this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

10687 readers
436 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The chart:

See the article for their thoughts/analysis

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I've been keeping an eye on Burnaby. In 2023 they created a municipal housing authority to build public housing which will, in my opinion, do a lot to fix housing affordability. Once their buildings actually start getting built, assuming they don't fuck it up, maybe I could move back to civilization.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

It's extremely naive to think building more housing will make housing cheaper. Cities like Vancouver and Toronto wil never tell you how many empty houses and condos are sitting unused on speculation.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

What makes Burnaby interesting is the nature of the housing that the BHA is building. That is to say, public, non-market housing.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Tax empty houses and watch them get filled up so quickly.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 13 hours ago

That's fucked... I can't ever move unless I want to change my entire lifestyle and by that I mean eating food.

no matter where I'd move I'm paying well over double what I pay now.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 10 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

The solution is to ban foreign ownership and anything that is foreign owned needs to be sold within 12 months or it becomes property of the state.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 1 points 50 minutes ago

Foreign ownership is a red herring.

You actually want to end this? End the principle residence tax exemption.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I would also say that no one should have any more than 2 parcels of land, anymore gets taxed heavily to make renting not worth it.

Businesses should also have a limit on how many properties they own. Shouldn't be able to create a Blackstone situation where they own a good portion of all properties in an area.

Limit it by # of properties of hectares/acres in area.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 hours ago

Very good ideas

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is proven bullshit. The problem is thousands of Terry and Barb Boomers investing in real estate speculation.

Next, blame immigrants.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 hours ago

Proven? Show me the data.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Foreign ownership of housing is a small part of the issue.

spoilerGraph showing type of investors purchasing property in Canada

(Source)

Canadians are very content to collect rents from each other. You could ban foreign ownership entirely and it won't make housing affordable.

[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

No, the solution is that corporations are banned from owning housing, and no individual be allowed to own more than 2 properties.

Housing being a portfolio asset and not a necessity is what has caused this mess, not foreign influence.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

CRA needs to stop making real estate a tax haven. But we are now so over leveraged as a country, any changes would collapse Canada into a failed state. >80% of all the wealth in this country is now trapped in real estate.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Agreed, But also, non-citizens should never own property

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

but chinese money is too good to miss for canada though.

[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Workaround : a company bought it, Investors are in another couple of offshore company, no names.

This game has been played by money Laundering folks a d foreign investment companies, sounds good as a headline but putting it in practice is way harder.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No corporation should be able to possess a single-family home. It’s pretty easy to tell when something’s a shell company for a foreign owner. Just do it. The government needs to get off it’s fucking ass

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone disagrees, you're just about 35 years too late.

When corporations were starting to claim "rights" as a person would in the early 90s, many people objected loudly. Money is louder.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I’m not about 35 years too late. I’m saying we take it and if they have a Problem… They can go to a court and get rejected. And if the court doesn’t reject them, break the legs of the court. Do it French style.

Of course, that won’t happen… Whatever the States are doing as well should be expected in about five or 10 years.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I see. We're describing our fantasy solutions.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 hours ago

Right, because there are no solutions anymore. No policies will ever pass that hurt the rich.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 hours ago

Perfect. Grab it up.