this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
696 points (99.9% liked)

politics

23643 readers
2794 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An American citizen born and raised in California is unsettled after receiving an e-mail from the US Department of Homeland Security ordering him to leave the country "immediately."

Aldo Martinez-Gomez received the DHS notice on April 11, threatening "criminal prosecution" and fines if he does not depart within seven days.

Martinez-Gomez works full-time assisting immigrants in court for a non-profit and believes his advocacy work may have placed him on the government's radar.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 175 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is why I said, the first time it happened with that immigration lawyer, she should have immediately brought it to a judge.

This will keep happening until there's some kind of court action.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 107 points 1 month ago

And then it'll just keep happening because there is zero enforcement.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 110 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is why they aren't allowing due process, which would expose many more "mistakes". There's likely many more who were already sent to the El Salvador concentration camp than just Kilmar Abrego Garcia. For example, this poor guy. How many more?! 😠

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These aren't mistakes. The cheeseburger Gestapo are coming.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yup. They are seeing how many people they can disappear without anyone noticing

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Martinez-Gomez works full-time assisting immigrants in court for a non-profit

This is quite the Hanlon's Razor situation.

There have been a number of US citizens who have received these emails, all of them do some kind of work related to immigration. It's pretty clear that whoever sent out these emails just collected every email related to immigration work, and sent out a mass email. That satisfies Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

But! The fact that they're doing this without even a passing effort at accuracy, with no concern about getting it wrong, shows how it's motivated by malice too. It's the ICE version of a reckless homicide, they're doing something they have to know would normally get them fired if not charged. But, they don't care because the current racist administration is going to revel in the pain.

So, it's a weird situation where Hanlon's Razor is both right and wrong.

[–] Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem with "they're just incompetent", is that it let's malicious people feign stupidity. And if it is a combination, it doesn't matter which aspects are one or the other. They are dangerous all the same and shouldn't be allowed to continue hurting people. But a combination of apathy, indoctrination, and infiltration means they'll likely never see any real consequences. Or if they do, they were likely expendable and their excision doesn't accomplish anything. People need to, at a minimum, vote. And preferably get more involved. Organize. Start local.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

It may let malicious people feign stupidity, but that doesn't mean you have to just forgive them.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is there reason to believe that Hanlon's Razor is correct?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Occam's Razor comes from a 14th century priest who studied logic. It's been gone over by philosophers in the centuries since and is generally considered valid.

Hanlon's Razor comes from a joke book published in 1980.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hanlon's Razor is basically a special case of Occam's Razor.

Making a mistake or doing something stupid is easy. Conspiring to do something malicious is not as easy. The simpler explanation is generally that something is a mistake rather than an elaborate conspiracy. So, Occam's Razor says that the simplest explanation (a mistake) is probably the right one.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fwiw Occam's razor is actually a little more precise than "choose the simplest explanation". Specifically, it defines what "simplest" actually means, in such a way that makes it easier to see how you could describe Hanlon's razor as a special case of Occam's.

Occam's razor is that you should choose the solution which requires the fewest assumptions. Assuming someone made a mistake is precisely one assumption. That they were acting maliciously requires several, including having the motive to do it and, in a case involving large organisations, having the capability to cover it up.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From a logical perspective, if you're trying to discover the truth of something you're inevitably going to start weighing and eliminating variables. It makes sense to start from the absolute bottom, prove or disprove that, then move on.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's just razors all the way down...

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Is it? Hitchens' razor says that you've provided no evidence for your turtle-like stack of razors, so your claim can be dismissed without evidence.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

While true, the intent behind Hanlon's has been expressed for millennia. The Principal of Charity (which was only named in the 1950s)

Basically, never assume the worst about someone.

The problem here is when there is actual malice. But that's when Occam's razor comes in.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

No. And it's a boon to "people" like the Trump regime.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Fuck these fixing incompetent fascist.

Honestly as a American born Asian American, I'm just wondering when this will be happening to me.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First they came for the ..

Doesn't matter when.

It will.

Unless you and everyone else start to speak up for the others.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

speak up? how about get armed and coordinated?

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Same. I was telling my wife I'm legitimately afraid to be walking around by myself now. I used to feel safe wherever I went and now I am always looking over my shoulder or scoping things out before I get out of my car...just to get groceries or something.

This is fucked.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup. I've told my wife that when they do come, I'm not one to go quietly.

Remember that 2A is for everyone, pepper spray is legal, and check your knife laws and your 1st amendment right to protest is still a thing.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I actually just got one of those relica practice pistols that uses CO2 cartridges to shoot pepper balls at up to 350fps.

It's non-lethal, but it'll still hurt a bit.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The point of the pepperball gun being? You know they'll shoot you dead when they spot it, right?

Might as well be carrying the real thing instead.

[–] Ianthe__Tridentarius@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not everyone has the ability to kill someone, even in self defense. Some folks aren't built to take lives, and there's nothing wrong with that.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fair enough but in that case maybe don't carry a gun at all. Like I said, it's basically suicidal.

Regardless of the current, evolving circumstances, law enforcement officers treat any gun as a deadly weapon. So they will shoot first & ask questions later.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Come on man, these Gestapo would treat being completely unarmed as a gun, especially if you have tattoos or dress upper end urban street attire as it's been reported.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Fair, but I don't have a CC permit and this is technically legal for me to carry. If real agents show up, I'm fucked regardless. But if wannabe white supremacists in my area want to play gravy seals, it will do just fine.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe you should try to move to Canada.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm working on it. Family isn't having it, but they're coming around slowly with each passing hellish day.

I'm also waiting for my passport renewal. Fingers crossed.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Good luck, stay safe!

[–] Bonus@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago

First saw this pop up on LA local news IG account, knew something was up with all the trolling responses dominating. There's really no way to even report fake/suspiscious accounts over there. Very glad/relieved to see rational comments here.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hope he gets armed guards. ICE is a trafficking gang.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

this requires coordination. we have to work harder.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

If I were a judge, him using “I'm not trying to be…” would be all the evidence I’d need to prove he’s an American citizen. They must think I’m Boo Boo the Fool if they deport that man.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In an email? I would have just, rightfully so, assumed it was some type of scam.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is a scam backed by the executive branch.

[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

I am now completely jaded. Whatever faith I had in institutions has completely eroded. If nobody gets held accountable, who's to say everything isn't a scam? I guess you gotta just use the duck method.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they just open the database and search for "gomez"

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One of these days they'll mess with the wrong Gomez

[–] AugustWest@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where are they getting these emails from? I don't mean where they are sent from, but the email addresses? Do US citizens share their email with the government?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AugustWest@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I thought most Americans did it through a third party online or a service. Is there a place to put an email? Is it required? Do people actually do it?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

You login using your email or your phone number. When you sign up to the IRS system you use your email. They have it. in this case its probably due to him helping folks with their immigration status and a distinct lack of intelligence when harvesting information. After all these are some of the lowest IQ fascists ever.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Criminal prosecution” requires a system of law. However the lawless dictator that overthrew the throne has no intention of acknowledging that there is a system of law in place that doesn’t benefit him directly.

So, this could end poorly.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the lawless dictator that overthrew the throne

Beginning to wonder why we have a throne to begin with.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

We don’t. It was sarcasm.