this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
225 points (99.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Death to America

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 83 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Libs get real offended if you just flatly say that Israel does not have a right to defend itself.

Yes, obviously, what Israel is now doing is in no way defensive but taking their dishonest framing and directly rejecting it is good too.

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 49 points 2 years ago

israel doesn't even have the right to exist

[–] FactuallyUnscrupulou@hexbear.net 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My absolute favorite is to hit them with even more religious bullshit. "As a devout Catholic I cannot deny Jesus of Nazareth is the rightful King of Israel and his kingdom will reign through the hearts of all; it transcends borders, language and culture. To acknowledge another Israel would be against the practice of the church."

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago
[–] Civility@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'd stay away from using catholic doctrine to justify opposition to Zionism.

Like, the material is absolutely there, but that's mainly because for the last thousand years it was the primary ideological basis for European antisemitism.

[–] D3FNC@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We hear you, we see you, but our hands are tied.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Libs get real offended if you just flatly say that Israel does not have a right to defend itself.

liberal discourse about "rights" always misses the point anyway. Israel has always used the idea that it guarantees more "democratic rights" than the surrounding Arab states as evidence that it has measurehead SVPERIOR CVLTVRE frothingfash etc. etc.

Israel has the power to defend itself. Where does it get that power? From the imperial core states (especially NATO/EU members) pouring money into it. Why do they do that? Because settler colonies are forward operating bases for imperial core capitalists. You can set up a situation where people have "equal rights" on paper, but in practice, violence decides what the actual material conditions are. Segregation in the united states always claimed to be "separate but equal" even as black people were made to suffer systemic discrimination (and continue to be made to suffer obviously)

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

Libs get real offended if you just flatly say that Israel does not have a right to defend itself.

Saw someone do this on Sky News of all places today lmao, interviewer didn't know how to react.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 63 points 2 years ago (1 children)

thinking about those videos of huge crowds of settlers at Ben Gurion queueing to flee to where their other passport is from

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 50 points 2 years ago (1 children)

my opinion about israel is the same as my opinion about the US took-restraint

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago

marg bar, as the kids say

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It's a fun thing to say, I'm sure. But it honestly upsets me to see others so willingly and happily wish death upon others. I don't actually wish death on anyone, it's just a sad and unfortunate necessity because oppressors like Israel and the US make it the only means of self-defence.

[–] mar_k@hexbear.net 44 points 2 years ago (4 children)

i agree the "1000 october 7s" aka 1.2 million dead people part is concerning me a bit, even if it's hyperbole. like, we can recognize violence is often a necessary means to liberation without rooting for maximum violence?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 years ago (8 children)

It's a cope. The necessary violence is really hard psychologically, people loop around to becoming hyperviolent as a way to deal with it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i agree the "1000 october 7s" aka 1.2 million dead people

so-far dead settlers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phish@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, comments like that just make liberal psychos feel more justified calling the left pro-hamas instead of pro-palestine. I don't think it's particularly productive.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Liberal psychos will always feel justified in everything they do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

I would far rather they see the error of their ways and leave the stolen land in peace

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unlimited 9/11s on the first world

Unlimited 10/7s on the Zionist entity

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago

Unlimited 1/6s on dork libs

[–] Finger@hexbear.net 42 points 2 years ago

no more half measures walter

[–] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (39 children)

To me the true tragedy is if Mesopotamia and the Levant formed into one nation like the Arabs in the area wanted, we would have Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine all as one nation. Even if 7 million Jews moved there, they would not be able to dominate their partitioned region. The colonial mandates of the late 19th century and early 20th century is what caused this violence, now we’re just going to live it out until the status quo can eventually change. May the communists win this century

[–] jabrd@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago

It always goes back to the British ukkk

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] oktherebuddy@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

idk why I don't hear anybody saying this but "from the river to the sea" is compatible with a one state solution of reintegration a la South Africa. Yes there will be internal violence. Yes the settlers will run and hide in gated communities within gated communities. Yes it will take over 100 years to become something resembling a normal country.

[–] dronebama@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You’re cute for thinking that the solution for Israel will be as mild as it was for South Africa. The settlers will be removed and that won’t be pretty, they cannot exist peacefully with the Palestinians they treated as subhuman for more than 80 fucking years, it’s worse than South Africa, Apartheid pales in comparison to what’s happening in Palestine, Palestine is the equivalent of an open air concentration camp. And after that the Americans are next on the chopping block in terms of decolonial struggle and they will probably get nuked if I’m making predictions here. The future is going to be violent, as communists we can only assume world war three is inevitable and we should take individual action to insulate ourselves from the literal fallout. Comrades, I have a bunker full of beans, if you ask nicely, you can have them.

[–] biden@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago (5 children)

it’s worse than South Africa, Apartheid pales in comparison to what’s happening in Palestine, Palestine is the equivalent of an open air concentration camp

Fully agree this is far more extreme than South Africa, plus South Africa was <15% white, while a one state Palestine would be around 50% Jewish (and far more Palestinians than Israelis are under 18). Imo, the ideal coexistence would be administered by an eastern/global southern power, but however it's brought about, you'd need to abolish the current fascist "law of return" and give the Palestinian diaspora (over 6 million people, mostly in Jordan and Syria) right of return, reparations, etc.

Obviously deport all first generation settlers (>20% of Israel's current population) back to America and Europe, but it gets more complicated for a lot of people born there, and wouldn't really solve much imo. For one, roughly half or more of Israeli Jews are Arab Jews/Mizrahi (which would surprise some people seeing how white their government is). This is largely because, 1) intermarriage between Ashkenazis and Mizrahis has become common (if one of your parents are Ashkenazi and another Mizrahi, you're just considered Mizrahi), and 2) immigration, coercion, and kidnapping of Arab Jews from other countries was a big thing.

Mizrahis are indigenous to the Middle East, but they've essentially had their culture stolen and been forcibly assimilated. So "deporting all settlers" wouldn't solve much and would be pretty complicated to define. While Mizrahis aren't settlers, they've been indoctrinated their entire lives in the same way Ashkenazi Israelis are, and even attempt to prove themselves to the settlers by being even more fascist in a lot of cases. So unfortunately, any resistance and violence from settlers would be equally if not more likely from indigenous Mizrahis either way.

As sick and fascist as the Zionist entity is, I don't think South Africa style reintegration is a pipe dream. You have a lot of examples in history of this, look at reconciliation after the Rwandan genocide for one.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From every river to every sea Palestine will be free

[–] Venus@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago

From the Nile to the Pacific cat-vibing

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 25 points 2 years ago

From the river to the sea!

[–] M68040@hexbear.net 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Two things I hate are colonialism and the influence of American Evangelical eschatology on geopolitics. Guess where both overlap

[–] NATOSleeperCell@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bring back downvotes because jesus christ, this thread isn't doing anything except wasting anima into terminally online , self-righteous navel gazing. Listen OP, I have had to grapple and coming to terms with America massacring millions of my people but signing every one of your posts and comments with "death to America" regardless of how just it might be in intent or how you mean it, simply comes across as provocatively inflammatory and trying to get rise out of others. If someone acted like you posted, I'd think they were a fed, or they were a late teen channelling some other source of repent energy into this. Its a red flag either way, and I'm not sure at all what it does. No Palestinians or Middle Easterners I know have the opinion you quoted, even as aggrieved as they are.

[–] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago

nah it's not really that deep. i just fuckin hate america

Death to America

[–] OrionsMask@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Imagine choosing "Death to America" as the thing to get upset about. Fuck you.

Death to America

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cromalin@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

what if i said 1001? what then?

load more comments
view more: next ›