this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
185 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26520 readers
1982 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tomatolung@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

My favorite is the ending:

The Catholic Church is more than 2,000 years old. Declaring war on it is hardly civilized or politically smart. Trump has three years left in office. The Catholic Church will survive condemnation by those in power; it’s hardly the first time this has occurred in its long and storied history. 

Also good:

Clergy members from various denominations have come to detention centers only to be turned away or arrested, wrestled to the ground or sprayed with pepper balls.  

The Coalition for Spiritual and Public Leadership is suing the Trump administration for denying Catholic priests and ministers admission to its ICE facilities. The coalition’s executive director said, “For Catholics, pastoral care isn’t optional. We believe that it’s a lifeline.” 

The response from Trump loyalists is to declare war on the Catholic Church.

 “Boarder czar” Tom Homan condemned the bishops’ letter and the church as “wrong.”“I’m saying it as not only border czar, I’ll say it as a Catholic. I think they need to spend time fixing the Catholic Church, in my opinion.” 

Thou doth protest to much Tom.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That will be the nail in the coffin for any Latino voters who haven’t quit on him already.

Religion is like one of the main reason many vote red.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

That, and the Supreme Court.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As an ex catholic, this sort of thing is part of why it's so hard to fully separate myself from them. They've done so much evil, but right now they're doing exactly the good I was scared they may not.

Just waiting for Vance to be excommunicated.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Peter Thiel calling the pope the “anti-Christ” made me think the pope is pretty fucking cool. It also makes Peter Thiel look like a clown.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The dude is gay and still in the closet even though he’s a billionaire. What is he afraid of?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago

Being honest with himself.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

The guy was so butthurt about it that he had Gawker taken down.

That already shows he is really quite the freak, but the fact that he's so hopped up by the likes of Curtis Yarvin and the nonsense in The Sovereign Individual is next-level-craziness.

And then, on top of that, you add in his weird obsession with xtian eschatology, and it's truly a real WTAF.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well..... The problem is that the Catholic Church does not act as a unified body, especially in America.

Trad Catholics in America have been hating the pope since basically Vatican II. That doesn't mean that "they are at war with the church", just that organizations like Opus Dei are actively trying to pull the church further to the right.

So while some of the church maybe doing good, the other part of the church is ending abortion rights and partaking in other crazy shit on the supreme court.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

Americans taking religion to the extreme so much they don't even seem Christian anymore .

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

MAGA never really liked Catholics anyway. They only liked their votes, because these same bishops have turned many US Catholics into single-issue voters on Abortion, which directly enabled the current Federal assault on these immigrant parishioners. Most of MAGA is Protestant and Evangelical, and sees Catholicism as only a step or two removed from a cult.

And you know how the article references that this is the first "special statement" that the bishops released in 12 years? I looked it up, that statement 12 years ago was railing against the HHS mandate to fund contraception, in the name of "religious freedom".

It is tragic what is happening to their parishioners right now, but the bishops can only blame themselves. They directly advocated for politicians who are now actively targeting their people.

[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

The US has never really been friendly to Catholics as a whole. Jfk was the first Catholic president, and a fear at the time was that the pope would have undue influence. The KKK also went after non-protestants.

[–] jof@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. It's a shame people don't understand that. Actually conservative viewpoints have been long gone from politics. I believe it was Michael Malice who said it--"conservatism is just progressivism driving the speed limit".

Conservatism today is a complete misnomer and just shilling for the traditional religious folk. MAGA does nothing but play on those heart strings and they're still able to lull in so many religious citizens.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I tend to think of and describe myself as a conservative, but don't align myself with the Republican party at all (I am registered to vote Republican to try to weed out the worst of their lunatics in the primaries, but it's gonna be a cold day in hell before I vote for one in a general election with the way things are going)

In my view, which absolutely isn't the view of the Republicans or conservatives as a whole, the point of conservatism is to just pump the breaks and slow things down to make sure all the "I"s are dotted and "t"s crossed to make sure things are actually going to work as intended.

Liberals/leftists/progressives should basically be the "idea guys" coming up with big general plans for what they want to happen

Then the conservatives would be sort of the bean-counters/logistics/nuts-and-bolts sort of guys. They shouldn't be there to outright oppose the liberal ideas, they're there to point out the problems with their plans and make sure they're addressed before we commit to some half-assed plan.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It has never been that way. It might be what you think but not what the majority think.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Yeah I'm pretty sure I said as much dude.

[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is tragic what is happening to their parishioners right now, but the bishops can only blame themselves. They directly advocated for politicians who are now actively targeting their people.

Tell me you don’t understand Catholicism without telling me you don’t understand Catholicism. If there is any Christian church that doesn’t advocate for specific politicians it’s the Catholic Church.

