this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
558 points (90.7% liked)

You Should Know

43259 readers
67 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen alot of calls for violence in America. Whether it be directed at the president or Federal officers, many people are advocating for an escalation in response to the current situation.

And believe me, I do understand. what I see happening in America is horrifying. But all I am imploring is to really think about what your asking for. Because you can't put the genie in the bottle once you've left it out.

If you're really gung-ho about it, go and ask a Veteran of Iraq or Afghanistan about it and see what they think. If anyone will know about it they will.

I am going to link a YouTube Playlist. Its the Associated Press Archives of the Bosnian-Serbian war. Because THAT is what will happen if wide scale violence breaks out. Except what will happen in America will be a hundred times worse.

The Bosnian war was pretty much broken up along ethnic lines. "Well it's going to be Conservative VS. Liberal" you say. Except it won't be. It will be anyone having a grudge against someone going after them.

ALOT of personal animosity will be taken out in the first few weeks I feel.

And I think the Seige of Sarajavo will be writ large in American cities across the country. Imagine having to dodge sniper fire on your way to get to your job at Wendy's.

Because that's the other thing no one is thinking about. You are still going to have to make a living while this is all going to be happening. And the cost of everything will skyrocket. Shipping will probably have to be escorted from place to place because people will be stealing or even blockading locations because they're "damn dirty libs" or "Fascist Conservatives" Fresh produce will become a thing of the past.

Canada and Mexico will close their borders due to all the refugee's trying to cross. so if you thinking of doing it, do it the moment everything pops off because otherwise you won't get in.

Basically Civil war is going to the worst thing to happen in America in a long time. and the only good that comes out of it will be Americans will finally have first hand experience of real war torn violence. And maybe that will hopefully last for another two hundred years or so.

If America even survives the outcome that is.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 days ago

A Civil War II will probably end up at best leading to a Mad Max scenario or at worst, a Fallout scenario.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 67 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Not American, so feel free to stop reading.

It's ridiculous to me how you yanks go from zero to a hundred like this. Either normality or civil war. Like there is no in between? You have an authoritarianism problem. So resist authoritarianism. What makes you think that the only way to resist is shooting people? Resistance is a spectrum, and you have barely started using democratic means to fight back (you just started electing democratic socialists), much less active procedural and institutional warfare (is Bernie demanding a vote for every procedural point requiring a vote? Are the Dems actually using any rat fucking tactic to make the state ungovernable? Are your local and state governments really resisting beyond making angry noises?). You have barely tried non violent resistance (not the same as peaceful!) but you're such a violent culture that you jump straight to military solutions. Wtf. Those come at the very end, if everything else has failed. Has it? Nowhere near. So this talk about civil war, is that really useful?

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 15 points 5 days ago

Whilst I agree, the problem lies with the individualism of the general population rather than the collective mindset. The backwards-ass government system (i.e. no opposition government, the bastardisation of the 3 branches etc. and the power hungry head-of-state vs a Parliamentary system for example), the extreme "state-first" mentality that then struggles when the Federal system comes down on it and the "divide and conquer" tactics of corporations with the support of successive right-leaning governments. A judicial system that corrupted by politics and trying to guess what a bunch of ~~guys~~ slave-owning white landowners 250 years ago would have thought is also very very very very very very very dumb. The law is meant to be blind - it's why the statue used to represent it wears a blindfold, holds a scale and a sword.

The country is in need of a Civil Revolution rather than a civil war. Both sides are more similar than they realise, and generally want the same thing, and none seem to see the real enemy (CEOs, Billionaires etc.) due to all the propaganda.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (6 children)

The problem is that the steps between zero and a hundred are incremental rights which take decades to establish. If you are a non-American then you might have those steps already established, but currently the US does not. So once the status quo passes beyond the acceptable parameters the only possible solution is violence.

Another user I spoke with asked about collective rebellion, union strikes, and general resistance, but these don't work if the infrastructure isn't already in place. You can't start a strike if you don't have a union and your co-workers don't agree, you can't take up arms without at least a state level rebellion, most protests are effectively meaningless, and unless you are willing to give up everything (job, family, and well being) then you'll never amount a significant resistance.

