Firefox users right now:
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
945 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
87833 readers
2605 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Google's going to lengths and bounds to make people leave it.
This is gonna be so bad because now there is only uBlock origin lite and "uBlock", if you couln't guess: the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove(it's been up for some years IIRC) and i am sure that everyone will try to install this scam because they can't find the original uBlock origin (and everyone just refers to uBlock origin as uBlock which makes it worse)
the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove
It's a little more complicated. uBlock was the original name, gorhil handed it off when he felt the maintenance burden became too high. Then he forked it to make his own uBlock Origin version.
At some point later uBlock was bought up by the AdBlock people, who in turn were later bought by the AdBlock Plus people.
So it's not a scam exactly, more like an inbred sideline of the royal family.
It’s a scam because it specifically goes out of its way to not block an ad, as long as that ad pays a bribe to them. It should be called uAd.
Holy shit, seems to be watching a soap opera tf
load more comments
(2 replies)
Anyone that uses Chrome doesn't know what a clean non ad infested website looks like so they won't notice the difference.
load more comments
(13 replies)
company which makes most of it's revenue from advertising fucks with their browser's ability to remove ads. Go figure!
i am surprised it took this long, but i know that getting everybody using chromium, or at least webextensions, was part of the plan that had to exist first. and the path down mv3 started not long after both mozilla and microsoft were both roped-in.
load more comments
(5 replies)
ublock origin lite, the natural replacement but not automatically enabled by google or microsoft. you have to go get it. https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home
an alternative is adguard's browser extension. it is free to use and open source (gpl). https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension#installation
No you get Firefox
And i removed Chrome from my devices
I think I'll be switching to librewolf at home. It can install mozilla extensions and comes with ublock origin baked in. Pulling a stunt like this is just going to drive people away from the Chrome environment. Corpos can't help but shoot themselves in the foot.
Most people I know simply don't care. They will use it because it's convenient and they don't care about the privacy dangers. I can't comprehend it myself though. Drives me up the wall.
They will use it because it's convenient
Using web without ublock is amongst the most inconvenient things I've experienced
I think most people who don't know better just think that's "the internet" and that it's the same no matter how you access it. The whole concept of browsers and extensions is just not in the realm of concern.
I've seen some shift among the tech illiterate in my immediate vicinity, but most are still in the "I got nothing to hide" category of clueless twits.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Given how long ago this was announced, anybody still using Chrome doesn't care.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Chrome? What is that?
A thin layer of chromium on the surface of a metal to make it shiny and protect from corrosion.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
Install Firefox with https://adnauseam.io/, it's basically ublock origin but internally clicks on every add destroying your adds profile and damaging economics of adds and conversion.
Doesn't this just track the shit out of you? Does it also click malicious ad banners?
load more comments
(12 replies)
firefox became bloated so switched to chrome because faster/better. back to firefox last year. too old to keep fighting ads. thinking off button will be next. yeah addons mostly work
What's "bloated" about Firefox?
nobody ever seems to detail what kinda bloat they mean when they say that, i don't think they actually thought about it that deeply. nobody complains about anything specific like XUL support, for example.
In my experience, there was a period when Firefox crashed all over the place, especially under heavy load. Tabs shared the same process back then, one tab could take down whole the browser session when crashed. I vividly remember how it felt so silky when i switched to chrome. Now I am back to Firefox since 3 years. Firefox is the sexier now with all the shiny addons
load more comments
(4 replies)
I switched to Chrome back then because it ran tabs in separate processes. A tab crashing in Firefox would take the whole browser down.
The final straw for me was the plugins. Flash, Java, Acrobat, etc. Chrome kept them up to date for you. Firefox made you just through hoops, which eventually lead to a rogue site injecting crap onto my machine which took me a day to clean up. Plugins are pretty much dead now, but back then you needed them for half the web to work.
Chrome really was a great browser back then (and MS were still in the "what's wrong with Internet Explorer?" era), and it's a shame that they're now working so hard to fuck it up again.
Chrome did a bunch of things absolutely wonderfully in the beginning. Fast JavaScript engine, removed title bar (tabs on top), simple settings page, sandboxed tabs, and they made some of the functionality of the most popular Firefox extensions the default (such as the downloads bar, instead of a separate window).
It was basically a pre-modded Firefox, but supercharged. Now it's corporate slop.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Edge will soon follow. They announced it. Polly will switch to helium or brave
Brave is kinda shady with their whole cryptocurrency thing, Helium seems fine but it’s still based on Chromium. I’ve been recommending people check out Librewolf
Simple Firefox is perfectly fine.
Ungoogled Chromium is my standby for the instances when a Blink browser is needed, though it's not entirely simple to set up.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Or better yet LibreWolf
Or better yet LibreWolf
I cannot count how many things I had to change in settings to get the browser to just work right, I mean I appreciate them locking everything down to the nth degree but.. damn. Finally switched to waterfox, the out of the box experience is a lot friendlier.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
I still rock NoScript. It helps avoid drive-bys and other silliness. It does take patience though so I get why not many like it.
Damn it.
Gotta use chrome at work.
Firefox "isn't secure and isn't supported" - my it director
isnt secure... tell you dont understand security without telling me you don't understand security.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(22 replies)
so it ~~begins~~ continues...
Sing it with me:
Chrome, huh, yeah.
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing, uhh….
view more: next ›