this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
268 points (98.6% liked)

politics

28829 readers
1973 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Critics put Donald Trump on blast on Monday after he posted a message on social media threatening Iran with “Death, Fire and Fury.”

Writing on his Truth Social website, Trump said any attempt to block oil shipments would lead to an attack “TWENTY TIMES HARDER” ― and so severe that it will be “virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again.”

Iran has responded to the U.S.-Israeli military campaign by threatening to attack ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, effectively cutting off some 20% of the world’s oil. That’s triggered wild fluctuations in the market for crude oil, rising gas prices at U.S. pumps and fears of further economic pain should the conflict drag on.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 56 minutes ago

Consequences, when?

[–] X@piefed.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

lol next you’ll be telling me that raindrops, when not being blown in any other direction, frequently fall down. okay. 👍

[–] Ansis100@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The oil prices are affecting us in Europe too. Gas is getting wayyy more expensive. My car also isn't very fuel-efficient...

And I think this is wonderful news if it teaches that fuckface a valuable lesson.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Unfortunately necessities and commodities getting more expensive doesn't mean anything to the elites. Tarrifs and increased cost of living significantly disproportionately affects poors and working class people. For a rich person, fridges doubling in price is still a cheap purchase. For a poor person that needs a fridge and could hardly afford one before price doubled, they certainly can't afford one now. Once again the poors carry society on their shoulders. Gas went up? U think rich people even notice? Hell no. But us working people now have to decide between eating lunch on Saturday and driving to work next week.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Hey psst I'll sell you this old fridge I found with a dead cat in it if you sell some of your blood

-capitalism and its solutions

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

It will get the attention of the parasite class when nobody can afford to drive to work. There aren't enough electric car owners to keep the economy going.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

Not to mention with electric getting more expensive by the minute with ai and data center nonsense the ev thing might not be a solution anyways. Plus EV owners are not part of the poor/ working class I am talking about, anybody that can afford a 20k+ electric car is not half as poor as I am lmfao. I cried about spending 3 grand on my last shitter because the one before didn't even run me 900$.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago

They also spent a REALLY long time fighting EV and public transit development. They really have no idea how anything works or how to plan further than a few months but society will still act like they’re so smart they deserve billions.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 2 hours ago

His brain was never functional to begin with.

When God was handing out brains, he heard "trains" and said "no thanks, I'll drive myself."

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 30 points 4 hours ago

I read this same headline every two weeks since 2016 (great 4 year break in between)

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 48 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Our arsenal:

  • Slam
  • Torch
  • Blast
  • Hammer
  • Drag
  • Criticize
  • Oppose

Their arsenal:

  • Arrest
  • Murder
  • Disappear
  • Deport
  • Maim
  • Detain
  • Bomb

Gee guys I sure like our odds

[–] fatboy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

A compilation of tweets is just not news. Not that this threat is not important, but that I wish there were real reporting in this article.

It's hard to say what tweets count as. The White House has said they are official messages at times, and Musk was held legally required to purchase a company because of his statements made on the platform. At one point I believe they were all being archived to the library of Congress, not sure if they are anymore. Then again I believe Trump's are on his site, so who knows

[–] FaygoRedPop@lemmy.world 118 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

"People on internet are mad at stuff Trump says on internet."

Brilliant reporting. Why not make the article about how unhinged the shit he was saying was, not the reaction of people to it?

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 19 points 5 hours ago

Because it's HuffPost, which has always been more of a clickbait-farm for liberals than a journalism outlet.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

Don’t forget to give credit to individuals and organizations ‘slamming’ him.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Because one of those is journalism and the other is editorializing, most outlets have a section for both.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And they're all sane washing his bullshit 24/7

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, the famous Trump Sanewashing perpetrated by the Huffington Post with articles titled things like 'His Brain Is Broken'.

Pick your battles, dude. If you want to complain about the very real problem of Trump sane washing you might want to save if for an incident where that is what is actually happening.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You're really going to defend the Huffington Post?

