I use qBittorrent and haven't heard anything bad.
The main one that turned to fuckery is µTorrent, stay far away from that.
edit: lol, they're still around and offering paid services for a torrent client, fuck off.
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
43 points (97.8% liked)
technology
23218 readers
1 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
qbittorrent is the new old-µTorrent, back when it was fast and reliable and THE go-to torrent client.
Or ktorrent if you're on kde/Linux.
Yeah I remember the µTorrent fuckery.
qBitTorrent works fine for me
qBitTorrent on PC. LibreTorrent on Android
Deluge because of plugins and headless server/client GUI feature
Can you expand on what these are/do?
you can run it on a server and then remotely connect to it using a webUI in-browser and torrent stuff onto the server.
If you have Android there's also a thin client you can use to connect. Decent UI and it supports magnet links
qBittorrent has that to, but deluge lets you use the desktop client to connect to the server as well.
Tbh I rarely use the plugins anymore, I just like that I have the option... no longer using RSS feeds but when I was, I had a Deluge plugin set up to auto-dl and organize files based on regex. Maybe this is an option in other mature clients these days, I dunno.
I've got a docker host and a Deluge container. I think it's pretty rad to be able to feed the server daemon a torrent from anywhere on my home net and have it get to work downloading and seeding. Was a bit of work but it's been set-and-forget since.
I like Deluge because it works very well with the seedbox service I'm using.
Do not use Tixati or uTorrent or Bittorrent. these are proprietary software.
Deluge, QBittorrent, rTorrent, and Transmission are all fine options and I think they each excel in different ways. Most seedboxes use Deluge or rTorrent.
I never really like QBittorrent because I don't like the libQT interface. It's probably fine to use.
Deluge is the preferred client by seedboxers who seed new torrents. For torrents that are less than 48 hours old, deluge seeds much more than any other torrent client. Deluge also downloads more aggressively than the other clients. The drawback of Deluge is that it loses performance at around 500 active torrents.
I haven't noticed Transmission being offered by most seedbox companies for use. It is a fine client. In my own experience, it is limited to around 2000 active torrents seeding before it loses performance. I've known people who seed more than 2000 torrents and they run multiple instances of transmission with different torrents seeding in each.
rTorrent is the best in terms of long term seeding. It is the most lightweight out of the clients. I've has up to 6000 torrents active seeding in an rTorrent client. I would guess that it fails somewhere around 10000 active torrents. The web interface will fail long before it reaches this point so you have to figure out how to control it by command line.
Rtorrent if you like it lightweight
I use fragments because I'm using the GNOME desktop and it looks nice.
Deluge on the server and qbittorrent on the laptop. Might move to rtorrent this year.
I alternate between qbittorrent and transmission
I use Deluge because FOSS and python
deluge is nice, i run it on my raspberry pi along with plex so i can torrent stuff from anywhere onto it using the webUI which is really handy. its GUI client is good too for general use, it's lightweight and open source. i was a utorrent 2.2.1 purist for a long time but deluge is what got me to change things up.
yeah last I saw deluge had not been getting a lot of updates but its still my preferred as well
I still use Transmission.
qBittorrent Just Works. I also use transmission sometimes, as it's just the default installed client on some distros.
qButorrent for QT, Transmission for GTK
+1 on qBitTorrent
nyaa . si for anime
Up until recently I had a very, very old version of uTorrent installed, used it till it was unusable, swapped to qBit like last year.
I use qbittorrent running on a server so I can just throw torrents in it and they automatically get added to my jellyfin.
Nobody else has said Tixati is there a reason i shouldn't be using it?
It's not open source and there are open source alternatives that do the same things or more.
It's not very likely at all that you're going to get screwed over by your torrent client, but it is a good idea to use open source, auditable software for something as sensitive as torrenting.
More of a "better safe than sorry" than a "you're actively harming yourself".
Well, I’ve never heard of it until now. I just need things to download, and the other ones mentioned here do that just fine. I can’t imagine what advanced technology Tixati offers that it needs ti be proprietary.
It depends what you want to do with it. Webtorrent-desktop has been my go-to for a while now. It's great for videos as it'll stream mp4 in the client or open mkv in VLC within a few seconds of starting a download.