this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
477 points (99.6% liked)

History

5865 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to History!

A community dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 193 points 1 month ago (1 children)

1914 artist: will carrying canes ever go out of style? No, of course not, that’s insane. It’s pants that are a fad.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't forget the great hat! I wouldn't want to be seen without one.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or the time consuming up-do

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And a pipe, only a buffoon would walk into a museum without one

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr 60 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So imagine this but with a 40% obesity rate.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00404-9

Dozens of new obesity drugs are coming: these are the ones to watch

Next-generation obesity drugs will work differently from Ozempic and Wegovy


aiming to deliver greater weight loss with fewer side effects.

The 1950s can still happen!

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Weight loss drugs don't immunise you against food though.

And usually the people who are on drugs for weight loss arent exactly close to the figure represented.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Weight loss drugs don't immunise you against food though.

The new ones like ozempic literally kill your cravings and desire for snacking, so in a way they do.

And usually the people who are on drugs for weight loss arent exactly close to the figure represented.

You'd be surprised at the figures of some of the people I see at the doctor's for weight loss drugs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Obesity in the 50's was more like 10-15%, today it's closer to 35%, but 40 is close enough.

Interestingly, the spike started in the mid-1980's, timed too closely to the low-fat craze to not make me suspicious, especially since that adds up metabolically.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, many products had (and still have) reduced fat but added sugar. Sugar belongs in desserts in my opinion. Eating fat doesn't make you fat.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty sure fat digests pretty easily for humans, while we are omnivores we lean more towards the carnivore side of things. Remember our big evolutionary advantage is our ability to throw things good and just keep walking, persistence hunting was our big fuck you advantage.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Another advantage that we developed later on is our ability to seamlessly shift from small to big team organizations, sometimes working without any apparent hierarchy. Gobleki Tepe is one of the prime examples of prehistoric cities

Too bad the world as a whole kinda stuck with super rigid top down hierarchies for the past 500 years

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're just not going to the right clubs.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago
[–] arin@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

I've seen some burning man attendees wear shit like this

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It seems like futuristic utopia fashion predictions always feature less clothing. Whether something like this or sci-fi like Star Trek TNG.

Maybe, they’re prescient shades of the coming global warming or people’s imaginations are just unavoidably horny.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Horny, nerdy, sci-fi writers.

Based on TV shows in the future everyone on the planet will wear the same jump suit and boots uniform or the woman will wander around in silk robes. The show Buck Rogers said everyone will wear spandex, especially the female officers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What I picture as future style now is baggy clothes and layers and maybe LED masks, and I can’t wait. I want a big flowing cyberpunk trench coat

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nah, since fashion has been cyclical, pretty soon we're going to bring back those big frumpy denim dresses with a long sleeve white shirt under them that got weirdly popular in the early 90's, and then bell bottoms are coming back for a third time.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 30 points 1 month ago

Well the first problem is we let the abrahamic religions control the media.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Processed food killed that immediately.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh. So, on another timeline, without WWII getting in the way, society just goes straight to Burning Man. I like it.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nowadays burning man is just like the tech bros corporate retreat, so if it’s today’s burning man we just skipped some steps toward technofeudalism

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 23 points 1 month ago

Its actually surprisingly on par considering the clothing at the time. The bikini came about in the late 40's and the miniskirt was around by the late fifties although the term had not been coined.

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sort of correct? At least the lady is pretty spot on, summer dress, short skirt. The hair is a bit extravagant but we did have more pompous hair styles in the 50s and 60s. The only thing that seems out of place is the bow but not by a lot

The guy is ridiculous of course. Well at least the outfit. Because looking at today's rapers with their crazy tattoos ...

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 26 points 1 month ago

Rappers. It's rappers. Two P's. Please. Rap per.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Its not remotely correct if you compare it to 1950 instead of 2025. In fact that outfit is closer to a 20s flapper outfit than anything, but then the flappers had short hair, not super-updos

The guy is just a straight up quasi-indigenous-esque look, which is pretty spot on for fetishization of that type of stuff that was prevalent at the time this was drawn (and thereafter)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

We should start dressing like that by the 2050's. We have 25 years to make the transition. It'll be hot as fuck by then, so the lack of coverings will be helpful for staying cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Why was a cane ever considered essential accessory? Was it related to needing a weapon?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

Class symbol with the added perks of beating the poors and mobility aid.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It's a device that can be made fancy and beautiful that serves as a weapon when needed, and is an assistive device for the disabled. We're talking 1914, so it's not the most disabled the men of the western world have been, but four years later will be.

And even without the war, you're in a time where there's no joint replacement, and there's a lot of people with injuries from industrial accidents and people who've had diseases of industrialization. You have the beginnings of recreational sport (a good way to get injured if you don't know how to prevent it) and not much other exercise except walking places. The newfangled "safety bicycle" is still a death trap by modern standards but compared to a pennyfarthing without pneumatic wheels it earns its name. Also there's no antibiotics so you've got a lot more people sporting a single leg than in modern times, especially if you're in America where veterans of the Civil war are still around at the time.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

I think navigating an urban landscape a century ago was just generally more challenging than it is now.

Having a stick to fend off rats, dogs, or livestock would be essential.

Also muddy streets, gutters etcetera, are easier to navigate with a walking stick.

Finally just carrying a cool stick around with you while you conduct your affairs doesn't seem terrible. I find myself kinda wishing it was still a thing.

[–] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why isn't a cane considered an essential accessory? We could all use personal lightsabers at all times.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Weapon, balance wet cobblestone streets, ease on your legs from a long day waiting on the trolley. Pick upreach device. Also, another thing for people to sell, i.e. hat, pocket watch, bracelet, necklace, etc... that's mostly what "fashion" and "fads" are, a new gimmick to sell and distract people from the horror of everyday life.

Seriously though, a walking stick while hiking is a game changer. I'm not talking ski poles, those are mostly useless outside light balance stuff. I do so much with my walking staff and have never had a fall or trip while on the trail. A third leg can be a godsend sometimes, especially in muddy swampy sections. Creek crossings are a breeze.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that's woodstock, so ten years off

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

They were off by a few decades. The 80's didn't want to let this guy down

I went downtown and saw people who looked like that

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Egad, a woman smoking? Such depravity does not bode well for 1950.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

But no tattoos or body paint on the women that would be too much!

Smoking indoors! Such depravity is not acceptable in 2025!

[–] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Spot on the predicted climate change.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 10 points 1 month ago

One thing I fucking love about this is the man's hat. Like it fits so well with his speedo/loincloth thing it is perfect. The artist probably had a lot of fun with that.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

With the genital hugging pseudo gym outfits a lot of people wear, it's not far off

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 month ago

Kinda fire. Is this suitable for the office?

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

The future is so disappointing.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't mind seeing Minoan sensibilities to come back into fashion.

I admire their child like optimism.

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Personally I feel his hat is unnecessarily large and the ensemble doesn’t completely balance as a consequence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Cruise wear

load more comments
view more: next ›