The special message from the U.S. bishops has no call to action outside of calling for care, well treatment and prayer for immigrants in the U.S.

Special Message

I can tell you exactly how this special message will impact church going American Catholics. The Sunday mass following the message will include in its Prayer Intentions something like “we join the call of the U.S. bishops to recognize the humanity in all people, regardless of immigration status. We pray to the Lord”, and the parishioners will reply whether listening or not “Lord hear our prayer.”

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If there is any Christian church that doesn’t advocate for specific politicians it’s the Catholic Church.

Really? They have no problem publicly disciplining specific Catholic politicians over their votes

[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

I really like the sources you provided:

NPR:

After debate last year about whether Communion should be denied to Catholics who support abortion rights, including politicians, U.S. bishops decided not to implement such a policy and instead urged Catholics veering from church teachings to refrain from taking Communion

Wikipedia

In 2008, a minority of American bishops supported denying communion to pro-abortion rights Catholic legislators … These statements of intent from church authorities have sometimes led American Catholic voters to vote for candidates who wish to ban abortion… While there was thus disagreement among the bishops about the opportuneness of refusing the Eucharist to Catholic politicians promoting legalization of abortion, there was unanimity regarding the moral obligation of Catholic politicians who participate in what their Church considers a seriously sinful action to refrain from going to Communion

My takeaway is some Catholics may have been influenced by the opinion of individual bishops, but the church has been quick and consistent in its messaging that in regard to abortion and communion their request is: if you had an abortion, please don’t take communion if you haven’t confessed and asked for forgiveness. (This is the same request they’d ask for what they’d consider any mortal sin.)

It certainly doesn’t seem to suggest the Church is advocating for specific politicians, like my comment you originally replied to mentions.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It is tragic what is happening to their parishioners right now, but the bishops can only blame themselves.

No shortage of liberal bishops who promoted like-minded candidates. Everyone from John Kerry to Joe Biden got a healthy windfall of support from the Catholic community at-large. As a consequence, Dems have historically been very squirrely on their support/opposition to abortion, with "Pro-Life" Democrats being a significant chunk of the elected bureaucracy.

The biggest opposition to ACA in the first two years was from these very Democrats - folks who twisted and squirmed at the prospect of extending the wrong kind of health care to the wrong kind of people. This wasn't a "Catholics brought this on themselves by electing Republicans", it was "Democrats allowed misogyny to fester within its party under the cover of the Catholic vote".

In the same way, Democrats have historically demonstrated a chronic unkindness to migrants and their families whenever they saw an electoral advantage in kicking people while they were down. This dates back to the Clinton Era of the 90s, when Bill ran to the right of Bush Sr on immigration and won California on the anti-Mexico vote. Catholics who were staunchly pro-immigration ran around backing migrant-friendly(ish) Republicans like Bush, Rubio, Romney, and Kasich only to get their backsides blown out by Trumpism.

[–] Threeskittiesinatrenchcoat@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Christian nationalism always turns into a purity contest. I feel like this would be true with any religious based political movement, but my knowledge of these structures in other parts of world is limited.

It always seems to start with purging outsiders, but once the outsiders are not soliciting the right reactions anymore they need to turn inward, they need start eating their own. They need an enemy to point to, they need to convince their followers that they are victims, and that they need to take extraordinary actions in order to take revenge on this perceived enemy.

That collective "enemy" is one of the core principles that unites these scattered political groups, and keeps them working together. Because MAGA isn't just one group, it's a collective of right wing groups united under the banner of defeating the "enemy of the nation" which they've been convinced is this imaginary idea of the left. A group apparently so powerful its influence touches every scientific institution, regulatory body, school and university in the US, but also completely helpless to pass any government policy that might benefit the working class.

Their labeling trans identity an ideology, will go down into the history books along with Geocentrism and Darwinism. As just another example of scientific method coming under attack for going against church doctrine.

[–] Typhoonigator@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You mean heliocentrism, right? Or am I bungling the context here

[–] Threeskittiesinatrenchcoat@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Heliocentrism was the one that replaced geocentrism, but geocentrism was the one championed by the Church at the time.

That said Darwinism should probably be creationism. I screwed up.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Has to be. Otherwise, they are equating geocentrism with darwinism. That is a spicy take which would take some further explanation.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'd love to see the "religious right" wake up a bit to what being "conservative" has actually come to mean. The current level of cognitive dissonance has been a long time in the making.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm a little tired of pretending people just don't understand what is going on. Conservatives are fucking liars. They lie about their beliefs. They lie about their understanding. They feign ignorance at the horror and buy into nakedly fake conspiracy theories and artificially generated images/videos. To quote Upton Sinclair

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

The common denominator across the conservative movement is industry of employment. O&G, FinTech, Sales, Real Estate, Automotive, MLMs... If you find a staunch conservative pundit, you're going to quickly discover one or more of the above puffing up their financial sails.

