this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
1259 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

8559 readers
2599 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

As soon as I was old enough to understand what “pledge allegiance” meant, I refused to participate. It’s antithetical to everything America was supposed to be about. Allegiance is something a subject owes to a sovereign. If you live somewhere that still has ties to monarchy like Canada or the UK, then it would make some amount of sense. In the US, however, it’s literally nothing more than authoritarian indoctrination.

Needless to say, that got me in trouble a lot, especially in new schools or with new teachers.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

It was always about obedience.

[–] Bloomcole@crazypeople.online 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's nationalistic propaganda, not woke

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In the US, the brainwashing towards Fascist favorites like Nationalism starts when they're still children.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Bloomcole@crazypeople.online 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

100% brainwashing.
As a European I feel somewhere between uncomfortable and apalled watching this.
At least when it's so over the top when they drag out the comically huge flag and have some murder jets fly over at a sports game I can laugh and shake my head.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Did you watch the video? WKUK is satire. Except for this one. Totally serious and one hundred percent true.

[–] Bloomcole@crazypeople.online 1 points 18 hours ago

just the first 2 seconds so I guessed it was the 'normal' US hypernationalistic stuff.
And with americans you never know when they're joking, sarcastic or whatever, they say the most insane things and mean them. And I did see the other one, I think on the Deprogram sub.

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 118 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I always thought the pledge of allegiance stood out as a bit of a strange brainwashing exercise for the free and fair democracy the United States seeks to be. In fact IMO the nationalism it represents and instils in Americans opened the door to MAGA.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

America has always had a contradiction at it's heart: It purports to represent high minded ideas about freedom, egalitarianism, peace, democracy, secular enlightenment ideals, etc... while simultaneously being none of those things for most of it's history. A country built on genocide and slavery, a government that excluded nearly everyone from participating in it, extreme inequality, a war every few years, laws based on religious sentiments of the majority, etc...

That the story it tells itself is so at odds with it's actual identity is a testament to the power of propaganda and self-delusion. I think part of how people try to resolve this contradiction is by refocusing the story to be about steady progress: We may not have always lived up to our ideals, but that was in the past, we learned from them, and got better, as they ignore the problems of today and even actively resist changes that they would applaud if they read it in a history book or saw it in a documentary.

It's not wholly unique in this kind of narrative self-delusion, but I think America's relative lack of longer term history and ethnic identity makes the story a more central part of it's identity. The pledge is one part of this.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

What makes American brainwashing somewhat unique is that it includes the notion of individuality, originality, free speech and personal uniqueness, whilst successfully managing to railroad all of those things within a set of acceptable parameters.

You’re encouraged to speak freely as long as you’re not communist or anti-American, terms which are then defined so broadly as to cover a whole world of reasonable opinions.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

It’s not wholly unique in this kind of narrative self-delusion, but I think America’s relative lack of longer term history and ethnic identity makes the story a more central part of it’s identity. The pledge is one part of this.

This is exactly why the Republicans have been fighting so hard to whitewash history in our schools, they want people to continue to be unquestioningly loyal to the government, and believe the propaganda. You would think all the crackers in the South who want the Confederacy to 'rise again' would be against it, but it benefits them because it allows them to make slavery seem like it wasn't so bad actually.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's because it's very strange. Most of the rest of the world thinks we are insane for it We only think of it as 'a bit strange' because we were brainwashed into doing it as children.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm from a country which was under a Fascist dictatorship until 50 years ago - Portugal - and even though the place was a total shithole (so poor that it got Food Aid), the regime was massivelly into pushing Nationalism.

The Far-Right are usually the ones who love Nationalism (there really are no greater flag-shaggers than the Fascist Far-Right) and Militarism.

So, at least for me, things such as a Pledge Of Alliegance in schools in the US always sounded like the kind of brainwashing of children done in Fascist countries - maybe not as far as an organised regime Youth movement (like the "Hitler Youth" or the Portuguese "Mocidade Portuguesa"), but certainly partly in that direction.

[–] CuriousRefugee@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I know I'm in the minority, but I actually like the pledge, even if it's reminiscent of authoritarianism (and I strongly believe it should be optional). But that's because my interpretation was always "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USA, and to the [ideals and values of the] republic for which it stands." I viewed it as an affirmation of the commitment by myself to the "liberty and justice for all" we wanted, not as a statement of fact that no matter what the current leadership does, you should be loyal.

All that being said, I could see a contribution of the pledge to an environment of the nationalism or jingoism that led to MAGA. I just don't blame the pledge; I blame the leaders, politicians, media personalities, and individuals that drove MAGA to become mainstream.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The biggest problem is that kids are reciting it without understanding the words they're saying or the concepts they convey. When I was a little kid I was just repeating the syllables I was given, with no real idea about what it all meant*. Nobody should take any pledge until they can clearly explain what it means and what it means to them. And obviously a pledge should always be voluntary.

*Same as forcing a kid to go through the sacraments but I digress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I don't think most kids would pick up on that kind of nuance (or even most adults), but I agree there's a valid interpretation that you're pledging allegience to the Constitution – the Republic – and thus "indivisibility, liberty, and justice". That is: you remain allegiant to the Constitution. But the current pledge has so much wrong with it that it's cult-like.

  • Obviously get "under God" the hell out of there. Cold War-era reactionary trash.
  • There's no reason to assume from the literal text that what I said is true. Why not just focus on the principles?
  • It's a waste of time for kids to recite a dumb pledge they barely understand; granted they can't force you and a lot of schools IIRC don't do that anymore.
  • Even if the interpretation is true, why should this specific system of government be so glorified?
  • Get it the fuck out of there. It was introduced 100 years after the formation of the US by a Civil War officer as propaganda for children – probably paranoid out of his fucking mind after the South seceded. There's no reason kids can't learn to think for themselves when they're ready to actually understand these ideas.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They thought you knew that “all” was short for “all white people”

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All straight, white, land owning Christian Men.

[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

White men that is. Landowners. Rich white men.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

They had to cut the last two words when they added “under god” in the 1950’s.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Hence all lives matter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Speaking of the pledge...

First, why pledge allegiance to a "flag"? It's weird, right?

Second, they added the phrase "under god" later after the pledge had already been adopted. But they also say, "indivisible". If atheists are full citizens, then it cannot be both "under god" and "indivisible", because you've just divided people into atheists and theists in the words immediately preceding.

When you start to put all the pieces together, the pledge is a bunch of nonsense that isn't even consistent with itself. How can you even make such a pledge?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm a school bus driver and I attended a meeting of my local school board a few months ago. I was totally surprised when they kicked it off with the pledge of allegiance. I hadn't done it since middle school and I couldn't even remember which hand you're supposed to put over your heart.

It's fucked up. I would proudly pledge allegiance to the fucking Constitution instead.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't. Yeah it's a pretty great document all things considered, but it still has it's flaws. Also it took over 200 years to get it to sort of good. Remember the U.S. Constitution still allows slavery as a punishment for a crime, I'd never pledge allegiance to that.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Indivisible means the south best not try that shit again, while under God means no commies (ignore the fact that a socialist pastor wrote the rest of it)

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Was 'one nation indivisible' which they divided with god.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not meant to be logic - after all, it's targetting kids, who are hardly likely to challenge it and actually think it through like you did - it's meant to train kids to be Nationalistic.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey at least they weren't successful in implementing the one-raised-arm solute that the initial folks pushing for the pledge in schools wanted to see. That would've aged reeeeally well...

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, they did. But they ditched it after Hitler adopted it. Bad optics for our fashy loyalty oath, ya know.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

Well now that the Nazi's are in charge and they've gutted the Dept of Education, I wouldn't doubt if they started doing it again. They'll just add the words "My heart goes out to you" at the end.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

you were SUPPOSED to internalize the unwavering loyalty to a distant concept of authority, not the principles of mutual goodness and existing within a community you woke little shit

[–] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even in 1st grade in 1989 we used to say “and justice for oil”

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was in high school in the '80s. One day in history class we had a military recruiter come speak to us. After he was done the speaker said "any questions?" My buddy Rob raised his hand and said "yeah, I have a question: does napalm still stick to kids?" I'm still proud of Rob for that one.

Rob is a fucking legend. And the answer is yes.

Source: am vietnamese

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can't just leave us hanging like that, what was the response?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The teacher immediately said "OK no more questions" and that was that. Sorry, I wish this story had a better punchline.

For the record yes, napalm does still stick to kids.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

Well fuck Rob for being curious I guess. If I were his teacher I would have laughed my ass off and gave him an A.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

At least they didn't make you do it the original way, with the Bellamy salute:

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

How is that not cult behaviour? Sounds like indoctrination and grooming to me.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I was a bit edgy in high school and had to write a 1-page paper to the principal to be allowed to sit after refusing to recite the pledge lol

My 4 paragraphs where about the separation of church and state, injustice, my own freedom to sit, and how cultish it felt.

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

My mother just went to them and told them if they tried to make me stand and do the pledge she'd sue their asses and showed them the laws that already were passed at the time. She was pissed the teacher thought mom would side with her because mom knew the law. (Mom was an educator and worked at the school so that's why the teacher, being a colleague, thought mom would agree with her)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It still sickens me how in America children in school need to swear allegiance to the American flag all the time.

What the fuck is wrong with you? No wonder patriotism over there is so weird and cringeworthy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] onlyhall@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No no, liberty and justice for all [cishet white men]

[–] beveradb@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

There isn't even "justice" for cis white men though - justice in the USA barely even exists any more. The greed and corruption runs so deep that the supreme court are all bribed or heavily biased, so I have no confidence whatsoever in the judicial system.

I'm a cis white man, and I'm working to get myself the hell out of this utterly fucked country as soon as I can because everybody in power is blatantly corrupt and there are no functional checks and balances any more.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A Magazine Made Up The Pledge of Allegiance To Sell US Flags

In 1891, the magazine The Youth's Companion invited readers to write and ask for cards bearing the following message: "This Certificate, representing a 10 cent contribution, entitles the holder to One Share in the patriotic influence of the School Flag." When the enterprising tyke had sold 100 of these 19th-century NFTs, they'd send the proceeds to The Youth's Companion and receive a flag in return. That's about $300 per flag, in 2021 dollars.

And why were young readers so willing to put in unpaid hours as salespeople raising money to buy flags? Because of the campaign started by The Youth's Companion called the "Flag Over Every Schoolhouse" movement. They advertised this movement to schools directly as well as in their publication, and to really give schools a reason to want flags, the magazine created the Pledge of Allegiance.

The magazines' marketing department came up with the pledge, and had an on-staff minister to do the wording (though not the "under God" clause, which was added decades later). They got Congress's support, aiming to get the whole country reciting the pledge by the 400th anniversary of Columbus' birth. It seems like the magazine also did care about instilling national pride, but it was the subscriptions department who were behind these campaigns; the editorial department wanted no part in it. They sold hundreds of thousands of flags at what sounds like significantly above cost.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

A company trying to sell us junk being behind a thing that doesn't make any sense is the most American thing ever.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The more I learn about the history of American norms the more I'm realising it all starts with some early Corpo trying to sell shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›