For the most part people want to live their lives with the least amount of fucking up they can. So long as the republican's don't fuck up their shit too much they will keep their heads down and vote in the elections.

Democrats and states both follow the same rules. They will try to counter the Republicans, but if that means a government shutdown with old people and the poor going without assistance then they are willing to cave. So far we aren't at the point where any US group is willing to make real sacrifice to make a change, such as a fighting, going without, or causing their family to suffer.

You can’t start a strike if you don’t have a union and your co-workers don’t agree

This is a major point that those outside of the US seem to miss, I think. The sheer depth of contempt for unions and unionization I've experienced is a massive barrier to organizing any significant resistance. I'm very certain a majority of US citizens are unaware of what a general strike even looks like. Corporate propaganda has very successfully vilified and diminished unions for a long time.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 187 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

It's worthwhile you mention Sarajevo, and in reference to that I will post this tidbit posted by a MetaFilter user in 2009 regarding their experience in the siege of Sarajevo. I have it bookmarked and post it from time to time where it seems appropriate. The reality is though, you're correct, Americans by and large don't know what they're asking for.

Well, unlike the majority of you (I assume), I actually lived several years in a period of savagery and killing, during which nothing - food, water, electricity, phone, clothing, sense of safety, school, the ability to go out in public, etc - was available, except during totally unpredictable, brief and sporadic occasions.

Of those who couldn't leave my city, Sarajevo:

Some people (very few) were prepared for what they thought would be the "long haul" - this tended to be a couple of months. These people were widely seen as lunatics and dangerously pessimistic ones at that.

Most people were not at all prepared. This included my family. Many of those - like my family - considered the idea of "preparation" to be an affront to the decency we felt most people possessed. Were we wrong? Well, I don't know. We suffered greatly; my parents were killed. But speaking only for myself, I never felt I cheapened my soul by betting on calamity. Today, that still feels like it's worth something.

But here's the main point: "Preparing" for the disaster really didn't do anyone much good. Those who "prepared" ate a little better for a while. They stayed warmer for a few extra days. They enjoyed the radio for a while longer (via batteries.) But in the end, they ended up hungry, cold and bored too, just like the rest of us. Guns and weapons helped no one directly and were even of little to no use in the defense of Sarajevo, since they were toys compared to the shells, bombs and high-powered armaments of the attacking forces. The worst parts of war were psychological - the fear, anxiety, boredom, loneliness, paranoia, bad dreams. Respite from those things came with sharing food with a neighbor, finding a piece of clothing that would fit someone you knew, commiserating with others in your position, figuring out how to make make-up from brick or french fries from wheat paste and spreading this newly-acquired war knowledge around the mahala.

We knew who had extra food and supplies. For the most part, they weren't attacked or hassled or bothered. Contrary to what these survivalists say, those in dire times generally hold on to their personal sense of pride even more than they do in normal times. I'd take a bite of a friend's salad without bothering to ask in normal times. I'd never have done that in wartime, no matter how hungry I was.

Within the domain of those trapped in the city, civility greatly increased.

You often hear how Holocaust survivors felt guilt at surviving. Well, during war, that was a feeling everyone was aware of - people started dying right away (my parents were killed near the start of the siege, for instance) - and there was a palpable enough common sense of karma to make everyone into good Samaritans. None of us understood why we survived while others didn't. I shared food when I had it, even though I often knew I wouldn't have a crumb the next day. Which was no big achievement, because nearly everyone did the same.

Those who'd prepared, well, the majority of them shared their food and whatever else they had as soon as someone else was clearly in need. I can't swear it, but I think they felt a little foolish to have been so self-obsessed, and giving away that stuff might have lessened that feeling. There were a few people who hoarded things until they ran out of stuff - eventually everybody ran out of anything worth hoarding - and they soon became wishful beggars like the rest of us. Again, I can't swear it, but I hear stories, and it seems that these people suffer from post-war trauma, guilt and nightmares more than the rest of us.

