this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
38 points (85.2% liked)

Canada

10838 readers
871 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Eat only what you need. Repurpose what you don’t. Less wasted food means fewer emissions, less cooking and more easy, tasty leftovers.  

Eliminate or reduce your beef consumption—43 per cent of food-related emissions from the average Canadian come from beef alone. We could have had our beef and eaten it too if we’d followed the agreements laid out in the Kyoto Protocol, but we’re now at a point where food emissions also need to fall to avoid the worst of climate change.

Vote with your fork. This is a first step to demand change from your political leaders. The more we talk about our own dietary changes and what matters to us, the more politicians will begin to care about policies that bring positive changes to our food systems.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlareHeart@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I agree with the premise that each person does what they can, when they can.

However we can't forget to also put pressure on the giant conglomerates pumping out oil/gas emissions without consequence. No matter how vegan we go, it will never be enough if the big corpos keep getting away with being the worst outputters.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 8 points 6 days ago

The more sustainable the population becomes the less permissible it is for fossil fuel corporations to exist.

[–] _spiffy@piefed.ca 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've been living the bean life lately. Mostly due to kidney issues, but it's been awesome. We need more beans on Canadian diets.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago
[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

I have a suggestion: skip the pop especially skip pop from US-based companies. I think if you want to make changes to your diet this is the best change to make because it will also improve your health and water is almost free (when compared to pop).

What would save the world is less billionaires and stronger regulations for companies to stop waste.

[–] super_user_do@feddit.it 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Bro a handful of corporations are responsible for 70% of world emission and overall pollution and I should change my lifestyle but not them? fuck off, we need an actual revolution, not the revolution of the kitchen

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

These corporations are producing emissions as a byproduct of them producing products and services for consumer lifestyles; reducing these emissions will require them to compromise on price or quality, necessarily affecting consumers.

Consider - suppose that to reduce emissions, the government shut those corporations down and prevented others from increasing their emissions. You think your lifestyle would be unaffected? You might be unable to buy a car (or unable to fuel it). You'd be unable to fly overseas. Beef would probably be more expensive, causing people to eat less of it. Regardless, your lifestyle would be impacted. Like it or not, but if you're buying products and services from these corporations (directly or not) then you're part of the problem too.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Who’s buying the meat from JBS and Cargill then? Thus feeding the beast.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 4 points 6 days ago

Demand that your local city council enact the plantbased treaty.

[–] maypull@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

more research tainted with poore-nemecek (2018) and tilman-clark (2014). when will we stop relying on lca meta"studies"?