this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
560 points (89.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

27512 readers
1067 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you care this much about JS being cringe I don't trust you to contribute good code to a project anyways

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

People on here really think the language determines the quality of the project lol

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Unless you are making a HTML/CSS only site (based) what do you want to use instead?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Invent a new internet where you can script pages directly in Python or TypeScript.

Otherwise, you get to enjoy a silly toy language from the 90's.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I'm on, but no one is interested.

[–] FunkFactory@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Kotlin/JS would be my first choice ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 51 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I worked in heavy JavaScript codebases back in the IE days and wasn’t too crazy about it. Then JIT compilers like v8 came along and made it run a lot faster and TypeScript also made it more usable for larger codebases. I now consider TypeScript among my favorite languages. I’ve also written a lot of Go lately, and while I appreciate its speed and smaller memory footprint, the missing language features kind of grate on me and I don’t mind taking a bit of a performance hit for the (IMO) superior ergonomics of TypeScript, especially for workloads where I/O is more of the bottleneck than compute.

[–] sip@programming.dev 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

agreed. typescript is excelent, especially if you make it strict and know a bit of complex types to make sure things stay put.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Chiming in as a professional TS dev. It's really a joy to do web dev work in the post TS world.

[–] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What do you think of JSDoc? As someone who knows neither I find the idea of no required transpilation very appealing, while still getting the TS ecosystem tools.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

JSDoc is much more cumbersome than using TypeScript. That's it. It clutters the code in a way that TypeScript somehow avoids. TS types are smoothly integrated in the code itself, IMO. Not as much the case with JSDoc.

[–] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Thanks! As a hardware guy it'll be a long time before I do anything with this information. Nice to hear the opinions of actual Devs.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I suspect most Lemmy users hating on JS haven’t done much professional JS work. Especially these days with TypeScript and all the modern conveniences.

I’m curious, what kinda hardware do you work on?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why is transpilation unappealing to you?

[–] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Being honest, I'm an outsider looking in. Most likely these things are solved problems, but alternates are always interesting to hear insider opinions on.

Sounds like it's developer experience Vs required post processing in this case, which is a reasonable tradeoff to think about

[–] sip@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

i wish a more performing language would have this type system. the only other ones I know are Rust which is a bit strict and slow to dev on, and Haskell which is too much.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It's funny because I learned to program with strongly types languages and when I moved over to JavaScript I always complained about it for the longest time but now that I use mostly typescript at work I kind of miss some of the old JavaScript patterns and their flexibility. But for working with large teams or large projects in general it's nice to have typescript

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Genuinely curious, how many of you hating on JS have done professional frontend work recently? If you have done professional work, was it part/full time, using TypeScript, how big was your eng team, did you have to worry about Server Side Rendering?  Maybe some extra context will show certain types of projects yield devs that hate the language.

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 99 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Real programmers are language agnostic. Anyways what's the project?

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 104 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We're writing an online banking service entirely in brainfuck. Backend, frontend, even middleend if we have to

[–] Deebster 64 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I enjoy the contradiction of middleend

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The middlemiddle

E: My backend don't middlemiddle, it forks

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 81 points 3 days ago

For something you're getting paid for, sure. But if you're contributing in your free time for fun or whatever, presumably you'd prefer to use a language you actually like.

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes and no. "Real" programmers care about engineering choices ; and JS is the cardboard of programming languages.

Perfect for packaging (which in this metaphor is UI), horrible for building a bridge with. And vice-versa, I wouldn't try and make amazon packaging out of reinforced concrete.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TeamAssimilation 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Real programmers will write in a way that user’s resources are not being wasted because you need a full browser, a JS runtime, and DOM juggling, to show even the simplest application.

It’s not rare for simple JS applications to consume over half a gigabyte of RAM on startup, and way more CPU than their native counterparts. That this was normalized and even defended is stupid.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 54 points 3 days ago

I think you’re thinking of Electron apps, but that’s not really a criticism of JavaScript, that’s a criticism of Electron. There are plenty of JS platforms that don’t require a browser/DOM. React Native is the biggest example. Also, GJS if you want native Linux apps.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago

Node does not require an excessive amount of resources.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Real programmers are language agnostic

Thought terminating sentence.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Redkey@programming.dev 57 points 3 days ago (1 children)

JS has saved me many hours of mind-numbing, error-prone manual keyboard work by giving me a way to hack together a simple bit of automation as a web page.

Even when a computer has been ham-fistedly locked-down by an overzealous IT department, I can almost always still access a text editor and a browser that will load local HTML files.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 24 points 3 days ago

Add to that the beauty of bookmarklets.

It's silly that IT departments forces us to resort to techniques used before browser extensions became a thing, and it's ironic that it's because they don't know how to code, but here we are.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Javascript turn our computers into toasters

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SethranKada@lemmy.ca 50 points 3 days ago (22 children)

Feels the same whenever a project is written in python, but I uninstall it too.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

JavaScript really depends on the people writing it restricting themselves to a sane (ish) subset, just like C++

My personal gripe with JavaScript is how horribly slow it is. C++ at least has the merit of being fast once compiled. I wouldn't feel great contributing to a JS project knowing fully well that a rewrite in a faster language would be 10x as effective as anything I could improve as is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lonlazarus@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Prissy little programmers

load more comments
view more: next ›