I trust my billion-dollar a year law firm’s VPN to block out this nonsense; we've got clients who are way more worried about our security than the government sniffing around.
this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
312 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
83406 readers
4213 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Whereas not using a VPN will subject one to... domestic surveillance.
They spy on domestic communications too, with the 5 eyes arrangement, they have their allies scoop up the information and share it back with them, even as it's just the US doing the entire thing with a couple of foreign names on the masthead. Fucking lawyers.
For some unhinged reason, Trump wanted to kick Canada out of the five eyes last year, so as a response we just stopped sharing information with the US, and the US just kind of Kicked themselves out.
In contrast to not using a VPN, which subjects them to illegal surveillance already?
Americans may be inadvertently waiving the privacy protections they’re entitled to under the law…
LOL what privacy protections? The NSA has proven time and time again that they don't give a single shit about the law, certainly now more than ever.
What do I trust more: Legal protections nobody cares to enforce and could be a multi year battle in court, or well verified strong cryptography.
It's not the cryptography you have to trust. It's the other end of the tunnel. A free VPN most probably sells your data. Nobody offers free services for actually free.
I don't use free VPNs
In a letter sent Thursday to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, the lawmakers say that because VPNs obscure a user’s true location, and because intelligence agencies presume that communications of unknown origin are foreign, Americans may be inadvertently waiving the privacy protections they’re entitled to under the law.
Several federal agencies, including the FBI, the National Security Agency, and the Federal Trade Commission, have recommended that consumers use VPNs to protect their privacy. But following that advice may inadvertently cost Americans the very protections they’re seeking.
The letter was signed by members of the Democratic Party’s progressive flank: Senators Ron Wyden, Elizabeth Warren, Edward Markey, and Alex Padilla, along with Representatives Pramila Jayapal and Sara Jacobs.
There's a saying in Poland: "Robić kurwę z logiki" Which simultaneously can be translated as "To make a whore out of logic" Or "To turn the logic into a whore"
Oh nooo, we won't be protected by the law they can't be arsed to follow anyway? Whatever will I do when they surveil my encrypted VPN traffic?
Store now, decrypt later. Make sure your VPN is using quantum-safe encryption algorithms with perfect forward secrecy. They are storing ALL traffic that goes outside the country (probably domestic traffic too, realistically).
Don't you think that would take too much storage space?
They can probably use heuristics to keep the 0.1% most interesting traffic (eg traffic that flows towards servers that isn’t too large, that’d catch everything you send to your bank without breaking the budget to store)
what in the anti-VPN fearmongering is this bullshit?
So, I am a remote worker in Healthcare. Obviously, I need to use a VPN to connect to work to ensure that communication is secure. But because I have a job that requires secure access, I am a suspected domestic terrorist?
Suspect or not, you get the same surveillance treatment as suspected domestic terrorists do.
No, because there are different types of vpn connectivity.
A point to point vpn is what employees use to connect to the office. The intention is to encrypt the connection so a 3rd party can’t access ithe data going through it. The FBI/NSA won’t care about this type of vpn because your work knows who you are and logs all traffic generated by you which could be subpoenaed by the government.
Connecting to a vpn server in another country to then access the internet hides your original ip address, gets around geo-location blocks and the traffic is typically not logged by the vpn provider. This is the type of vpn governments don’t like.
I think it's somewhat naive to assume anything isn't being spied on by the NSA. They don't have a history of being picky.
Of course. I’m sure they are making use of plenty of bugs found in firewall software to access and monitor business traffic, but they can subpoena those logs at any time. It’s the private vpn clients where logs aren’t kept that they are most concerned about, hence why I was outlining the difference.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I don't get it.
Why should a Russian spy have to tell Americans anything?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Time to spread the free word of Tor to everyone.
but i2p
I wasn't crazy about i2p. I really loved Freenet and Zeronet
I don't give a shit.
They have been surveiling us for years. They just to maximize what they can collect.
Correct, and the FBI inadvertently admitted it publicly by releasing video in the Guthrie abduction case that shouldn't exist.
Every device with a wireless connection and a GPS, camera, or microphone is surveilling you.
view more: next ›