this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
126 points (99.2% liked)

news

23464 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 85 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope China calls the bluff and lets TikTok be banned, leading to the Gen Z Uprising

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just gunna be a bunch of VPN users. Great move USA

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 82 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Some congressperson is going to be assassinated by a Gen Z terrorist cell and I'll be like squidward-chill

[–] SteamedHamberder@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

Putting the Zs in Leon Czolgosz

[–] neroiscariot@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

We're quickly going to learn if gizmos and doohickeys are protected by the 2nd amendment

[–] Yor@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

Multiple would be great!

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

I disagree with adventurism usually but that would be worth it just because it would be funny.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're not even trying to hide the fact they just want TikTok to be Westoid-owned.

Purely just a question of capital flow, they don't care about surveillance.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The context is a chef's kiss.

The US isn't just reauthorizing its surveillance laws - it's vastly expanding them | Caitlin Vogus | The Guardian

The US House of Representatives agreed to reauthorize a controversial spying law known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act last Friday without any meaningful reforms, dashing hopes that Congress might finally put a stop to intelligence agencies’ warrantless surveillance of Americans’ emails, text messages and phone calls.

The vote not only reauthorized the act, though; it also vastly expanded the surveillance law enforcement can conduct. In a move that Senator Ron Wyden condemned as “terrifying”, the House also doubled down on a surveillance authority that has been used against American protesters, journalists and political donors in a chilling assault on free speech.

[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody has ever explained to me why any person in the US should care about a government with no jurisdiction over them might conduct surveillance on them. The government that worries me is the one that has power over me. Maybe I’m stupid, though.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

One reason could be because that other government may not be bound to rules regarding surveillance on people who are not citizens of their country, thus can't be held accountable, and then that government could share that information with anyone they want including that government where the person is a citizen.

But then I'm just describing Five Eyes and US surveillance again anyway.

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 60 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can see TikTok calling their bluff and then Gen Z just using VPNs to get around it so now all the ad dollars flow exclusively to Chinese companies instead of American ones

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is what will happen

over 1.7 billion users as of 2023

TikTok has 150 million active monthly users in the United States.

I'm guessing that 1.7 billion number is prolly off due to bots and defunct accounts, but still, you don't sell your platform for 10% of your market lmao. I'm not sure if the US thought they would honestly back down just because they're America, if they wanted to ban it because they honestly think it's spying on Americans, or what exactly the play here was, but the obvious one (force them to sell to Americans) was laughably stupid and unlikely to happen for obvious reasons.

[–] AcidLeaves@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

tbh that 10% of the market probably contributes about ~30-40% of the revenue

Western users typical contribute >10x more revenue than all other users for adtech platforms, and just ~20-30% of users will contribute to 90% of the revenue (my source is my employers' internal analytics dashboard)

Here is Google's (note that rest of world includes all other developed countries too like Canada, Europe, Oceania, East Asia)

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't look like it

79% of revenue comes from China

8% of revenue comes from the US

Article is more current than the last one too, and that seems to track with what other sources say

[–] AcidLeaves@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's ByteDance's revenues (the parent company). TikTok is its own subsidiary that can't operate in China

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh interesting

Do we not really know revenue being generated that is directly attributable to Tik Tok?

[–] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh interesting

This was in fact brought up by Republicans questioning the CEO of TikTok. They asked him why (or said it was unfair that) the Chinese version of TikTok shows stuff like science, math, and limit children's usage of the app but the American one shows only mind numbing content lol (some of which he defined as pro Hamas, anti American content)

[–] AcidLeaves@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do we not really know revenue being generated that is directly attributable to Tik Tok?

It'd be unlikely that Tiktok shares this detailed of financials to us. I'd imagine that Google data above got leaked from a random employee, they have a ton of analytics open to all workers

[–] flan@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's also a better than zero chance US vassals will follow.

[–] AcidLeaves@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I actually don't see this tbh. Unlike India and US, no other Western-aligned country has a domestic industry in this area to protect and the EU really loves to fine tech giants for free money, so TikTok is overall good for them

[–] flan@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think 'good for them' is the thing that matters here though. The EU is a massive market for Instagram and we've seen first hand in recent years where EU leadership's loyalties lie.

It's possible they won't follow the US lead but I wouldn't be too surprised if they do.

[–] AcidLeaves@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good point... I'd imagine the list of countries that would follow is probably similar to the list of countries that banned Huawei

https://www.reuters.com/technology/european-countries-who-put-curbs-huawei-5g-equipment-2023-09-28/

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Better off without the Americans on the app anyway. The smarter ones will just use VPNs

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

If VPN providers are smart, they'll start advertising that you can use TikTok on them.

[–] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

ByteDance should start selling VPNs as a side business

[–] sempersigh@hexbear.net 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

ByteDance should simply take TikTok down and replace it a few days later with a new app called “Tik tok 2”

[–] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

Pretty similar to what US corporations do to shed pension liabilities…

[–] g_g@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

good-morning Tic Tac Too?

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago
[–] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

More tankie tik tok

[–] Guamer@hexbear.net 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The "aid" is to Israel/Ukraine isn't it

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] someone@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've always found it darkly comical that United States government policymakers, masters of the art of soft power in the first cold war, is now staffed with people who can't conceive why anyone would use soft power and always leaped to military options. They can't imagine the government of China continuing economic soft-power control over Taiwan for long-term reintegration purposes. Because US policymakers would never do such a thing themselves.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All the time I'm talking about the decay of imperial competency.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago

Banning tiktok dean-neutral

Banning tiktok AND supporting genocide dean-malice

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I'm gonna download tiktok out of principle. And probably never use it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sgtlion@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

It's like nationalisation except for private companies

[–] anaesidemus@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

they attached it to the bill??? like in Simpsons???

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Considering this includes an aid bill with it, would it pass the US senate?

[–] SerLava@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Yanis Varoufakis was recently saying some interesting stuff about TikTok. Basically TikTok is a way for a Chinese company to generate data capital in a way that cant be taxed or restricted in ports, and that drives US capital crazy.

He also connected it with the Huawei ban- basically the US is terrified of China's free universal digital banking, because it could threaten to unseat the dollar as the international trade currency.

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don’t think China will allow it to happen. Someone on here once explained why that’s the case but I can’t remember the details

[–] MaoShanDong@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

There are a couple of points to consider the biggest one being that Americans as a user base are but a fraction of the global base,less than 10% iirc, and one of the hardest to monetize. Outside of financial considerations it's worth more to keep tiktok just for the global soft power it exerts on the other parts of the world and to send a message as well.

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

They aren't required to sell it. That's the end of it. It's not for sale.

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still only going to be banned under trump. They extended it to 9-12 months specifically to keep it alive through the election to hurt genojoe

[–] whatup@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Part of me wants the parent company to cut their losses and immediately dissolve TikTok US just to spite Brandon and the tech ghouls.

load more comments
view more: next ›