this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
449 points (98.3% liked)

Risa

7500 readers
1 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 78 points 2 years ago (5 children)

This guy wiped out an entire race with a thought and your plan is to do what exactly?

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

Me personally? I’m going to back away slowly without giving him my name.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 28 points 2 years ago

It's like that scene in "The Dark Knight"

Lucius Fox : Let me get this straight, you think that your client, one of the wealthiest and most powerful men in the world, is secretly a vigilante, who spends his nights beating criminals to a pulp with his bare hands, and your plan is to blackmail this person?

[Reese's face falls and Fox smiles]

Lucius Fox : Good luck.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm sure Picard could get a hold of Q and make a deal.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Q would have said,

"Oh the Husnock? Horrible, simply horrible species. Good riddance. Did you ask me here to give Uxbridge a medal or something? Because he certainly doesn't deserve it! Why I've already genocided three species this morning and didn't even get a thank you."

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

With a thought, because he was pissed off, and Wesley's big brain idea is to fuck with him. Picard had the wisdom to shrug and go "whatcha gonna do?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That guy put himself in solitary confinement, forever. What could the feddies do to him that is more fitting?

[–] BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago

Cruel and unusual much?

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pipe in an endless loop of "Baby Shark" and Justin Bieber?

[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Taylor Swift. I've got that "wildest dreams" one stuck in my head. It's an anxiety thing.

[–] sirblastalot@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is it really confinement if you can leave of your own volition?

Also, hang him.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, let's put a noose around the neck of someone who is essentially a god.

[–] sirblastalot@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's he gonna do about it? Besides, Picard already bosses around a god all the time.

If you really are too scared, we can make Sisko do it.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Sisko would probably have a fit.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 54 points 2 years ago

I mean, I sort of imagine it to be less the "rule on the books" part, and more the "do we actually have the physical capacity to enforce those rules" end of it. They cant really imprison him (I mean while he's feeling guilty he might stay willingly, but they cant keep him in if he eventually changes his mind, so itd more be him imprisoning himself). Trying to despite the futility of it would seem somewhat dangerous, because again, if he should ever change his mind, you clearly dont want to seem hostile to something with that kind of power, especially when you dont have it. Saying "Our law is not sufficient for you" could just be interpreted as the most diplomatic way given his mental state to justify leaving and not returning.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 43 points 2 years ago (3 children)

To be fair Janeway wasn't around at the time, so they didn't have any examples of genocide to go off of.

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Didn't Sisko wipe out a whole planet because fuck you Eddington?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (5 children)

He just made it uninhabitable by humans. Not exactly the same as wiping it out, but since it forced displacement of a whole planet, it was genocide.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Phlox, Janeway, Sisko

Damn. Lots of genocide from the good guys.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Why not Phlox?

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If the Federation was in the business of putting higher beings on trial, don't you think the second they learned Q was human they'd slap him in a courtroom so fast it'd make his head spin?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Hold up. Q is human??

Fuck me. That's big spoilers. When am I gonna find this out?

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Later on we find out he was just 2 Q kids in a trenchcoat pretending to be human

[–] HeapOfDogs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I summon thee, @Stamets to do your duty

[–] bajabound@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

If these are spoilers you are about 30 years behind.

QTwo that I can remember: Q got temporarily kicked out of the continuum (reference d above), also when Q got banished in the asteroid and Janeway let him out, he became human, then committed suicide.

[–] VindictiveJudge@startrek.website 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Note that Q and Q are not the same person.

[–] SkyeHarith@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Of course. A Q may be a Q, but not all Q are the same Q

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 years ago

I was talking about the first Q, of course.

The case with the second Q was technically a civil suit.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah I'm only a couple seasons into TNG.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

He is in one episode.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Genocide requires intent. Whereas this alien just had a fleeting moment of anger at the time of his wife being murdered.

Can he really be tried for genocide? It's hard to say, but I'd say not. We all have dark intrusive thoughts, and in this instance it had disastrous consequences.

It's all moot anyway. If you have no means or intention to enforce a law, does it really exist?

[–] gbuttersnaps@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

Second degree species slaughter

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Ah, a heated gaming moment. We've all been there.

[–] Samy@lemmings.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's why manslaughter is different than murder

[–] JAM@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The heat-of-passion is something to argue to mitigate culpability. Yes, he killed an entire species, and wasn't exactly justified, but his emotions and passions were inflamed by the aliens murdering his wife making his actions involuntary.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah but we aren't talking heat-of-the-moment shoving someone into traffic during a bar fight, we're talking heat-of-the-moment naughty thought during an aerial bombardment from a hostile force where his wife was killed.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Genocide requires intent.

Is that actually, legally, true?

In other words, does the word identify the cause, or the effect?

Can he really be tried for genocide? It’s hard to say, but I’d say not.

How so? The facts seem self-evident.

It’s all moot anyway. If you have no means or intention to enforce a law, does it really exist?

You can still classify someone though in such a way, in hopes that in some future time you can enforce the law on them, having being previously judged as a criminal.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 10 points 2 years ago

Yes, genocide is intentional, it's in the definition.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Genocide does require intent, yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhereGrapesMayRule@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shut up, Wesley! We must be circumspect with those who could visit genocide upon US with a thought. Also, don't bring up how often I challenged Q when he could have done the same or I'll just tell you to shut up again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Genocide is systematic.

This was instantaneous.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago

Yea, but genocide is like way to much paperwork

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

The dude snapped when he's loved ones were killed, that is considered exculpatory of violent actions in almost all legal systems. The difference is that instead of a knife or a gun he had almost omnipotent powers of destruction.

In an ideal society he would get psychological counseling to deal with the trauma and ensure it doesn't happen again, but I think it's obvious he was a bit above Troi's pay grade.

[–] Tischkante@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

"What is your kind called?"

"We are Ferengi."

load more comments
view more: next ›