this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
105 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

9809 readers
592 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive: [ https://archive.is/VkJDP ]

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Or you could just stop subsidizing them and save about 4.8 billion a year. Why do we have to add more middlemen to document and collect taxes?

[–] Eczpurt@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A lot of people don't understand just how well the oil and gas industry is treated here. The subsidies are just the tip of the iceberg. If we could see everything that they get away with, I'm sure we'd be upset to say the least.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Exactly. The poorer their behavior, the more toys get taken away.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah. We signed the Paris agreement and we were supposed to take steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Our oil companies are the largest producers of these gasses and we were supposed to reduce production. And what did we do instead? We fucking subsidized more development projects in these industries.

We should fucking sue the government, and especially the Trudeau administration for not holding up their promises in accordance with the Paris accord agreement. That shit was signed in 2015 or 2016. We should have done something by now and nothing was done.

They even fucking promised to plant millions of trees and they planted like, what... 3? And stopped there.

They talk the talk but can't walk the walk. We were duped.

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Going over the list of subsidies the oil and gas sector receive, most of them are received on the basis of developing cleaner sources of energy.

If we are going to do something, taxing the windfall rather than giving up programs that are intended to help the environment means even if you end up giving the money straight back to them through those programs, they are earmarked to a specific goal that is to the benefit of the people and not left to their own discretion.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The same sources of cleaner energy that the oil companies have given up on and lied about?

No, they're talking about Carbon Capture. Which is a new source of clean energy the oil companies are lying about.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why not take the money given to oil companies as R&D grants, and turn it into university R&D grants?

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Don't leave us hanging. Why not?

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Dunno, I would guess because oil companies donate more to political parties than grad students?

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago

Honestly I don't care about this. I'd rather we just stop subsidising them and then slap them with a proper carbon tax. If they still manage to make a profit under those conditions, then we can talk.

[–] Crankpork@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

If they're making record profits, why do they need so many subsidies?

[–] NotAPenguin@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

They should be taxed regardless of profits....

CO2 tax please.

[–] Hello_there@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago
[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure, but you know they’ll just raise the prices we pay to make up for it.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Here's the weird thing: if they raise prices and we savagely tax all profits above a certain amount, it ultimately benefits EV people to a massive extent.

Even as a petrol car family, I'm hugely in favour of that plan.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

EVs are a stop gap measure. We need better public transit infrastructure and better railways.

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We had a great public transit system when most people lived rurally, but that age is behind us. Most people live in urban areas now. Urban areas don't need transit. You can walk everywhere. That's the whole reason cities were created.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Seems like all industries are experiencing record profits, while hard working folks are experiencing record debt.

There's no way the two are connected. /s 🙄

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Should have started this 20 years ago.