this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
143 points (93.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I trust Trump about as far as I can throw him, and at the end of the day it's really the Pentagon calling the shots here not the POTUS.

But dudes clearly speaking to a public sentiment here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CommunistBear@hexbear.net 85 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Biden and the Dems are so bloodthirsty that Trump is the nominal antiwar position. I hate this fucking place

[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 65 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Trump is the nominal antiwar position

Trump isn't anti-war, or at least I don't trust him to be actually anti-war. He's anti-this-war, but his administration did plenty of hawkish shit towards Iran and Venezuela. I'm not even confident he'll actually do anything to deescalate in Ukraine, I think it's all bluster.

[–] mar_k@hexbear.net 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

not to mention he ramped up drone strikes 400% more than obama

[–] P1d40n3@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago (3 children)

one of the few things I'm willing to give Biden credit for - he stopped the drone strikes

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

same here. and I have never heard a liberal mention it

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Did he really, or did he just change who's using them?

[–] P1d40n3@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Your counterpoint was valid when the Saudis were bombing Yemen, but ever since that wound down, there are legit less bombings.

Still not voting Biden, but I just believe in giving credit where it's due.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago

Wow. Credit where credit's due. I didn't know this.

Source

[–] Droplet@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

After Soleimani was killed and a war was nearly started with Iran in January 2020, there was still an “oh shit” moment from the Trump government and they quickly walked back and prevented a war from being escalated.

At the very least, you can still argue that Trump was duped by his advisors into thinking that assassinating a “rogue general” can solve the Iran problem.

You cannot look at Ukraine and say that the Biden administration has ever come close to a moment of wanting to “walk back”. For 2.5 years, knowing that 500k people have been killed, they still want to fight it to the last Ukrainian. At every turn there is only escalation - sending more and more weapons to Ukraine, long-range missiles to kill civilians within Russian borders, taking out their anti-ballistic missile warning system, threatening about a nuclear war with Russia. These people are insane.

Not that Trump can change anything at this point. It is far too late. Even if he is president, he cannot stop the war that is already in motion, because too much financial interests from the bourgeoisie are now tied to the Ukraine war at this point.

[–] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Trump's actions are often just attempts to satisfy his ego through positive media and supporter reaction. The issue with Iran if you recall is that his main supporter at the time, Fox news had a mixed reaction, with Tucker Carlson being extremely critical, something obviously like hell freezing over.

You can go and check back on the entire Carlson arc back then but here for example Fox's Tucker Carlson slammed conservatives for pushing Trump to go to war: 'About 20 minutes ago we were denouncing these very people as the deep state'

His base didn't particularly like that idea, he was MAGA and isolationist and yet he was about to put the US into a war with a nobody-country that wasn't a threat at the time. It wasn't Bush post 9/11 even though he thought that was an easy win.

As soon as the base consolidated into the neutral/negative camp which he didn't expect, he backed off. Right now his base is very much positive towards ending "Biden's war" so he is very likely to do it.

But his base also doesn't like China so that will be the next target.

[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

At the very least, you can still argue that Trump was duped by his advisors into thinking that assassinating a “rogue general” can solve the Iran problem.

Thing is, if that's the case he can probably be duped again.

After Soleimani was killed and a war was nearly started with Iran in January 2020, there was still an “oh shit” moment from the Trump government and they quickly walked back and prevented a war from being escalated.

Is that because he's genuinely anti-war or cuz some Brass at the Pentagon thought it wasn't an opportune time to start shit with Iran and told him to cool it?

Really at the end of the day I don't think it matters, the PSL could win this Presidential race and it wouldn't change a thing foreign policy wise (and probably not much domestically either), those aren't decisions any elected leader has any meaningful sway over.

[–] Droplet@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am not saying Trump is anti-war, I am saying that Biden continues to escalate a war for 2.5 years knowing that hundreds of thousands if not millions will be thrown into a meat grinder.

You cannot even attribute that to “we made a mistake, we shouldn’t have started this war” (low bar, but a bar nonetheless), because if so they would have made every attempt to stop it from continuing. Instead, they personally flew to Ukraine and tore up the peace negotiations Ukraine was undergoing with Russia. They really want to fight this to the last Ukrainian. And that’s scary if you think about it.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 11 months ago

In doing so, they've signed the death warrant for their own credibility as an ally.

You aligned with the US/NATO explicitly because they were a big, strong military and economic partner, who could provide deterrence, and if that failed, prevent you from losing the war.

This alliance will deliver Ukraine less-than-zero benefit: they'll still lose the war, but being propped up and egged on means it will take longer, be bloodier and more destructive, and leave them with more debt.

Perhaps the "deterrence" factor was limited because they weren't Core NATO and there was no Article 5 trigger risk. It still suggests there's no value in cozying up to the institution if you can't qualify for full membership, and even then, would they really pull out all the stops for a new member of low value?

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Is that because he's genuinely anti-war or cuz some Brass at the Pentagon thought it wasn't an opportune time to start shit with Iran and told him to cool it?

16 or so ballisic missiles pounded the Al Assad Airforcebase and did "Only Braindamage + some later death" to some 100 soldiers.. while the USA had Nothing to respond ,even just verbally to respond with some stupid" Though talk" at this moment would have forced Iran to preempty flatten all the Other bases they have there (they nervously shoot down a hole airliner, so they where extremly on edge) ... So Imagine there was a collective experiance of "Oh Fuck oh Fuck+ we are Powerless" in the Command center or whatever.. Thats some experiance that produces wisedom ...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kieselguhr@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

same with Orban vs EU

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 69 points 11 months ago

The problem with Trump is not that he can't read the room. On the contrary, that's part of the problem. The room is filled with transphobic, military thumping, chauvinist, xenophobic, treat gobbling bullshit.

[–] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 59 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Gee, why doesn't he feel the same about Palestine? brow

[–] sovietknuckles@hexbear.net 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
  1. us-foreign-policy

  2. Trump knows how to read the room, and ending the war in Ukraine is a rewarding grift. Ending the genocide in Palestine is not nearly as rewarding

[–] Droplet@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because AIPAC lobbying (money laundering) works on both Democrats and Republicans. War in Israel/Palestine is good for both sides of the ruling class.

Ukraine is different. It is strongly tied to the Democratic Party and the Biden family (note Hunter Biden’s involvement) which essentially allows the Biden Democrats to unlock a “cheat code” that blatantly pumps $175 billion (so far) for Ukraine in just 2 years, as long as the majority of the people are sympathetic to the Ukrainian cause, and which are ultimately laundered back to the pockets of Democratic politicians and their proxies, as well as the military industrial complexes, oil and gas industries and financial companies that have pledged their loyalty to the Bidens, as a treat.

This is why Trump and the Republicans want to end the war in Ukraine, and why they are so keen on crucifying Hunter Biden. The Republicans are getting beat at the avenues that give away treats to the bourgeoisie. It is simply more profitable to align with the Democrats and gain access to the Ukraine gravy train.

This is also why the Biden campaign has been propping up Hunter lately - him persuading Joe Biden to keep running, attending White House meetings with Joe, etc. - to signal that even if Joe’s mental ability has far degraded, Hunter’s still there to make sure that the promises of treats to the Biden Patreon supporters will be fulfilled.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago

Our big wet boy is a huge zionist

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 41 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Love when every Republican president for the past fifty years is ideologically to biden's left

edit: they're right, Bush is the only exception (and still to Biden's left on border and immigration policy)

[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 49 points 11 months ago (2 children)

every Republican president for the past fifty years is ideologically to biden's left

Lets not overstate things, mission-accomplished was a fucking monster, probably worse than Trump and Biden.

[–] sir_this_is_a_wendys@hexbear.net 28 points 11 months ago

Oops all genocidal war criminals!

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago

Yeah on second thought, he's def worse than both, probably worse than both combined depending on how you calculate that.

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

come on, don't forget the oil man no-oil

[–] citrussy_capybara@hexbear.net 32 points 11 months ago

Senator Biden supported the Iraq attack 2003 and signed off on bunches of his legislation

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago

I always wonder how instrumental W was to the invasion plan. Not to hand it to him at all, but he always seemed just not interested in being president let alone personally make the invasion a reality.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

Yeah we really memory holed who may genuinely have been the most evil US president of all time, and that's a pretty fucking serious competition

[–] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

Trump was already president and his foreign policy was pretty bad. He threw Rojavah to Turkey and was trying hard to start a war with Iran, assassinated Soleimani, and people just forgot about that when the pandemic started. He tried to coup Venezuela for guaido, remember that pathetic boat thing where they all got caught immediately? Remember the Bolivian coup that Amerikkka was almost certainly involved in?

[–] Black_Mald_Futures@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but see that's comparatively GOOD foreign policy, just a list of failures except for assassinating that guy

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

Biden also has had a ton of failures. Assassinating Soleimani easily could've started a war that would've killed hundreds of thousands, we really don't need to hand it to him.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago

He threw Rojavah to Turkey

To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, to be her ally is fatal

[–] casskaydee@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And yet Biden is still worse

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deinonychus@hexbear.net 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We need an emoji of this with Trump's hair photoshopped on with how often this happens.

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago

A quick and dirty version

[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 33 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Biden and any other POTUS runs US Imperialism by the playbook. Trump will not change US Imperialism, but he does disrupt it and panics the deep state (Industrialists and the MIC), I don't think any other POTUS would've gone to the DPRK

[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

Still paint me skeptical he would really do any meaningful damage.

Whatever I ain't voting for either of them.

[–] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

We have a saying on Vulcan: Only Nixon can go to China, and only Trump can go to the DPRK

load more comments
view more: next ›