Religious Right figures know full well that their religious leadership differs from their political leadership and they don't care. Their dioceses are funded with the money from extractive and exploitative industries. Their churches are built with blood money. And they're going to defend that money far more zealously than they defend some random asshole from Chicago promoted to the highest office via a conclave of foreign fucks most of them couldn't pick out of a crowd in full uniform.

The current level of cognitive dissonance has been a long time in the making.

It isn't dissonance. Its a pronounced divorce between the local churches and Rome that's been widening since Vatican II. As Catholicism spreads across the developing world and shrivels in the imperial core, the so-called Catholics find their economic future and their religious faith at odds. And they aren't flinching in response. They're going all in on the money.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think there is a bit of cultural narcissism underpinning it all. It's the mindset that they are the special ones chosen for preferred treatment by the omnipotent ruler of the universe. No matter the issue, we're the good ones and the other guy is bad, and leopards won't eat our faces. It's only when the cruel grifters they've voted into power casually do something that directly harms them do they begin to wonder if something might be wrong, but they assume it must be some oversight or unintentional error. "My exalted master, President Trump. You've deported my wife and sent my children to a Nicaraguan gulag, and I'm thinking that there must be some sort of error. We've followed all the rules, and hate everyone you hate. Surely we're 'the good ones,' right? Right!?!"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

There are lots of modern examples of "Jews for Hitler", that's for sure.

If things get bad enough, I'm sure even the very monied class but that are one the "wrong" side of some kind of sorting - including people like Thiel - will find themselves on the other end of that gun and they will be the most Pikachu-faced if it happens. Again, they apparently learned nothing from history. I'm sure the well-heeled Jews under Hitler thought their money would protect them, too.

Thiel is gay and I'm more than sure that a mobbed-up government that is pointed at him would be more than happy to seize all his assets, redistribute to the "worthy" people, and throw him in prison. Doesn't matter if he identifies as a billionaire and has weird xtian beliefs that match with "maga" (whatever the fuck that term means - it's just baby-talk, and I have a feeling that just like fascism, it doesn't really have much of an ideology for a reason. It means whatever the current cult leaders says it means).

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The analogy I've always heard is "living inside the fence" versus "outside the fence". And how your perceived position shapes how you behave politically.

But I also see this painfully naive assumption that Democrats are actually for looser immigration policy or that a democratic administration won't end in your wife/kids getting the old heave hoe.

In the end, it's just two Have Nots arguing which plutocrat would trickle down on them better. There's no reason to vote for Trump, but no reason to vote against him either. Doubley so when you realize your vote isn't even impacting the election's outcome.

If every Republican had a crystal ball and could know with perfect certainty whether their immediate family would suffer from Trump's immigration policy... he would still be president today. The margins were too wide and the deck was too stacked.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i’ll never understand how someone can claim to be Christian and not be considered radical and “left wing” by the current standards of the Overton Window. To behave like Christ is, compared to what happens today, to be a fucking radical.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

They don't believe in the Christ you describe. They believe in Supply Side Jesus

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Huh. That’s odd. MAGA and the Catholics have being pedophiles in common. You think they would get along.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

They don't wanna share the kids

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I bet they're scared that the Pope is from Chicago and could run for president.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago

I am pretty sure being head the Vatican would be considered foreign nobility for purposes of the constitution.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Holy shit, could you imagine

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

President Pope sounds like a bad action movie. He would also be a cop too. And be one day from retirement. “President Pope, you’re a loose cannon. The mayor’s breathing down my neck. Hand in your gun and badge… and Bible.”

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

And they could bring Benedict out as a sidekick: "I was just enjoyin' my retirement. Now this."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Given what "maga" really is, it is little surprise that they are starting to say the quiet KKK parts out loud.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thought I'd actually applaud something decent being done by the Catholic Church. Can't wait to see Stephen Miller's violent rhetoric in response to this one 🤣

load more comments (2 replies)

That's one hell of a civil war brewing then.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well of course. Honestly I'm surprised it took this long. As I've said in the past, there's no bigger tent than a fascist who needs power, and no smaller one than a fascist who has power. Trump has gotten the votes he needed from the Catholics, so it's out with "We're all Christians here!" and in with "They're not real true Christians!" In this case apparently because they commit the sin of empathy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flamiera@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 day ago

To...own...the libs?

I mean, have fun, guys.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Huh, I guess the shared interest in sexual abuse wasn't enough to keep them together.

load more comments
view more: next ›