Most policing of other people's behavior is for your own personal benefit, so whatever makes it most likely for the autistic person to behave in the desired way is the "right way" to call it.
Shame and being ostracized are just ways to make sure no one else falls out of line.
It'll continue until it stops working. We need to be individually brave and support each other against stuff like this, and I think all will turn out fine :)
Stop having a goal with women specifically. You talking about experience and success with women is literally the total opposite of what makes sense.
Just have fun with a person. You have had fun interacting with people before, right? Just do that. The literal only difference is that you can sprinkle in some sexual innuendos or some shit, if you think of it. If not, also fine. Then go home and resume what you always do. Repeat.
If while doing this you ever notice some sexual tension, just do something sexual. Touch them. Or tell them you find them attractive. Or ask to kiss them. Whatever, it literally doesn't matter. If they don't like it, you'll likely notice because they tell you and then you can do something different. If they like it, you'll also likely notice, and continue escalating from there. Touching platonic -> kissing -> making out hair/neck/back-> touching sexually titties/butt -> touching pussy. Natural progression.
If you notice something afterwards, while thinking about it (like someone giving you obvious signals that you completely missed), if you can, just respond to the signal as soon as you notice, don't think "now it's too late". In fact, it's never to late until you tried it and it didn't work.
But yeah, I can't stress this enough. The most important thing is to not expect anything. In fact, maybe you'll never have sexual contact again. It's best if you're content with nothing but masturbating for the rest of your life.
No, only those who imprison people for peaceful protest.
I think it's a non-issue, because from context everyone will know if the instance or you are meant.
Should've maybe called the instance something different entirely if you didn't want that problem :D
I mean you can just ventilate whenever you spill something.
The larger problem would be the entire water-based ecosystem.
There's constant mentions about "I read your report", so yes, I assume they communicate most routine things by mail.
That's my main argument as well. Doesn't it go against the entire concept of this server to take user's choice away? Instance blocking is super simple, if anyone doesn't want to see it, they can, without it needing to be enforced on everyone.
The only reason for defederation should be admin overhead, i.e. an instance creates so much rule-breaking content that it can't be handled any other way by admins.
Binding the interface is definitely the recommended way to go about it, it was in some manual when I first informed myself about torrenting. But it's not required and easy to miss if you don't consume correct resources, it's not obvious.
Extra protein, have fun.
Aber ernsthaft, warum nicht drauf scheißen und trotzdem kochen?
HTML/CSS/JS is just a possible frontend technology. It doesn't really matter if your frontend is written in that or written in Qt or whatever. What matters in the end is that the developers are good ones. If the developers suck, the frontend will suck.
There aren't many good developers.
Was about to say... "said by an Instagram model who eats 1 grape a day"
stfu
;)