this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
392 points (96.2% liked)

Not The Onion

22409 readers
787 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 135 points 1 week ago (30 children)

100% fruit juices would remain exempt

Why?? Shit’s sugar. You’re not getting most of the nutritional benefit from juice, all the fiber has been removed.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My guess is because it's unsweetened, and that the tax applies to drinks with added sugar or sweetener.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 1 week ago (21 children)

‘We should reduce sugar and sweetener consumption, let’s not tax this drink that’s almost pure sugar because it’s natural’ is asinine. Apple juice has virtually identical sugar content to a soda.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not true, the tax apply to unsweetened milk alternatives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Because like all laws, corruption came into the process to make it miss the goal entirely.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago

because they aren't purtity testing their legislation and added sugar and added artificial sweeteners is their current target, it's a start ffs

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] linsenchip@piefed.zip 91 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The minister of finance clarified that the tax will not apply to sugar free drinks

https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/zuckersteuer-172.html

[–] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (7 children)

O lol that's fairly recent tho. Yesterday they were all saying: hurr durr the drinking of sweet tasting things should be curbed and I almost punched the narrator via TCP/IP

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The UK has had this for a while. I will be honest in that I still miss the taste of full sugar drinks, that's definitely a downgrade, however after so many years of having these other drinks available I've lately found full sugar to be just... Too much.

Some artificial sugars do a number on my gut though. Been drinking more healthier things as a result, though overall I suppose the sugar tax has had a positive effect?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Some artificial sugars do a number on my gut though

Do not eat any substantial amounts of candy containing xylitol. Stuff is a laxative, and lots of sugar-free candy and gum uses it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xylitol

Adverse effects

Humans

When ingested at high doses, xylitol and other polyols may cause gastrointestinal discomfort, including flatulence, diarrhea, and irritable bowel syndrome (see Metabolism above); some people experience the adverse effects at lower doses.[21][36] Xylitol has a lower laxation threshold than some sugar alcohols but is more easily tolerated than mannitol and sorbitol.[37]

[–] simbico@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

Its also poisonous to pets, just fyi

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's that LA Beast video on YouTube where he goes through a large bag of sugar free haribo bears and develops an excellent relationship with his toilet. After reading hilarious Amazon reviews about how they're a laxative.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unabart@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’m gonna go broke when they introduce the Spicy Tax.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago

Fuck you and your döner

  • Bundestag, probably
[–] python@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Ordering "ohne scharf" because you're weak ❌
Ordering "ohne scharf" because you can't afford it ✅

[–] peacepath@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It is a good way to tax the poors while pretending it is ethical and for public health… May the poors would be healthier if they have less money?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Today I learned y’all dumb as fuck. What’s wrong with the comments?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 27 points 1 week ago

"But there isn't even sugar in this!"

"Yeah, but you still suck, so you're paying anyway."

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

If they're really going to tax sugar-free drinks (and not even use the money for healthcare) then it's obviously going to be another tax on being poor, like the increase of the value added tax that they are also planning.

Just what we asked for. Tax increases that are going to do nothing to the overly rich and instead hurt regular people. And then they wonder why people turn to political extremism.

[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

The Union really doing their upmost to have the AFD seem more appealing for the uneducated, reactionary conservatives.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They always fumble stuff like this on purpose. A bag of nuts has the worst nutri score ever, a deep frozen pizza is a B.

Lobbyists the answer is lobbyists. The government is very corrupt here, especially the current one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

> Invents Spezi, the best beverage there is
> Invents Shorle, the best beverage type there is
> Taxes the shit out of them
I see what you did here

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It is not about "sugar-free". It is about added artifical sweeteners. Not that one thinks they would add sugar tax to e.g. sparkling water...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›