this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
477 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

76918 readers
3243 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All Kagi Search users can now flag low-quality AI content (“AI slop”) in web, image, and video search results. We will verify these reports using our own signals. If a domain primarily publishes AI-generated content, we will downrank it in Kagi Search and mark it as AI slop. If a page is AI-generated but the domain is mixed (not mostly AI), we will flag the page as AI-generated but will not downrank it.

For media results, images and videos confirmed as AI-generated, they will be labelled as such and automatically downranked on the results page. Users can also choose to filter out AI-generated media entirely.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] org2001@lemmy.radio 77 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I sincerely hope this works as advertised. People are quite sick of all the AI slop floating around ...

[–] tal@lemmy.today 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It shows up for me in the UI. I imagine that it works, and if it doesn't, it'll be debugged.

I think that the bigger question is whether the rate of spam website creation will outpace the rate of human flagging of them.

Kagi's process involves humans. I bet that the spam website stuff runs autonomously.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 24 points 4 days ago

It runs autonomously to a degree, but a lot of these sites operate via posting a wide variety of content on the same domains, after those domains have previously gained status in search engines.

So for example, you'll have a site like epiccoolcarnews[.]info hosting stuff like "How to get FREE GEMS in Clash of Clans" just because previously they posted an article about cars that Google thought was good so they ranked up the domain in their ranking algorithm.

Permanently downrank the domain, and eventually they have to start with a new domain that, as is the key part here, has no prior reputation, and thus has to work to actually get ranked up in search again.

They're also going to be making this a public database, and have said they'll use it to train AI-generated content detection tools that will probably be better at detecting "AI generated articles meant to appear legitimate by using common keywords and phrases", rather than just "any text of any form that has been generated by AI" like other AI detection tools do, which would make them capable of automating the process a bit with regard to specifically search engines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Could improve it by calculating % on how much some site has published ai slop vs has not. This way it would promote those who avoid that shit and push offenders to the bottom or even let users just outright filter them.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Is Kagi worth it? I mostly use DDG but every search engine I’ve tried is terrible now and rapidly getting worse by the day.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

Try the free trial.

They give you enough searches for free that you should be able to figure out if there is value for you and the type of searches you do.

I find it a much better experience than Google which was what I was using before.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Is Kagi worth it?

I've heard differing accounts. Some people definitely swear by it. But if you're just using search as a portal to Wikipedia or Generic News Of the Day, it still points you to the same catalog of high profile sites as everyone else.

$5-10/mo isn't a wallet buster. But is it really any better than searching Google with udm=14 turned on? YMMV.

Nobody has satisfactorily explained to me how much Kagi is cribbing from the other search engines and how much is their own internal web crawling and sorting heuristics.

[–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

I think so. I’ve been using it for over a year, as another poster said Kagi feels like Google did 15 years ago, before it destroyed itself.

Every time I use a search on another machine, my first reaction is “oh my god what is all of this shit everywhere? ads, spam, AI slop, shopping garbage, etc”, then I quickly realize it’s not my computer and that’s just what Google looks like now.

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 4 days ago

Absolutely. I've been using it for a month and it feels like Google, but before they enshittified. DDG was my previous goto search engine, but it's gotten really bad as well. Especially the aggressive keyword replacements drove me almost insane.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 11 points 4 days ago

I enjoy it. They have a 100-search free trial so you can test it out for yourself. Between them down ranking sites full of trackers and allowing you to put your own preferential ratings on sites, I find myself getting the results I'm after so much quicker.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (12 children)

I understand that running services costs money, and I've heard nothing but good things about Kagi. Can anyone here convince me to switch?

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Eh, not really. I don't use google and I block trackers anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

Your money, or your personal data, used for whatever damned purpose they choose.

That’s really the choice.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Running services costs money.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Does it really cost what Kagi is charging? I would love to see some research on this if people happen to know where to find such articles.

Like, in theory to pay for Kagi or a similar service but it's just extrotionately expensive.

I pay for other service which are offered for free (like email hosting), but those are reasonably priced.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Can anyone here convince me it's worth the price?

Depends on what you want from them and your financial situation.

For me, yeah, it is. I want to pay a service fee and not deal with ads or someone logging, profiling, and trying to figure out how to monetize my searches. For me, the $10/mo for unlimited searches tier is what I want. I'm principally concerned about privacy.

I don't really take much advantage of most of the extra stuff they do other than the Threadiverse (they call it "Fediverse Forums") search lens and sometimes their Usenet search engine. Maybe this effort to suppress AI-generated spam websites will be nice, but have to see what happens, as I expect that the SEO crowd creating spam websites will also aim to adapt if it becomes sufficiently impactful to their bottom line.

If one of their extra features particularly fits your use case (say, the ability to fiddle with website priorities or blacklist or pin them in your search results) that might be valuable to you, but I can't speak as to that. I've seen people on here say that they really like that, but I don't use that functionality. Or the ability to easily download images in results from their image search if you're on mobile and are hitting something like pinterest, which is obnoxious on Google Images. Search bangs. Depends on what features you use and what each is worth to you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] freeman@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

AI-driven community detection 👎🏻

Community-driven AI detection 👍🏻

[–] jsheradin@fedia.io 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wish there was a way to buy a Kagi subscription without AI assistant bundled in. I never plan to use it and it adds no value to me. I'd rather save the money and get a cheaper subscription.

[–] maccam912@programming.dev 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It makes sense it costs them something, but if it helps at all I've been paying for kagi since before the ai assistant stuff was included, it was the same price.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Same. I have been using Kagi since before they added AI features. I didn’t use them then and I don’t use them now. The price is the same.

By far the best search engine in my book. They even have a fediverse search mode.

[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Can we make an extension for Firefox and call it Sloppy-Stoppy?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's sucks not knowing anybody IRL interested in Kagi, I would love to try the 2-person account.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Wait, 2-person

Edit: oh, my dad and I both subscribe. I might even do the family plan and bring my wife into it.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I don't have a problem paying for a good service. I do have a problem having all my searches, video or article views linked to an account (with my payment data i.e. real name no less).

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Then I have great news for you! Kagi accept bitcoin, does not validate email addresses (so you can register as fhhdsbgwg@hrjesbgwgw.com if that appeals to you), and they implemented privacy pass tokens that fully anonymize your searches. They also allows searching through tor!

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You still need to log in and link all your searches to each other. Those are trivial to de-anonymize you from.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

https://help.kagi.com/kagi/privacy/privacy-pass.html

When you enable Privacy Pass, instead of logging in with your Kagi account for each search, you use special cryptographic tokens. These tokens prove you have the right to use Kagi's services without revealing who you are. This means your searches can't be linked back to your account or to each other, providing an additional layer of privacy.

Obviously you lose some of the customization, but otherwise still a great service.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just use their third party crypto payment service. It doesnt transmit any of this. Perhaps look this kind of thing up prior to insinuating these things are required for Kagi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They have a no-log, no-profile policy, which is why I use them.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I don't trust companies to not log my data. Not ever.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

I never knew about this browser before today. Trying it out on iOS. It’s just an extension, but it’s good so far!

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I stopped using Kagi because I felt their base tier didn’t include enough searches but if they keep adding good features like this I may go back.

load more comments
view more: next ›