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In terms of "are they sane washing Trump in this article?" Sure. They obviously aren't.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn't talking about this article specifically, I'm talking about US media as a whole. Including the Huffington Post

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago

Do you think that a discussion about an article that actually sane washes trump might be a better place to set up your soapbox for this particular complaint?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

love those em dashes, grok really pulling overtime for this one. or maybe openai now that the pentgon contract has been signed

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 67 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The US president is AI slop.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 43 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm no fan of AI, but don't blame this on it, this is 100% organic slop. It has neither the A, nor the I.

[–] normanwall@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago

N.I. - Natural Idiocy

The knights weren't saying it for no reason

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 42 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

He's threatening nukes, he already mobilized the bombs. Now would be a good time for other countries to cut the US off. US won't rally and rise up unless we suffer. Make us suffer you pussies.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It really does look like he’s trying to find an excuse to use them.

If he does he needs to go to be removed from office, and all countries need to sanction the US.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

WTF do you mean, "if he does?" He already needs to be removed from office now, and the notion that he's thinking about using a nuke only makes it even more imperative that he be removed before that happens!

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago

I agree with everything you said.

But if the US doesn’t grow a spine on this they’re fucked beyond help.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Would that happen? I doubt the US would remove him, would Europe be able to do any more than symbolic acts?

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

If he uses nukes it would be a hard line that most countries would be hard pressed to look past. If the US uses nukes in Iran then Russia will definitely use theirs in Ukraine and no European politician wants to be in the way of that fallout (literally and figuratively).

[–] linule@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

The entire world needs to stop. It’s seemingly being considered to drop nukes on millions of people like you and me for no reason. Hello? This is not a matter of tapping on little hearts and arrows on social media, we’re all financing this, in one way or another, and allowing it to happen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You just know the poor sucker with the nuclear football is sweating bullets and not sleeping right now.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Best case for the rest of us is that dude commits treason.

[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 30 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He absolutely has dementia or Alzheimer’s and he absolutely had a stroke or TIA at the 9/11 memorial (I’m sure it’s not the first time). He probably has a laundry list of other medical issues to boot.

Any other 80 year old man with this medical history is in a locked memory unit, but this one is ruining our fucking lives.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

He very clearly shit himself while on TV a few weeks ago, and its not headline news because reality is crazy town these days. I fully expect the day they announce he croaks to be a lie and they have been "Weekend at Burnies"ing him around for atleast 72 hours prior.

If that happens early next year around his terms half-way point I fully expect a "Death of Stalin" scenerio (from the begining of the film, where they have to find the best Dr in Moscow, but cant, because they threw them all out of the country and finding one would mean the violated Stalins orders) because if Vance has to server for more than half the remaining term, he can only run for re-election once.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago

What's the excuse for almost the entirety of the Republican party and the accompanying RINOs then? The fact is that he is such a compulsive liar that nothing he says matters, he's just a noise maker that works it into a distraction from what he is doing.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"Torch", "Blast", etc. are funny words that mean nothing to someone who doesn't pay attention to anyone other than himself.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Been seeing a lot of "torch" lately... I'm thinking the headline writers in the US see "torch" as the new "slam".

[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Headline writers torch headlines with the word “slammed”

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

What are they gonna use next? Pulverize? Disintegrate? Ram?

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He remembers blaming Biden for high gas prices. Now he's afraid of being seen as responsible for the same. Which he demonstrably is. So his threats will escalate as his fear intensifies.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know. That would require like 3 or 4 coherent thoughts in a row.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 5 points 3 hours ago

I get that it's fun to mock this man, but I feel like it also defangs the perception of him. People were laughing at how unlikely his victory would've been back in 2016 and now we're here ten years later. This man is evil. He's impulsive, and temperamental, and incredibly powerful.

He's caused immense suffering among people, he's stomping all over their rights, he's kidnapped a head of state and he's now started a war. Please, take the danger this man represents seriously.

[–] Daxelman@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They didn't torch shit he's not on fire.

[–] doug@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›