this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
849 points (98.5% liked)

Uplifting News

16050 readers
256 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Siresly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 hours ago

Nice beavers.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

OK, so how about spending that money in a water treatment plant, so the beavers don't live in "dirty" water and make things better downstream?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

These eager beavers saved the Czech government $1.2 million

Do we really think that a beaver dam is the same level of safety/long term investment as a $1.2 million dam?

I get that they're trying to be clever or whatever with this headline, but it just comes off as more low-key "government can't work" propaganda.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do we really think that a beaver dam is the same level of safety/long term investment as a $1.2 million dam?

I mean, the dam is self-repairing.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 9 points 1 day ago

The dam is also environmentally friendly - beavers have been building dams in the area for 30 million years, the ecosystems are evolved to live with beaver dams.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you would be willing to build a home in a flood zone that is protected by nothing but a "dam" built by beavers?

The structures may share a name, but believe it or not, humans have innovated quite a bit to say the fucking least...

We'll build the homes in the flood zone, but only let beavers live there.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Safety? In the wild? I mean, a beaver dam doesn't need safety features because a sane person doesn't expect it to be safe to interact with a beaver dam.

Longevity, not sure, but at least it can be replaced by humans if it breaks at a later date.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Look at the comments in this thread. From a literal engineer... It's fucking dumb

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

What's dumb? A beaver dam, anti-beaver propaganda, or anti-government propaganda?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 73 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That image doesn't appear in the linked article. In fact, a simple image search suggests that the image is of a beaver dam in British Columbia and the picture demonstrates the ability of beaver dams to block/filter sediments out of water after a heavy rain. Why do people feel the need to make shit up when the real story is cool enough?

https://www.instagram.com/p/DKRW3j5Tmtf/

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

It was probably just the first result on the image search of "beaver dam aerial shot."

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 175 points 3 days ago (5 children)

How did they do this with no profit motive?

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 117 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 94 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

That’s the reason it was made quickly, efficiently, and works so well. No emails, no meetings, no AI slop.

I wanna be like beavers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (16 children)

They did do it for a profit motive. Through whatever instincts or thought processes the beavers had, they figured that they would benefit from damming the river. The dam creates favorable conditions for hunting, nesting, and storing food. These benefits are a sort of profit. Money is a convenient kind of profit, because you can easily turn it into whatever other kind of thing you want and you can store it for later use - and also it is convenient to talk about in economic terms, since it is uniform and easily quantifiable. But no one (or, few people anyway) want money purely for the sake of having money - they want money because it allows them to have other things. Food, housing, good conditions for mating and raising their young.

Sorry. The beavers were only in it for themselves.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So what you say is that Beavers are filthy little capitalists?

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

Yes and no. They are petite bourgeois. They own their own means of production.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, I just had it stuffed

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago

Unexpected Naked Gun reference

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 49 points 3 days ago

Those beavers just stole our jobs!

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I live in NW Ohio qnd have thought about how beneficial it would be for the state to revert a few hundred acres along the Maumee river back into a wetland. It would reduce loads if the algal blooms that devastae Lake Erie. Some natural wetlands and beavers would mitigate ao much of that, but the farmers around here are completely opposed to any such ideas

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago

We are the extinction event

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 12 points 2 days ago

Beaver: "Pay up!"

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago

Timberborn update looks sweet

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Beavers: It's what we do. Now clean up that dirty water!

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 31 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I guess the water could be dirty from sediments without it being unnatural or bad in itself. I have no idea if that's the case here though. In either case beavers are awesome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] klay1@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (13 children)

I just read the article. Good job beavers, and great story!

But it says nothing about dirty water. Just the image here does. Why was the water dirty, is there any info on that?

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

The article only says, "to address water issues." Maybe they read that to mean there were issues with the quality of the water.

But "water issues" probably more frequently means that the humans have issues procuring enough water, and so in this case they wanted a dam for a water reservoir.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We don't talk about the incident.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Bober, kurwa!

Beavers are awesome

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Humans: Bureaucracy is slow, we have to consult the locals, we have to check the geology of the location, ensure that construction and materials are up-to-standards, we have no money...

Beavers: Fine, we'll do it ourselves!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Humans: Put their trust in a beaver dam, and find out the hard way why regulations and bureaucracy exist.

[–] SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 days ago

Aw hell yeah, fellow beavers

load more comments
view more: next ›