Poor people buy Campbell's? That shit is pricey as hell nowadays and I can't remember the last time I gave a fuck about their overpriced oversalted garbage.
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
286 points (99.0% liked)
Not The Onion
18690 readers
1280 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Jokes on them, their soups are not cheap anymore.
Everyone should avoid that shit anyway. There are healthier and less expensive soups out there, Make your own!!!
This administration will excuse it the order will come down from the Supreme Court and Pam bondi to excuse the racist behavior.
Ah...the Adobe business model. Make your customers hate your company and product. Bold move.
I call it: "Fuck you, buy our stuff."
What was said, from the article:
Local 4 News in Detroit broadcast portions of the recording. In it, a speaker identified as Bally is heard saying, "We have s**t for f***king poor people. Who buys our s**t? I don’t buy Campbell’s products barely anymore. It’s not healthy now that I know what the f**‘s in it."
He also referenced "bioengineered meat," saying, "I don’t wanna eat a piece of chicken that came from a 3D printer."
The recording, which lasted longer than an hour and 15 minutes, included what Garza said was a "disgusting" rant alleged to be made by Bally about his coworkers: "F***ing Indians don’t know a f***ing thing," and "Like they couldn’t think for their f***ing selves," it said in part.
The bioengineered meat bit is honestly hilarious to me, it's clear this guy has no relation to actual production. 3D printed meat is nowhere near viable for the scale of production that Campbells operates at- it can't keep up with the sheer volume required and it is significantly more expensive than traditional meat production.
Dude's just gone off the deep end with right-wing conspiracy theories, which makes sense given the whole racist tirade and hating the poor.
Wait till these people learn about chicken nuggets.
Tell me more? A nugget of chicken, you say...?
We already had that idiotic "pink slime" scare several years ago. No need to rehash that nonsense.
Its sounds more like a tongue-in-cheek comment to me.
The craziest thing to me about this is that the employee (who was very smart to record this conversation) literally used official internal channels to report this. Rather than deal with it professionally, they fired him for being honest.
Well, I guess it’s time to leak to the press, then…
Also, from those remarks, it really seems like the VP hates his job. They should’ve done him and the company a favor and fired him instead.
The companies Facebook is getting wrecked by the “MAHA” crowd, which is pretty hilarious. They are not happy about the bio-engineered meat.
Yeah, I bet those foreign influencers are really pissed.
That's so much worse than the title suggested.
"Who buys our s**t? I don’t buy Campbell’s products barely anymore. It’s not healthy now that I know what the f**‘s in it."
Maybe, I dunno, make it more healthful?
(English pedant peeve: food is not “healthy” or unhealthy; it’s healthful or unhealthful. Living things are healthy, nutrients are healthful. A state of health versus a beneficial quality.)
Better option: don't be poor.
I'm feeling very gasful today.
Technically correct, but actual usage has made "healthy" synonymous with "healthful" as well as far more commonly used. The distinction was pretty useless, anyway. A "who/whom" situation.
Obligatory “technically correct, the best kind of correct”
That’s how English works. It’s usage. I think the French have a council that decides but English moves a lot faster.
I get having a pet peeve. I for one hate that ignorant means uneducated when it should be someone who is willfully ignoring. That’s just not the way it played out.
I love dictionaries and word usage. “Healthful” is a clunky word, I’m not surprised we moved to “healthy “
Edit: I just realized “helpful” sounds just fine. But if someone said to me “thanks for being so helpy today” I would be a full of seething hatred lol
"Healthy" has always been an actual word, while "helpy" hasn't, so no wonder it's grating!
I'm all for language changing when it makes sense. I can't think of any situation where using "healthy" instead of "healthful" obfuscates the meaning in any way. Same with "who" and "whom." "Whom" and "healthful" could disappear and nothing of value would be lost. But when it comes to things like "literally" meaning "figuratively," I mourn the loss of utility the word used to have.
Oh and it literally worries me when people use one word to mean the exact opposite. That isn’t advancement it’s degradation.
And ten points to grifendor for the word “obfuscate “ it’s one of my favorites.
Sorry for the tripple reply. This is one of the things I get excited about.
Omg I just realized my money concept also applies to sex.
“My wife and I were slapping the banker last night, she got to keep the change”
Knock knock
Who’s there
To
To who?
It’s to whom actually.
Yes as long as what you’re saying makes sense that’s all that matters. Language is just the sound you make to communicate the idea in your head to someone else.
The opposite tho is names. I’m Michael. Not Mike. It doesn’t offended me to be called Mike but that’s not the sound your face needs to make to get my attention. It’s a different sound.
But for just talking… “I stop speak right but you can hold it, then where’s the rub?”
I actually would play around by calling “money” different things. See how weird I could get. “Bucks” fine. Doodlyfranks? In context it works just fine. You can call money anything. Since fallout I regularly say “I’m short on caps” no one’s ever questioned it.
Excellent example of how names work. It’s not about if I’m annoyed or not. If you want to get my attention you have to flap your meat together and blow air thru it this way (the meat people story if you haven’t heard that. It’s great)
I reply with classical works of the philosopher Monty python
“Is you wife a goer, know what I mean, I bet she does I bet she does”
Language has always fascinated me. Clown too. Not party but the ones who don’t talk but communicate ideas thru body language and face make up. Yes the makeup serves a practical communicative purpose.
Poor people can’t afford canned soup, not since covid. Campbells was was 2/$1, $.79 at most. Now it’s $2. Progresso was 3/$5, maybe $1.50 per. Now it’s $2.79 each.
Crockpot or instapot and a freezer is the way, now.
Yup. Crockpot with beans, rice, lentils, chopped veggies, a few bouillon cubes, spices, and whatever meat the grocery store has on clearance. The entire thing will average out to like $1 per bowl, and a big crockpot will keep a couple fed (lunch and dinner) for several days.
a few bouillon cubes
saaaaaalty
I guess Instant Pot really fucked up by not calling their product "Instapot," huh?
I always thought that's what it was, then I googled "instapot" and found it's not actually a thing. TIL!
...I'm still gonna call it that, though.
I hate you
Blame English for being unpleasant to say "nt" followed by a "p" sound.
Or pretty much any consonant, hence instacart?
Sometimes I feel like I'm the only person who likes making weird sounds with their mouth
The title of the article is some serious clickbait. I suggest that you go read the article for yourself or you'll seriously get the wrong idea.
First, the article is basically not about the VP mocking poor people, but about a lawsuit. A person recorded the VP's remarks, which allegedly included racist statements against Indian people. He reported the meeting to management, and then he was fired. The article is about a lawsuit for his being fired for reporting racially discriminatory conduct.
(The guy said he recorded the conversation because he thought the meeting would be about his salary, and wanted to get the comments on record, so even if that's true, it sounds like he knew the VP was a piece of shit who couldn't be trusted.)
Second, the VP was in IT, and was not involved in the production or sales of food. He had the title of Chief Information Security Officer.
In a big company, VPs don't actually hold that important of a role in the first place. It sounds like this VP was a serious asshole. Probably the VP's manager is similarly a seriously incompetent asshole who deserves to be fired, but anybody who has worked in a big company knows these types of guys are a dime a dozen. They weasel their ways in to middle and upper-middle management and it is not rare for them to be completely incompetent and constantly shit on the company and product in private. They often form a sort of asshole clique and make entire sections of a company hellish to work in.
The things these rich pieces of fucking trash deserve is a list based on brutality and rage
Jokes on him, I can only afford ramen