Those survivalists, I feel sorry for them. It's no way to live.

posted by Dee Xtrovert at 9:33 PM on January 28, 2009

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 32 points 5 days ago

A great read, thank you.

This exemplifies why it's so important to learn how to grow your own food. If you're serious about "prepping" don't hoard tins of beans, learn how to grow beans.

Make your soil fertile now, learn the skills now, because it can take 3 years for a piece of land to become fertile enough to provide good harvests. It takes time to learn what you're doing. It takes time to get equipment, seeds, compost.

A network of small vegetable gardens can go a long way in helping reduce starvation.

Is it a silver bullet that guarantees survival? Of course not. Your crops can fail, your garden sabotaged, damaged, or robbed. But does it increase your, and your community's chances? Absolutely!

Start small, have fun, learn, and grow!

https://beehaw.org/c/greenspace

https://lemmy.world/c/gardening

[–] sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz 27 points 6 days ago

Powerful account

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

In real life when you get hit, hiding behind cover does not regenerate your health and picking up health packs or eating food does nothing.

Also most war will be 99% boredom and 1% sheer terror.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 79 points 5 days ago (13 children)

... Americans don't realize they're already in a civil war? Bro a city is occupied. Secret police roam freely. Tens of thousands disappeared.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (10 children)

That isn't a civil war. That is an autocracy. If the people across the state were coming in a militia to take over that would be a civil war.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

They are moving 1500 soldiers to Minneapolis to quell the "violence" which is basically people marching with signs and blocking traffic.

Ice agents are threatening to murder people and telling them they should have learned to be meek so they don't get murdered like Goode

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 5 days ago

I've yet to see a major media outlet call it what it is.

It's sheer cowardice at this point. The president himself has called it war.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 32 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Americans are sadly locked into the path of violence as the other path will force them to face their systemic racism, and corporate idolization which is clearly not going to happen.

It took Nicole Good to be face shot before people really started to react despite 4 other similar events with non white females and I am constantly shocked how many Americans defend corporations that are literally exploiting them. America is cooked unfortunately as like most humans, myself included, we tend to become blind with power.

[–] Lawyerator@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Renee Good was her name. Not Nicole. Sucks that attention was only given after a white LGBT woman was killed. Still sucks even more that she was killed. I am haunted by the pictures of her glove box. It was filled with stuffed animals for her child.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Corporations became the dominate force in our culture and in every culture around the world. 90% + of all policy in the whole world is written by corporations. There isn't a country that exist without widening income inequality.

It would be great if this was just an American problem. It isn't. The wealthy will use their favorite proxy the corporation to run humanity into the ground. They have already poisoned the entire planet time and time again. They are the biggest threat humanity has ever seen.

They make the Nazi look wholesome. Remember it was IBM that developed the numbering system for Jews and also helped figure out how many Jews needed to be cleared out of the Ghetto daily for the final solution. Likewise MS, Google, Meta, etc. have been giving material support to genocide.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] delial@lemmy.sdf.org 85 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If you’re really gung-ho about it, go and ask a Veteran of Iraq or Afghanistan about it and see what they think. If anyone will know about it they will.

My uncle that served in Iraq still wakes up screaming in the night. He's a shell of the man he used to be. Another vet my age I knew was absolutely erratic after serving. He couldn't hold a job and ended up homeless and assaulted someone for their spot under a bridge.

My whole family bears the scars of the PTSD from what my grandfather saw from WWII. He also woke up screaming for years afterward.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 49 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I had an old buddy who served in Vietnam. One time I asked him what it was like to kill someone. I'll never forget his answer.

"You know, when you've got your rifle trained on somebody, there for a split second you've got the power of God in your hands. You get to decide if that person lives or dies. Nobody should have that kind of power. I only wish I had known that before I had done things that I couldn't undo."

