this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
664 points (98.8% liked)

News

34074 readers
4248 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 185 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Move sparks praise but chain says hotel independently operated and cancellations ‘not reflective of Hilton values’

I thought official press statements were supposed to cast the brand in a good light.

“Hilton’s position is clear: Our properties are open to everyone and we do not tolerate any form of discrimination.”

Words just don't mean anything anymore, do they?

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 115 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We do not tolerate any form of discrimination apparently means We provide hospitality to the worst perpetrators of discrimination

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

We like money no matter how evil the source.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It means "We won't discriminate between people who give us money. Whether they kill each other afterword is none of our concern."

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

That is what they mean by it, but the fact they chose to express it as "not tolerating discrimination" as opposed to "not discriminating" or "not engaging in discrimination" really highlights that they are engaging in the social contract of tolerance with entities that are explicitly breaking said contract. This kind of weak willed "inclusion" for the sake of virtue signalling/profit is part of what makes fascists think that the paradox of tolerance is some killer argument against empathy

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago

"We want everyone to know that we value profit so much over human life that we'd literally gleefully house the Gestapo if we could make a penny out of it." - Hilton Hotels

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Lost a chance to lock in my business for life.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But in a good light to who?

Us, the crowd that ended up finding the fediverse? No.

They are cozying up to another hotel owner.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I debated it, I really did.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you can replace it with "him/her," then it's whom. If you can replace it with he/she, then it's who

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Professor Prole in da houesssssse!

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

So they are cool with nazi conventions and stuff? Yikes.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

yeah I don't get how they thought that statement looks good for them

in any case, I'll start booking my business trips at a different hotel

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 86 points 4 days ago (3 children)

“They have taken immediate action to resolve this matter and are contacting impacted guests to ensure they are accommodated,” Hilton’s spokesperson said. “Hilton’s position is clear: Our properties are open to everyone and we do not tolerate any form of discrimination.”

A physical manifestation of the Paradox of Tolerance. I wonder how many staff members of that hotel decided to quit suddenly.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 29 points 4 days ago

decided to quit suddenly.

I dunno about quitting - it's not really the season for that - but I'll bet that Flu bug going around hit a bunch of them for a week or two.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago

I wonder how many staff members of that hotel decided to quit suddenly

That might be your only option depending on your citizen status. You really do not want to be deported by ICE and ICE will totally deport that latin looking maid.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

I wonder how many staff members are Hispanic immigrants. Is ICE just gonna save those for last because they're changing their sheets for them, and round them all up the morning before they move on to somewhere else?

[–] Vertelleus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 4 days ago (6 children)

They backpetaled:

The company then pointed to a statement on Everspeak Hospitality’s website, saying this was the respective hotel. “Everpeak Hospitality has moved swiftly to address this matter as it was inconsistent with our policy of being a welcoming place for all. We are in touch with the impacted guests to ensure they are accommodated. We do not discriminate against any individuals or agencies and apologize to those impacted,” the statement said.

Actual Link: https://www.404media.co/hilton-hotel-that-refused-dhs-reservations-backpedals/
Archive Link: https://archive.ph/e3TJN

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago

it was inconsistent with our policy of being a welcoming place for all

Where nazis are welcome, no one else is.

[–] SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social 42 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Phew, they almost had balls. That was a close one.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 days ago

Local management did. Corpos always go with the $$$.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

They know most people don't read past headlines. They got the good headline.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They still got disowned and dumped by Hilton corporate:

Hilton removing MN hotel that denied ICE bookings from its system

Corporate scumbags throwing the hotel owner under the bus so they can continue profiting from the Gestapo. How can a hotel full of ICE thugs be a welcoming place for all?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They're better off not being attached to a Nazi-loving corp anyway.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

One would think. They probably now owe Hilton a fortune and still have to pay to rebrand everything.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 days ago

a welcoming place for all

Lol right.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 5 points 4 days ago

a welcoming place for nazis

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

They should just behave like Trump's admin: making a statement while actually not doing anything to "accomodate the guests", keep taking their reservations and cancel them at the last minute again, for a different bullshit reason every time.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 59 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I really hope it was a last minute cancel like saw the guy walking in the door last minute

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

“Oh heeeeeeeelllll no”

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Trump is going for the rare Third Amendment Constitutional crisis

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It actually doesn’t have a lot of case law. He just might

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

Trump challenging the constitution like a parent dealing with a misbehaving kid.

1......2.......

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This makes me wonder how much money a day our taxes are paying in hotel rooms for people who we have already paid for their offices/bases for them. Seems like a giant waste of money for areas that don't want them there.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That was a topic I saw going around before Trump's election, people had done some math for that. When he stays in places like Trump Tower and all the secret service etc do too we are paying millions of dollars in taxes to fund luxury vacations essentially, to people that are also getting paid for it by taxes.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

That's called Capitalism, boys. The Free Market rules.

[–] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I suspect that front office manager may have fucked up. Seems like a big decision that should be sent out through the gm or marketing.

[–] silvadinlabop@lemmy.cafe 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] silvadinlabop@lemmy.cafe 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don’t understand why a corporate GM would be at an independently operated hotel. Marketing doesn’t need to be involved in canceling some reservations. ICE is just making a big deal out of this because they are little bitch babies. Get another hotel. Sleep in a barn. Jump off a cliff. Whatever.

[–] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Not a corporate gm. The property general manager. If you are denying the government lodging that's a big deal. They are owned by the everpeak resort group. They have there own layer of marketing and possibly a government relations person. Front office manager is usually a very limited scope.

[–] silvadinlabop@lemmy.cafe 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I suppose. They (ICE) better get used to being canceled though.

[–] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I agree fuck them!

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

We do not discriminate against any individuals or agencies

Really??? I mean depending on your definition of "agency", that might be a bad call.

Would you offer rooms to isis? What about illegal organizations in general? What about when you're unsure, but suspect that an organization may be illegal?

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I feel you may be thinking too deep on this one.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Well I mean, it's relevant. Especially if your policy was to disallow possibly illegal activities, it's not hard to make an argument that ICE engages in kidnapping and murder.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Good! Protect Omar!