this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
400 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

15391 readers
2156 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 139 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For anyone who can't find them... :D

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's interesting that only one out of the lot of them was (at least within the last 6 months) gay. All the rest with same-sex relations were bisexual (at least within the last 6 months).

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I might be explained by the fact that it's a lot harder to find a partner if you are gay and most of them outsource their search

[–] thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Probably more just that this was the 90s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

And those are the few bisexuals. Because the gays... Well those are a complete graph basically.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Damn I wanna know this guy's secret!

[–] littletranspunk@lemmus.org 58 points 1 year ago (9 children)

They're probably in touch with their emotions and express them in a healthy way and aren't afraid of intimacy outside of sex and romantic relationships

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would have been pretty cool for me if my parents weren't traumatized angry damaged people

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was just about to point that out!

What a machine

[–] RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

aph apparently is real

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A striking lack of single dots that should be hovering around these.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would you consider that a romantic or sexual relation? Or both?

[–] mkhopper@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Depends on which hand you use.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

The lines are relations. The dots are people.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That one circular chain of people who seemed mostly to agree of having either two gfs or two bfs and never crossing another person in the chain...

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I kept looking at that too. It's crazy to me that there are only 2 cycles in the graph and one is the big accidental one. It honestly makes me think that either something must be wrong with the data, or it's reflective of some deep principle of math or sexuality (e.g. that people won't fuck around within their close social grouping nearly as readily as they will with people on the outskirts of it).

[–] jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 1 year ago

The authors wrote that they were surprised too and went back to talk to the students and apparently there was an unwritten rule that you don’t date the ex of the new partner of your ex. So if Bob and Alice split up and Alice starts dating Ben, then Bob should not date Ben’s ex Alison.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've spotted five cycles.

  1. The big boy.
  2. Six member cycle at the top of the big boy.
  3. Four member cycle with that guy who slept with nine girls.
  4. A second cycle with that same guy.
  5. That three way over to the right.

It's possible there's more but I'm pretty sure that's it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also feels weird there's only one same gender connection (female to female) as far as I could see in that whole thing...

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

There's a male-male one on the rightward branch of the ring structure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They'd have to lie about who they slept with, and I expect the other person might have something to say about that if it was not true.

I wonder if they verified each claim from both sides.

Edit: it's a scientific paper, so there's no need to wonder!

In fig. 2, and in all discussions presented here, all romantic and sexual relationship nominations linking students are included, whether or not the nomination from i to j was reciprocated with a nomination from j to i.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

whether or not the nomination from i to j was reciprocated with a nomination from j to i.

Oh, so there was no bullshit filter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

These aren't all sexual relationships. So if someone says "I had a crush on X", maybe there would be a line. Even if X did not have a crush back. Maybe one date is enough for a line.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There are 6 people who've had gay sex that I could find and all but one of them are bi (or at least bi-curious). That seems like a statistical anomaly.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 1 year ago

It's a 90s high school, somewhat rural and religious, according to the article. Either there really were few homosexual relationships there, or the students didn't want to reveal them.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You think?

I think people feel liberated to say they're gay these days, so there are much more people claiming to be gay than in previous decades. On the other hand, there's still a lot of homophobes and also quite some biphobes around, so there's probably a lot of bi people that present as hetero or even gay.

I'd assume that most people are at least a little bi, and that they'll try that out in high school even if they later decide they won't pursue it.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not long ago I saw a woman's profile on tinder in NYC that said "No bi men". I guess it's good that she put her phobia right out front like that.

[–] jak@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I’m a 90s kid, with a stepsister the same age (who grew up in a Massachusetts college town, at that). When I was in college, I dropped my then boyfriend’s ex’s name in a conversation with my dad and stepsister (he was out already and didn’t make a secret of anything, he was cool with it, I swear). My stepsister asked all shocked if I knew he was bi when we started dating and then explained that she’d never date a bi guy, because she could never “be sure”. My dad made a boomery joke and said something noncommittally biphobic.

I’m so grateful I had that conversation before I came out to my family. I’m bi and an afab egg. I just married a bi man, and I told him pretty early on that I don’t know what the situation with my gender is yet. His response was “that’s why we date bi people, we like all the situations,” which had never occurred to me (sometimes I’m dumb), but it was a perfect level of humor and acceptance for the moment.

I’m sorry, this was a super long and mostly irrelevant comment. I intended to agree that biphobia is present in the people and places you’d least expect, even when straight up homophobia isn’t (stepsister was a member of the gsa and loved pride parades)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

The line does not necessarily mean they had sex.

[–] mmuser@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ience_memes@mander.xyz-10839295 They live in their own world..

[–] Freeman@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

There are 63 dedicated couples, nothing more

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

This is actually very interresting. I always found it hard to understand how some people can have so many sexual partners, and then there are people with very few of sexual partners. I had this theory that there must be some subculture of people who are really into this, date eachother in this group which causes their number to increase abnormally. It was just a silly theory but this sort of supports it?

[–] Fleur__@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Why are there 2 horizontal parallel lines instead of just one with a 2 bellow it?

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I'm surprised to see that a few people have had 5 or 6 sexual partners while in high school.

Edit: missed the guy with 9!

[–] jak@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sexual or romantic partners.

I “dated” a classmate for a month at 14 until he wanted me to sit on his lap and I broke up with him because I felt like I’d be too heavy but didn’t want to admit that, so I didn’t know how to talk to him about it.

If you’d asked me at 14, if he was a romantic partner, on god I’d have said yes.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jak@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

I believe it’s the most embarrassing story I’ve put online, so thanks lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

People in the comments straight out believing all of it are sex relationships... Read the paper, or at least the headline.

[–] TheOakTree@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The one guy who got with 9 people... is he a liar or a rizzler?

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I imagine they has to be confirmed from both sides...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

Wow, that's literally not me.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

some of the subtrees here made me say "wtf is going on here"

[–] jabrd@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is not nearly as much gay sex on this chart as I would've guessed. Just the one bi girl hookup in the second from the right tree at the top. Actually is that a threesome or do you think they just all screwed at different points in time?

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well it is a 20 year old study. Attitudes towards LGBT people were much less accepting back then. The participants in this study are now between the ages of 34-38 most likely. Probably a lot of people in the closet and keeping their relationships discreet or not having relationships, and some that haven't realised that they're gay yet.

If you did this study today, there would be a lot more gay sex, but probably less than we'd guess still. LGBT people are still a minority after all.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The relationships were from 1993-1995. Everyone in the graph is in their late 40s. So everything you said about attitudes is probably just more true.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›