this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
999 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

73370 readers
4447 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is a combination of terrible legislation in the UK meets awful social media site.

The Online Safety Act is an abomination, compromising the privacy and freedom of the vast majority of the UK in the name of "protecting children".

I'm of the view parents are responsible for protecting their children. I know it's hard but the Online Safety Act is not a solution.

All it will.do is compromise the privacy and security of law abiding adults while kids will still access porn and all the other really bad stuff on the Internet will actually be unaffected. The dark illegal shit on the Internet is not happening on Pornhub or Reddit.

The UK is gradually sliding further and further into censorship, and authoritarianism and all the in the name of do gooders. It's scary to watch.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 58 points 1 week ago

The online safety act isn't actually about protecting children. That's a smoke screen for a surveillance bill. They want to eliminate anonymity online.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 47 points 1 week ago (18 children)

The solution to all of this “think of the children” stuff is that devices owned/used by children should have to be registered as a child’s device, which would enable certain content blockers.

Forcing adults to verify their identity, rather than simply activating some broad based restrictions on devices being purchased for child use, is a waste of time. Kids will still find workarounds. Adult privacy will be compromised.

Its also an easily enforceable policy to require registration of children’s devices. You can hold the parents to compliance. You can hold the carriers to compliance. Its truly the simplest way to keep kids from accessing porn without having to mess with adult use of the internet whatsoever

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ageek@lemmy.world 101 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Next in the news: "500k Usernames, Passwords and biometric data leaked in the latest hack"

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago

So...coming soon: an app that can match up images of friends or colleagues with a summary of their pornography preferences.

This could at least liven up some boring meetings or dull parties...

load more comments (2 replies)

Yeah, I will definitely trust an internet stranger with my face so they can verify that I'm not underage to access content which could, in case of being leaked, damage my reputation or even destroy my life.

DEFINITELY

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah, fuck all that.

Guess we're transitioning into a VPN only future.

We have the opportunity to head into a utopic or dystopic future and we're absolutely choosing the dystopic one.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (6 children)

They'll criminalize personal VPN users for non-work purposes, next.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A VPN future? Haha. Not if they don't want to. There are many ways to prevent VPN from operating when you're a government.

You can just plain ban encryption, which sounds really crazy, but yeah, they're trying to.

You can just say "it's illegal to use a VPN". It'll technically still work, but if there's a trace of trafic from your house to a known VPN endpoint, you're it! Great!

They can force custom proprietary spying software on your devices. Sounds equally crazy as the thing above, right? But rest assured they're ALSO trying to do that. Multiple times, even. And in some places… they did. Of course, nothing forces you to have such software on your device. Especially if your devices are not supported; it also turns into a "you have to buy this or that big name device, everything else's de-facto illegal! Fuck you, we're the government!". And if you get caught for whatever, and your phone, PC, or anything isn't "compliant"? Bam. Guilty.

Plenty of option. All of them completely stupid and would weaken both privacy, individuals, and governments at large. It never stopped legislation from being pushed forward.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They can force custom proprietary spying software on your devices.

  • That would block Linux from their borders, which means goodbye Steam Deck in the UK among other things.
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, and? We're not talking logic and rational decisions here, unfortunately.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, I guess i am going to be regularly updating the metadata on my most recent selfie.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Oh dear. What a dreadful business.

Anyway, this is mine.

[–] bnrnrtbgd@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If the UK is going to require adult verification it should be built into your internet contract. Yeah, I'm an adult. I'm paying my bills, of course I'm a fucking adult. I over pay for this garbage internet.

Uploading a selfie? The ai is going to determine if you're over 18? Can the ai determine if the selfie is also ai?

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's some serious BS. They are forcing you to hand over and trust Reddit with your personal information, yet I wouldn't trust them if my life depended on it.

At the very least, someone in charge of this legisltion should learn OAuth2 and force the sites they want to comply by only let those OAuth2 accounts access their adult content. If I was in the UK, I'd just pay for a VPN over giving my photo to Reddit. That site is a lobby brigade hellhole whose "we know your dark secrets, we know everything" owner is also probably trading your account details on the side.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjmoldy@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (8 children)

POV: You're the intern tasked with reviewing the selfies.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Outwit1294@lemmy.today 53 points 1 week ago

This whole thing is a security disaster waiting to happen.

[–] jhoward@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 1 week ago (8 children)

What's to stop uploading a random picture of a person? Or even an AI generated person? I get what they're trying to do, but seems like legislative theater more than anything.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I've once attempted to open a bank account where they wanted video proof, and expected me to say a randomly assigned phrase, to solve the issue you mention.

I didn't do it. Fucking KYC is BS.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Banks are highly regulated so it is not surprising that they would be strict in this, reddit on the other hand has no business doing it.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

has no business doing it.