He said he still had nightmares all the time, even 45 years later.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 6 days ago (3 children)

"Do Not Split"

Learned about it from this episode of the Team Human podcast

But what is happening in Hong Kong is they come up with a slogan, which is translated as Do Not Split, which is, we know that some people are willing to be confrontational with riot police.

And when they are, that's going to cost the state in terms of not only resources, but it's going to cost the state in terms of political capital and support. And we know that there are some people who are not willing to do that. And we are going to abide by the protocol of Do Not Split, which means that we're not going to criticize them openly, and they're not going to criticize us openly.

If we're the pacifists, we're not going to have them criticize us for being sort of like, I don't know, limpid or flaccid or not courageous or whatever. And we're not going to criticize them for being more confrontational. And the thing is that the support is also tacit.

It's not like they have to come out and tell the media, oh, we approve of our more sort of confrontational colleagues. They just keep quiet. They just keep quiet.

Understanding that a range of tactics is probably going to be necessary. Nobody really knows what's going to work. But if everybody's pushing back against a particularly violent state, then everybody's really on the same side.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 6 days ago

You should really post this on its own. I think people in the USA would benefit from seeing and internalizing this principle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The first U.S. civil war never really ended, it has just gone into a long "cold" phase.

Those times are ending.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I could've ended if they hadn't given so many concessions to the slavers, but they let that shit fester and grow and now the whole country is the fucking nazi bar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 days ago

the problem with a civil war is collapse of the supply chain for most people, and you'll have to become useful to get protection

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

YSK: The average citizen doesn’t have much control over the cork in the bottle.

This administration is repeatedly and consistently provoking people. Randomly shooting people in the face, and talking about sending the military to Minnesota is going to cause things to boil over if the other people we elected don’t step in and force them to cool down.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (9 children)

None of us want to live in a war-torn state. That's why I and most others voted for harm reduction. What we're facing now is terrorism. The USAmerican people are being terrorized by federal forces.

People are not calling for violence for a economic policy we don't like, which is what incited the Confederacy to begin the first USA Civil War. We're dealing with federal forces who are hell-bent on terrorizing us. What politically-aware people have been calling for, for the better part of a year, is the next degree of harm reduction. Targeted political assassinations. Fighting ICE agents. Storming the capital, perhaps. With each month, this government gets more empowered and more violent.

Violence terrorizes people. We all know war is terrible. No one thinks the USA going through a Civil War will be exciting. People see violence and they want it to stop, and they see massive peaceful movements that have not worked, in the face of a government that shows no hesitation in threatening or attacking its people; and those people are desperate.

What is the alternative? We let federal agents keep shooting and abducting people until some magical aspect of Democracy manifests and pushes them out? How do we actually envision that happening? What do we do for the three years until our next presidential election? Every person who is killed, abducted, disappeared is a life permanently lost.

For those who talk about peaceful protests and voting the fascists out, how do you expect to win elections when your voters are being killed? It's not just the ICE agents, either, though they certainly are violent. Consider: Layoffs, Homelessness, Imprisonment, Emigration, Suicide. The people here today are not going to be the same people here in three years.

The reality is, the people of the USA are under violent occupation. We are living the terrors of war. Violence does not require mutual-consent; and when only one side chooses to fight, you end with a massacre. That is what we have been living through -- a slow-rolling massacre. No one knows what will stop this, but maybe, just maybe, ICE agents would think twice before going on deployment if half of the last three squads never made it home.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Yeah no shit. Who thinks that?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 days ago

The question is what the alternative would be. Look at history for the answer. The easy comparison would be Germany leading up to, during, and after World War 2, but that would be low-hanging fruit considering how very directly the US regime is trying to force other countries to join them. (Anschluss, anyone?) Look also at the countries where extremist regimes took over and didn't get forced out until years later and the damages they did to their country and the people living in it. Unfortunately too many examples there to name. The US regime and their stormtroopers will continue to harass, arrest, and outright kill people who have a legal right to live in the US simply over the color of their skin or otherwise until they are stopped. And they will most assuredly not stop by the power of fingerwagging and strongly stated words.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Great post.

However, from a European perspective all this has been a long time coming, ignoring all warnings and with open arms (pun not intended).

So for the US I don't see how it can be fixed without going through this.

I'm sorry.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 41 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

My roommate watched a woman get dragged from her wrecked car, bleeding and screaming for help, being disappeared by ICE. They were recording and I've seen the video. I'll probably never forget it. I carry a whistle now but I pray I'll never need it. We're like two weeks into whatever the fuck this is and I'm already sick of it. I'm tired of running to the window every time I hear a car alarm, I'm tired of wondering if I hear the wind or a whistle. I'm tired of worrying about more people I know getting abducted, and scrutinizing every vehicle that drives past if they're going to fuck with me because I'm visibly queer and also trying not to be mistaken for the gestapo occupying my city. Is this an occupation? And I know war is worse. Fuck all of this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

A real civil war wouldn't last longer than three weeks here in the US. A small group of whacked-out people love the idea of it, but they certainly have not thought it through. It's just a fun thought for them because they have never cracked open a history book and don't have any real perspective regarding what war actually means.

This is the country that couldn't go three weeks without a haircut or toilet paper in 2020. People would walk into their first empty grocery store, toting their big impressive AR-15 rifles, and then demand that the war be ended.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The next "civil war" will just be a series of Luigi-like instances. My prediction is that the justice system will simply start failing to get grand jury indictments like they did with the ham sandwhich throwing incident.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

you dont get battle lines until there's been a few years of mass killings on both sides, before Regime Loyalist and Opposition "states" or lines solidify.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 42 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I think there's gonna be a lot of Asian American stores getting looted if this happens.

Asian diasporas are always considered the universal "soft target", I mean just read the news.

We'd have LA Riots all over again, law enforcement will leave us to die while racist mobs lynch us.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 49 points 6 days ago

Everyone needs a rooftop Korean.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] eightpix@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago

Im glad you've said this. Before I saw The Death of Yugoslavia, I honestly believed that modern warfare was clean, clinical, and restricted to willing combatants. That the Geneva Conventions, various constitutional statements, and human honour and decency were a part of modern wars. At least since Vietnam.

No. I was disabused of that notion by this documentary. Yes, I agree, the BBC shouldn't have the last word on a war in Eastern Europe. The BBC probably shouldn't have the last word on anything. However, they did happen to have the first word — to me — on the importance of understanding how modern wars get started, how they progress, and chillingly, why they don't end. It's a sad, slow, solemn march into oblivion.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

More like This War of Mine, maybe.

A game so depressing I stopped playing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Everybody know it not a game but st some point there is no othet options and fight oppresion

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 26 points 6 days ago

I would prefer peace. But let's be frank, that isn't likely to happen, because the Trump Regime consists of people who don't value a peaceful, kind, and just world.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I doubt that America as we know it can survive, period. There needs to be a change - whether that's about wealth classes, political beliefs, or various -isms. We can't use a system that was intentionally broken to fix things. The words of slavers from 250 years ago are too weak. The way that things have developed across the regions of this massive, unwieldy, federation needs amendment.

Unfortunately, right now the pendulum is swinging hard in one direction. There's no meaningful fighters on the other side. So us little people have to cling to hope - and that hope is increasingly looking like it has to come from force, and from the barrel of a gun.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 7 points 4 days ago

I'm dead in a month as soon as any major part of our infrastructure/supply chain crumbles. yaaaay.

I do wonder if I'm on somebody's list.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago

I heard there's no respawns in IRL.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I think the country splits into multiple nations before a true all out conflict. Maybe a 4 part split.

Old South Northeast Some kind of Texas southern alliance with other states in the Louisiana purchase Northwest and Pacific coast.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 48 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The problem with this idea is that it assumes that those areas are politically aligned. I highly doubt people in liberal areas like Austin are going to be okay with being lumped in with whatever happens in Texas and I am confident that the Native Americans in Oklahoma will never be okay with it.

The divide in the US is largely rural vs urban not north vs south or east vs west anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›