this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
48 points (94.4% liked)

Canada

10133 readers
630 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Michel Rochette, president of the Quebec branch of the Retail Council of Canada, sees the Biden administration's message as a "signal'' couched in diplomatic language.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Say what you want about Québec's language laws; what's a nuisance to American business interests is most likely good for the people.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

To the extent that I have an opinion on this law, it certainly won't be moved based on it's impact on American businesses.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Hue. If French is threatening English as a language of commerce for the Americans, that means Quebec is going in the right direction.

I don't agree with all the policies put in place by the Quebec government, but I'm giggling as I read this article. It's good news for the French language.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How about Biden addresses his own country's cultural issues before weighing in on the neighbours.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s an economic issue not a cultural one for them

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US should adopt Chinese as an official language, in order to make it easier to engage with Chinese businesses.

It's an economic issue.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

The US doesn’t have official languages

[–] kfet@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago

Come on. This is very clearly “howaboutism”.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, in this case it's, "Mind your business." Quebec's language laws are not the USA's concern.

[–] kfet@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's exactly what USA are trying to do, minding their own business.

It's a law directly impacting all businesses operating in Quebec.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. Quebec law is not the USA's business. American owned businesses understood they would be subject to Canadian law when they set up shop here.

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

An "advisor for the United States Trade Representative" raised concerns.

[–] flooppoolf@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

The people: enact change

The politicians: