this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
57 points (98.3% liked)

New York Times gift articles

1258 readers
76 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is it someone's turn again already?

[–] jonne 13 points 5 months ago

They probably have some guys that only have a few months left to live waiting in the wings who will really stick it to Trump.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 22 points 5 months ago

"The DNC chooses Hillary Clinton to head the DNC and Biden will be her Vice Chair. Look we have a woman! Vote please."

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Anyone who was surprised raise your hand.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Progressives have the numbers, I think, so perhaps it's time for a progressive party. Faith in dems has never been lower.

We don't need to convince the old guard. If we can get center members of the party to split off (folks like Buttigeg and Walz) and convince a good chunk of the non-voters to show up, I think it would be doable to supplant the Dems entirely.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We don't actually have the numbers to win. Something like 1/3 of people who vote for Democrats are probably progressives.

What's missing is the the kind of media machine the Republicans have. Without that, any kind of left-of-center message just gets overwhelmed by lies about it.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Something like 1/3 of people who vote for Democrats are probably progressives.

But how many more potential progressives don't vote at all?

There are a lot of people who feel like the government is just going to screw them over no matter who is elected (which is true!) They may not be familiar with the language of academic socialism, but if you start saying it in plain English I think they'll be pretty much on board.

Fighting corruption, making the rich pay their fair share, free healthcare, and fuck landlords are all pretty popular ideas

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago

I agree, but the first and biggest hurdle to that is convincing progressives to stop burying their heads in the sand. That's... uh... good luck, but I'm not hopeful.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It won't matter they will get the results they want to get.

And have no faith in the Democratic party anymore.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Cornell West said it best recently, the Democratic Party is beyond redemption.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago

The Party of Complicity does not like progressives

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Voting for the Duopoly will not end the Duopoly

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They were remarkably close to keeping him without an additional election.

An initial resolution from Christine Pelosi, the daughter of former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, seeking to dismiss the complaint resulted in a tie vote.

Doesn't take much change pushed up from the bottom to change where they're at.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Only if he consented to ending his campaign to primary out establish centrists with progressive candidates.

That's not them being magnanimous, that was an ultimatum.