this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
537 points (93.1% liked)

Science Memes

15015 readers
1889 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] halendos@lemmy.world 153 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

You sly dawg

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago

Son of a bitch, stole my line

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 116 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It took me up until reading your comment to get this one. "Is it that the scaling transformation only scaled the y-axis?? Oh..."

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I teach these basic transformations as part of my middle school math classes, and I was completely loss as to why they didn't include a reflection, but then I realized a reflection wouldn't be that interesting because it could be indistinguishable from a translation.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I was at a loss too as to where they source the "most common" when skewing is also extremely common

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Scaling, in general, is the least common middle school transformation covered by state curriculum as far as depth of knowledge is concerned, at least where I've taught. Students just aren't ready at that age to calculate something as sophisticated as the scale factor contributing to an object's loss of size.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think the students are ready and quite capable of such sophistication. They're just too distracted with sharing memes.

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I think the students are ready and quite capable of such sophistication. They're just too distracted with sharing memes.

(Oh, I know, my middle schoolers do alright as long as our figures are two-dimensional, and my high school geometry students do very well; I just wanted to say the magic, fun, wink wink word again. 🙂)

[–] like@sh.itjust.works 71 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't use this. It's not a lossless transformation!

[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Meanwhile, in SVG: <g filter="scale: 0.5"><xlink:use … /></g>

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 57 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Goddammit. This is like getting rickrolled.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 25 points 10 months ago

We rarely get rickrolled anymore, such a loss

[–] GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

> Goddamnit.
> This is
> like getting
> rick[rolling something involves flattening it]

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 35 points 10 months ago

Is this science?

...seriously, I'm at a loss

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The second is not really scaled, and the second and forth have translation. Usually that wouldn't be a problem for demonstrative proposed, if translation wouldn't be shown explicitly. Can be fixed by introducing a canvas of the before/after picture

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 months ago

The second is scaled in one axis, and had translation otherwise it would be hard to understand. And the rotation can be achieved by moving the origin of rotation.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 23 points 10 months ago
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok ... I didn't know this meme (too old and/or out of the loop I suppose) ... so out of annoyance I looked it up ...

... and yea ... as far as trolling is concerned gotta pay the game here ... not sure it was worth 15 mins of my life but ... kudos I guess

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago
[–] apocalypticat@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Scaling looks like scaling+translation? And rotation looks like either rotation+translation, or scaling+translation?

[–] Soulfulginger@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] apocalypticat@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Oooh🤦‍♂️

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 58 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What is “loss” in this context?

[–] flyingchaucer@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Know Your Meme's page on Loss.

Basically, a 2000s webcomic about gamer culture devoted a comic (titled Loss) to the writer's partner who had a miscarriage. It's four wordless panels, and the characters in each panel take up roughly the positions of the rectangles in the OP.

Tonally, it was the complete opposite of what the webcomic normally covered, and it really shocked its readers who, being an internet community, responded with irony and parody, and now there are a ton of Loss references out there.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago
[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Only the transformations one is correct. All the other ones seemingly also preform a translation, and even if they might be correct if you take the orgin to be slightly outside of the shape but that's bad for educational purposes. Also this one makes the translation transformation look like the identity transformation.

This last one might just be me, but shouldn't shearing be included here?

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Could you explain it then?

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It’s a “loss” meme.

[–] GlennMagusHarvey@mander.xyz 9 points 10 months ago

Um

The second wrong.

Or...only one

Dimension

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No shear is disappointing.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Yeah, such a big loss it wasn't included.

[–] funbreaker@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 months ago

I had to look at this twice to get it. I must be losing my touch.

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago