this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
57 points (83.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43824 readers
858 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I see all the memes about guillotines for the rich, funny in spirit, but actually building one in the town square is not practical. They take a ton of materials, they are huge, and they do not even work reliably. Would it not make more sense to build one from metal with hydraulic pistons or something? I am not a machinist, but a more mobile unit you could wheel into a square to decapitate a few effigies seems about as effective for sending a message, and easier to remove or relocate if needed.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Same reason people have crosses on them. It's a symbol.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 17 points 20 hours ago

Ton of materials?

It's just a large frame to hold a big knife dropped by letting go of a rope. The hardest thing to get would be the blade, and the whole thing could be constructed in under 2 hours.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Guillotines are too tame for modern audiences. Wood chippers are fresh and exciting.

[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Ohhh that's great!

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 day ago (36 children)

If it's about sending a message, then the item itself is the conveyor of the message, not an unrecognizable but more efficient substitute. The guillotine is a recognisable symbol of people rising up and seizing power from the criminal ruling class. It is a warning and a threat.

If you plan on actually executing people, then sure - optimize all you want, or just go with a bullet to the brain.

But as a symbol, the guillotine is powerful.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 6 points 18 hours ago

I like your approach here of making a clearly wrong statement just to get more activity on this important topic

I will add yet another comment that guillotines are neither complicated nor require much material. you could make a sturdy one with less than a dozen 2x4s, some screws, a scrap piece of rope, and whatever junk metal you have lying around that's around 24x8 (which you need regardless of how fancy the frame itself is)

that said, mobile ones seem like they would also have a purpose

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ugh? Guillotines are very reliable actually. And it's not that expensive, everything is wood except the large blade. Also, you can't fake an execution, the crowd will be satisfied when they see the head

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

not that expensive, everything is wood

Oh how times have changed

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 22 hours ago

Don't fix what's not broken

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

Who is joking?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can make them modular, with telescoping rails, for portability. The blade needs to be weighted, but the weight can consist of a stack of weights, like on gym equipment. In fact, you could probably repurpose a bench press machine into a guillotine with a few minor modifications.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You can also add jets to make it shoot down faster.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I love where your head is at! 🤣

[–] Gumus@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 5 points 22 hours ago

It's called a Smith Machine.

Really smooth action.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, some people don't. Assuming op isn't trolling, one of my kids is like this.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

Same reason we still "hang up" the phone.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

Because if we talk about guns and bombs we end up on a list.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

if it were up to me, i would use a chainsaw

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Are you the type that loves bathing in gore? Because that's what will happen immediately if you start chainsawing people up. They throw everything directly back at the user.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

shit, man. fuck

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 20 hours ago

Treat it like a Gallagher show and give the first 3 rows rain ponchos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Use a log splitter with a different blade, higher capacity valance and an accumulator for faster action. Strengthen the frame and maybe add a dampener for the end of stroke so things last longer. Reloading ca be controlled by smaller hoses.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Don't log splitters work incredibly slow?

That's not really gonna chop people's heads off, rather it would inexorably pinch their necks until their head falls off.

That's pretty fucking gruesome.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago

Most wood splinters do move slow but that one (Large valve and accumulator) would make it faster.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›