Reddit is doing this as a response to regulation as well (1). Governments all around europe (2) are turning communications into a highly regulated environment ("for the children"), because they're afraid of people communicating and having thoughts. UK is just one of the early adaptors.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

u/spez was the lead moderator of r/jailbait, and when he was caught, he got rid of mod transparency. Ghilisaine Maxwell was likely a l lead moderator of news Reddits as well (u/MaxwellHill). Reddit has always been compromised.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

To follow compliance with the Know Your Customer Pornographic Materials Act, please use the following guidelines for your photograph:

  1. The picture must be clear, at least 720x480p.

  2. The picture must include your entire body, including your head and toes. Portrait only. *This helps us identify you better.

  3. Please remove any articles of clothing, your body must be unimpeded by any obstruction. *Burqas and other headscarves must be removed, no exceptions.

  4. If you were assigned female at birth, you will be required to rotate 180 degrees and upload another portrait photograph of your back. *Please use only your valid binary gender at birth, either male or female.

  5. Further requests for identification photos are at our discretion, our board has full authority. You may be required to upload alternative photos, such as positions bending over to help us identify your genitalia to ensure it matches your birth gender.

Thank you for using Persona. For any questions or complaints, please direct them to: BigDaddyGuns6969@aol.com. Please allow up to 14 days for an initial response, and 88 hours for subsequent replies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Meh, just upload a dick pic.

Greedy little pigboy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lmao when the "anonymous" online forum requires de-anonymizing, I want to hope everyone leaves

load more comments (3 replies)

I'm a UK citizen, fuck everything about this law. I'm so sick of the current authoritarian trend amongst some western countries. The UK is one of the worst offenders.

It's not even about protecting kids. It's about control and appeasing puritanical elements in society. We're the 6th richest economy in the world and we can't even offer some of the poorest kids food security. But at least they can't see a pair of tits on Reddit.

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They better be NSFW selfies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cliff@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Just upload a picture of any politician who voted for this.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Kier Starmer voice: “We are an island, of wankers”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IllNess 29 points 1 week ago (9 children)

There's a bunch of AI face generating pictures. I wonder if you can just use those. Or maybe this is just to create a new law to arrest people of uploading fake pictures...

https://thispersonnotexist.org/

https://this-person-does-not-exist.com/en

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Keeping the age verifier seperate from the content host is good. Destroying the files used for verification is good. On paper it's not too a bad system for age verification, but it really hinges on if you can trust them. Given the track record of basically almost every company and government ever...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] berno@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Fuck Reddit fuck spez

[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's see how much VPN subscription count will go up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We thought the same thing about Netflix with the sharing password bans. Yet they retained more profit than ever the next year.

Who's to say if this is what will make Reddit end, or did they actually just got more successful after the end of 3rd party apps compared to the declaration of so many users back then?

Digital personal verification is just going to become a fact of life in the future for everyone born after about 2012. They will use online ID cards, biometrics, location metadata that is constantly uploaded by our devices, maybe even implanted RFID encrypted chips for account verification. Passwords are becoming outdated and outmoded for security as we speak here. 2FA is the minimum security for online today but that may soon become outmoded as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago
[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Hm, I'm going to need some software engineers to critique an idea I have that could at least partially solve the fears people have about their personal details being tied to their porn habits.

The system will be called the Adult Content Verification System (or Wank Card if you want to be funny). It's a physical card, printed by the government with a unique key printed on it. Those cards are then sold by any shop that has an alcohol license (premises or personal). You go in, show your ID to the clerk, buy the card. That card is proof that you're over 18, but it is not directly tied to you, you just have to be over 18 to buy it. The punishment for selling a Wank Card to someone under the age of 18 is the same as if you sold alcohol to someone under 18.

When you go to the porn site, they check if you're from the UK, they check if you have a key associated with your account. If not, they ask for one, you provide the key to the site, the site does an API call to https://wankcard.gov.uk/api/verify with the site's API key (freely generated, but you could even make the api public if you want) and the key on the card, gets a response saying "Yep! This is a valid key!" and hey presto, free to wank and nobody knows it's you! If you don't have an account, the verification would have to be tied to a cookie or something that disappears after a while for all you anonymous people.

As a result, you can both prove that you're over 18 (because you have the card) and some company over in San Francisco doesn't get your personal data, because you never actually record it anywhere. All you have is keys, and while yes, the government could record "Oh this key was used to verify on this site", they'd have to know which shop the key was bought from, who sold it, and who bought it, which is a lot more difficult to do unless the shopkeeper keeps records of everyone he's ever sold to.

So... Good idea? Bad idea? Better than the current approach anyway, I think.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sending a dick pick. Now it's whatever is in front of these to make a though decision.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is the facebook "show a video of your face" bs all over again. glad i don't have an account on either site bc not only is it a huge privacy concern, you know they store all that data and are going to sell it and/or use it to train AI models

load more comments
view more: next ›