious what was copied the other way like the Flying Fortress in the article.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Wait what, Russian government is selfish and acts like an asshole?

Who would've guessed.

Oh right, my ancestors who fell fighting them.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

What's that saying? Russian blood, British intelligence and American steel?

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The West only really joined in 1944 after Hitler was defeated by the Soviets at Stalingrad.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does 'The West' not include Britain and France?

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

France instantly surrendered in return for giving up half their land and becoming Vichy France so hell no.

Most of Britains fighting was defensive. Initially against the Nazi invasion, and very large part was actually defending their British colonies in Africa from the Nazis. Hitler wanted to take control of the oil which Britain defended.

It was not until after the Nazis were defeated at Stalingrad that the Brits actually started ground invasions of Nazi territory.

This certainly helped the Soviets because it weakened Hitler and forced the Nazis to fight multiple fronts. But from another point of view it can be seen as the UK and US pouncing to take half of Europe as the spoils of war, after the Soviets took the heavy losses to defeat the Nazis.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

To be fair: some points are more relevant than others.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I get a little bent when people act like America was fucking around before jumping in. Sorry, we were kinda busy turning our enormous country in a fucking war machine, while at the same time supplying our allies.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I do feel we Americans under credit the Soviets and the Chinese for that matter. We don't even bring up that Mexico committed a squadron in the Pacific.

201st Fighter Squadron

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

We do take too much credit! But some don't give us enough.