this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
931 points (99.5% liked)

News

39113 readers
3112 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The federal judge, who cited Dolly Parton in his ruling, found that the state law violated the First Amendment.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 175 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

In his ruling, Hittner mentioned Dolly Parton, whose death was announced Tuesday, and criticized the law’s definition of banning performances that “[appeal] to the prurient interest,” citing people who would chastise Parton “as a voluptuous sex symbol because of her big hair, flamboyant clothes and breast exposure.”

“There are ‘erotic’ elements in countless popular performances that could be subject to both civil and criminal penalties under S.B. 12,” he wrote.

One of the plaintiffs in the case, a drag queen who performs under the name Brigitte Bandit, impersonates Parton in her performances. Bandit celebrated the ruling on social media Tuesday, posting a screenshot of the decision and captioning it, “Drag is free speech, bitch.” She announced she would also perform as Parton, who gave her a rhinestone guitar as a gift in 2023, at an Austin bar Saturday in her honor.

Even from the grave, Dolly is making the world a better place.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“There are ‘erotic’ elements in countless popular performances that could be subject to both civil and criminal penalties under S.B. 12,” he wrote.

Yeah, lol. That's the real heart of the matter. If you're going to ban such public performances, then you need to ban ALL public performances that have even the slightest hint of it. And good luck with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think she's buried yet.

[–] Tango@piefed.ca 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I dreamed I saw Dolly Parton last night

Alive as you and me

Says I, "But Dolly, you're 24 hrs dead"

"I never died" says she

"I never died" says she

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Wow. Wasn't expecting a Joe Hill reference today. That works extremely well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's unfair. They need to ban those because they want to go but don't want to be seen there.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then maybe they should attend in drag.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

They have the white dress and hat already.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 97 points 1 week ago (11 children)

If you think abortion is wrong, just don't have one.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gay marriage enters the chat.

[–] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Right? If you aren't interested in a gay marriage it's incredibly easy to avoid entering into one. I've managed to go my entire life without being gay-married. Heck, I'm not gay-married right now! Yet despite what Fox News tells conservatives, there's no gay mafia threatening or intimidating me for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jaycifer@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Okay, maybe I’ll get hate for this, and to be clear I fully support a woman’s right to abortion, but to the people who truly believe abortion is wrong this is basically saying “if you think murder is wrong, just don’t kill anyone.”

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Almost every person I know who thinks abortion is morally wrong also supports the death penalty and war for almost any reason and police violence. They only seem to care about unborn fetuses that are not 'alive' independently from the body they inhabit. And most think that the mother's life is fine as a fetus' collateral damage. Therefore I don't for a minute believe that many of those who profess to morally care about life/murder, really care about either.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And the reply to every single one of those people is, "If you think abortion is wrong BECAUSE it is murder, then what are your feelings on the death penalty or war?"

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago (8 children)

It's not the gotcha you think it is. Murder is defined as the intentional killing of an innocent person, and the death penalty and war don't don't intentionally involve innocent people.

It'd be like saying "oh, you oppose murder? What about self defence???"

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AgentSeven@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

But being absolutely against murder doesn't end up with other people being murdered, so it's a terrible analogy that they are just allowed to get away with. If you stop doctors from "murdering" babies, then mothers die as a result, full stop. They don't even argue that point, they just don't care, so arguably, they're no better than the murderer in their own stupid analogy.

All of this is a religious refusal to admit that biology is a nasty, difficult and ugly business and not the perfect product of their all-loving God, and it's just plain stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] WakeUpSmashPots@lemmy.today 75 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The "freedom" crowd always seems to be quite upset at other people's freedoms... 🤦

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The fReEdOm crowd sure wants to take away the freedom of a lot of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 63 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Conservatives want small government when it's stuff they want to do, and big government when they don't. In-groups to protect, out-groups to bind. Bad people. Cartoon villains.

Glad this judge seems sensible.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Bad people.

