this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
173 points (98.9% liked)

Political Weirdos

1257 readers
476 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You can't make this shit up.

Indiana state Sen. Chris Garten acknowledged the backlash and labeled his critics ‘snowflakes’

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/chris-garten-indiana-christmas-post-b2890729.html

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] not_me@piefed.social 1 points 28 minutes ago

Charly Kirk 2 ?

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 31 points 10 hours ago

But... Why beat up Santa? Santa is unanimously considered the good guy. Who was this for?

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 12 hours ago

Regular evil just wasn't enough for the republican party, they had to go cartoonishly, comically evil

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 62 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

“When you find out the North Pole is trying to bring more bureaucratic overreach & unfunded mandates down the chimney disguised as “Christmas cheer.” Not on my watch,” the Republican posted on his X account Thursday morning.

“We The People run Indiana, not the bureaucrats,” he added. “Take it back to the North Pole big guy.”

Is this the fabled right-wing comedy I've been hearing so little about?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 14 hours ago

He attempted the mythical third conservative joke. He failed.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 18 points 12 hours ago

So he’s against both Santa and snowflakes. Sounds like he just hates Christmas.

[–] whitecollarcry@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Starbucks needs to sue this man

[–] Steve@communick.news 46 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

[he] acknowledged the backlash and labeled his critics ‘snowflakes’

I'm not offended or bothered by it.
It's just super werid, and I don't understand the message he's trying to make. Like is he against capitalist consumer culture? Is he fighting Santa because Christmas is for Jesus? Or is Santa socialized gifting, and he's for capitalism? Or does he just want to look like a superhero beating up someone, and didn't think through who he was beating up?

[–] mrbeano@lemmy.zip 13 points 13 hours ago

Yes, I just don't even get what he thought he was trying to do.

Look, we all know he's acting out some daddy issues, but as a politician your daddy issues should at least be used to make a coherent point. To someone.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Or when he's beating him up... Santa did his fucking job already the night before you stupid dumb fuck. Why are you beating him up the next fucking morning?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 12 hours ago

Probably something to do with not getting what he wished for. Somehow I'm reminded of Eric Cartman now.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Because they believe in vengeance not justice

The war on Christmas is getting brutal.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago

Make a fake picture of me beating up someone that is viewed favorably by 90% of the country. That will help shore up my support. Then have someone inject me with my insulin and help me swallow my Viagra before my 1pm appointment at the child brothel

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 16 points 14 hours ago

I don't know what's funnier, his bare arms (for some reason?) or this response to the backlash. He's not a bright bulb.

“Lots of intolerance, swearing, and outrage on display over a few AI pics I had a blast designing with my kids,” Garten said. “Some of you clowns are just insufferable. Hopefully your negativity stays in the comments and not directed at your families.”

“Merry Christmas, snowflakes!” he added.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 15 hours ago

Calling the Coca Cola mascot adopted into tradition a "symbol of Christian generosity" is a bit of a stretch but its more bizarre to claim that beating up said mascot is symbolic of being politically opposed to bureaucratic overreach.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

The war on Christmas is coming from inside the bicameral.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 9 points 14 hours ago

That's weird, they're all white. Isn't that interesting?

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

He’s just missing the Chippendale’s cuffs.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Imagine trying to explain this to your kid.

[–] compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 14 hours ago

Just when you think Republicans can’t top themselves

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 15 hours ago

He was probably referencing Atlas Shrugged. You know, the bit that was originally a titan of industry monologuing about wanting to kill Jesus Christ because he represented the evil of altruism, until Rand’s editors made her change it.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Wow that is... Very real looking.

[–] ArachnidMania@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm thinking it's photoshop over some AI crowds, santas in mostly the same pose for the batch of photos, and the AI blurry weirdness only seems to show up in the crowds to me.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Same pose, different angles. I suppose the kids may have done it, but that looks like some finely done isolation and head swapping if they're pasted over the crowd. Plus, all that kicked up snow? I've never been like a Hollywood level photoshopper, but this seems pretty difficult. Maybe I'm out of touch though.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Not be that guy, but it's really not that hard for the snow. You layer with different opacity levels and 2 different paint brushes in white.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago

This guy sucks and all, but I unironically fucking love this.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 14 hours ago

I, for one, am extremely impressed by his manliness.