Strange Panzers lying in ponds distributing shells is no basis for a system of government…
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
821 points (99.0% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
41761 readers
5265 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Surely you don't think supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses?
As opposed to what, a farcical aquatic ceremony?
That was unexpected.
No one expects the python imposition!
I thought we were an autonomous collective
This is far too useful to be a shitpost.
I know right. I even open the calculator app to verify before committing to memory this nugget.
Barely, only if you choose round and small numbers. 67% of 347 or 347% of 67 which one is easier?
347 is pretty damn close to 350.
350% of 67 =3.5 x 67 ~ 180+21+33=234
SPEAK ENGLISH! Jeez
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
Yo what
So 50% of 50 is the same as 50% of 50. Both equal 5
And the other half is 0! 5 0
0! is 0.
Edit. I remembered wrong. Keeping it like this as it is funnier that way.
factorials are mostly encountered in combinatorics, which is problems like, how many ways are there to put 3 objects of different colors in a row? well, the first can be any of the 3, the second can be either of the other 2, and the last is whichever 1 is left, so 3×2×1=3!=6
so how many ways are there to put 0 objects in a row? well there's 1, it's this one:
that's why 0!=1
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Multiplication is commutative.
50% of 6 == 50/100 x 6 == (50 x 6)/100 == 50 x 6/100 == 6% of 50.
load more comments
(1 replies)
taking x% is just multiplying by x/100, and multiplication is commutative. x% of y is just y×x×1/100, which is the same as x×y×1/100
you can also ignore the % and divide by 100 at the end. for example, what's 5% of 5? that might take a minute to work out. what's 25/100? you instantly know it's 1/4
Percentages can be expressed as multiplication and multiplication is commutative (the order doesn't matter).
Fuck. I had to calculate 4% of 7 a few minutes ago and didn’t know this. I say fuck because it wouldn’t have helped me anyway.
6% of 50
6/100 * 50/1
(6 * 50) / (100 * 1)
(50 * 6) / (100 * 1)
50/100 * 6/1
50% of 6
Works for multiplying any fraction, not just percents.
2/3 of 5 is the same as 5/3 of 2.
2/5 of 7/8 is the same as 7/5 of 2/8.
Everyone’s talking about this math. I’m wondering about the panzer.
They said the water could reach up to 50% of its 1.7 meter height before causing problems, panzer tried calculating 1.7% of 50 meters from head, this is the result.
I was waiting in a car in front of a math tutoring building and was doing the math problems advertised on their window (as one does, of course) and the 7% of 250 is indeed probably easiest as 250% of 7, aka 2.5x7, which is 17.5.
I did it a few other ways, though. 7% of 1000 is 70, then divide by 4 for 17.5. Well, more like, divide by 2 for 35 and again for 17.5, but yeah... mental math is fun.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Another counter-intuitive percentage fact: A 10 percent discount and a 10 percent fee can be calculated in either order but they don't cancel out.
Example, 90% of (110% of 10) = 110% of (90% of 10). But neither of those is evaluates to 10. They evaluate to 9.9.
For any percentage X, and any base value C, (100 - X)% x ((100 + X)% x C) = (100 + X)% x ((100 - X)% x C) = (100 - (X^2/100))% x C
load more comments
(1 replies)
Let's try this on a sale item. Hmm, let's see, the sign says 25% off $6.99. So that's the same as, let's say, 7% off $25. Oh, yeah, that is much easier. /s
Wait...
So 25% off $100... is 100% off $25! Trollface
I mean if you remove the word off it works. 25% off $100 is $25 100% of 25 is 25 it's still reversible you just let the word off confuse you
You could also make sure to carry “off” to both sides when you swap:
25% off of $100 is 100% of $25 off
load more comments
(1 replies)
True mathematics derives from established mathematical theory, not some farcical aquatic armored vehicle!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Oh panzer of the lake, why am I still single?
Are you sure you can stand the answer?
Great for calculating tips!
Let's see: the bill was $138.72, so I just need 138.72% of 20. And we can subtract 100% and just add the 20 back at the end, then convert the percentage to a decimal so (.3872 * 20) + 20 = 7.744 + 20 or $27.74.
Easy!
I prefer taking 10% and doubling it for a 20% tip.
Take the total, moved the decimal one digit to the left, double it and round to the nearest dollar. I round up at the beginning and end as well which is either close enough or a dollar high if the change is small enough.
$138.72 > 139 > 13.9 > 27.8 > $28
Close enough!
load more comments
(2 replies)
I always just do 10% (easy because you move the decimal one place) and then either double that or add half of it to itself for a 15-20% tip.
For sure. Reversing the percentages here makes this far more difficult. I just felt we needed to shittify this post a little.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I hate math so much.
Thank you for this
It was recently discovered that all AI everywhere was connected to the Panzer all along. /s
How is 17% of 83.27 easier then 83.27% of 17?
Oddly, yes.
Percentages also add together in partials. As in 10%+5%+2% = 17%
So, you start with the 10% by moving the decimal over 83.27 becomes 8.327
Then add half of that (5%) to its self and get 12.49 (rounded)
Then take the 10% number and move the decimal over once more (1%) for 0.833 and double it (from 1% to 2%) and get 1.666 and add that to your running total to get your answer of 14.16 (rounding)
And when I calculator check this I got 14.1559.
Just always convert the percentage to a decimal, and it’s easy either way.
0.06x50 is as easy as 0.5x6. They’re both just 5x6.
All these comments like “What about 47% of 3.11?” Well, yeah, of course it’s harder to multiply two- and three-digit numbers than it is to multiply single-digit numbers.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›