That's why they're all so religious of the Christian persuasion. They forgive themselves, the in group, but not others, the out group, for whom they reserve Old Testament treatment.

They care about state's rights to ban what they want banned but federal law when states allow what they want banned.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've never experienced a drag show against my will.

[–] MrOtingocni@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

...I feel like that is a challenge somehow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 35 points 1 week ago

It's sure is neat how many GOP "issues" boil down to not understanding consent.

[–] Ravenheart@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 week ago

Republicans scream "freedom" louder than anyone, but they prove consistently that it's just a slogan to them. Texas has outlawed gambling, marijuana, reproductive healthcare, gay marriage, and effectively outlawed porn. And they're all up in the business of trans and gay folks. And they shove their religion down your throat every chance they get. I don't think they understand the meaning of freedom.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Excited for the Supreme Court to decide states have the power to impose dress codes on the entire population.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They want it banned because they fucking love it and they can’t square it with their bigotry so banning it is the only way to make the gay thoughts go away

It’s ok Texans you can reject your upbringing and be yourselves. The thoughts aren’t wrong, Pastor is

[–] pega_sus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Incorrect. They want it banned so that they can arrest trans people under sex offenders laws then use that as an excuse to execute them.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

This is correct. While some of them are ashamed of their own feelings/desires and want that banned so it isn't a temptation, the vast majority are going after this as a way to hurt people they want to hurt. Why they want to hurt them can be stem from many things.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How can you expect these bigots to stay away? What kind of solution is that? Why wont someone think of hate and intolerance for once.

/s

[–] ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've come to the conclusion that the people who are pushing for this type of legislation or rules have a deep seated homoerotic side to them.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's a reason Grindr crashes around Republican conventions.

Also, Trump and Giuliani did drag together before.

[–] CalemitousVariantK@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Just don't go

🤯

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Having been to a drag show, it's really no different than a fashion show. More clothing, actually.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The good ones have more jokes and more singing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

It really is that fucking simple

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago

You mean to tell me all of the republicans don’t have to go to drag shows? They can’t resist.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In 2015, Paxton was indicted on state securities fraud charges relating to activities before taking office;[3] he pleaded not guilty. After Paxton fulfilled a pretrial agreement for restitution to the victims, ethics training, and community service, the charges were dismissed in 2025. In May 2023, Paxton was impeached by the Texas House of Representatives by a vote of 121–23, leading to his suspension.[4] The articles of impeachment included allegations that Paxton gave preferential treatment to a political donor who bribed him, misapplied public resources and made false statements against whistleblowers, obstructed justice in the securities fraud trial against him, and made false statements regarding his financial interests.[5][6][7] In September 2023, the Texas Senate voted 16–14 to acquit Paxton of all articles of impeachment, ending his suspension from office.[8][9]

On July 28, 2015, a state grand jury indicted Paxton on three criminal charges:[271] two counts of securities fraud (a first-degree felony) and one count of failing to register with state securities regulators (a third-degree felony).[272][273] Paxton's indictment marked the first such criminal indictment of a Texas attorney general in thirty-two years since Texas attorney general Jim Mattox was indicted for bribery in 1983.[274] The complainants in the case are Joel Hochberg, a Florida businessman, and Byron Cook, a Republican and former member of the Texas House of Representatives.[275][276] Paxton and Cook were former friends and roommates while serving together in the Texas House.[276] Three special prosecutors were trying the state's case.[277]

There's even more on Wikipedia. What a fucking crook

-Wikipedia

Sounds like a republican presidential candidate.

[–] SwissArmyKazoo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminds me of that one South Park episode.

"If you don't like America you can get out."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't wait for this to get appealed to the supreme court for a 5-4 bullshit decision

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Fucking good.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Free speech motherfuckers! It's a double edged sword, but by fuck does it have both edges

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's amazing that anybody would waste time trying to ban this or think a ban could withstand the inevitable challenge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Does this only apply to Texas, because Ohio has a similar thing the are doing “for the children”

load more comments
view more: next ›