this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
61 points (69.4% liked)

Witches VS Patriarchy

1031 readers
534 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If we're not simultaneously acknowledging how the system also makes men feel worthless without sexual/romantic success, then yeah it comes off pretty misandrist.

Are we also forgiving men for saying they hate women because women's lib stripped them of the dignity of being a "provider" while women largely still expect them to provide? Not that I'm saying women's lib is wrong, it's certainly for the best in the long term, but upsetting the system affects all parties. Excusing resulting sexism on one side, but not the other, is itself sexist.

Why do we expect men to accept being hated for things beyond their control, instead of being treated as fellow victims of a broken system?

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a man myself, I get it. We've been living with privilege for millennia, and the system is almost entirely the product of that privilege. The shift to women holding power, or even self-autonomy, is very recent, and they still have an uphill battle. And at every turn, men continue to fight them for it.

And every single post on this community that points out how unfair life is towards women has at least one person going "but what about men? You say the system is bad for women, but it's bad for men too!" Which is a whole other conversation you're trying to force on this one. And the system is built by men, so it's still men who caused the problem!

Side-note, the system of capitalism has made it near impossible to support a family on a single income, so both man and woman (in a straight relationship) have to provide. Don't blame this on women.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't say anything about privilege, I'm talking about hatred. Why are men supposed to accept being hated for a system they had no hand in creating?

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...Privilege. The answer to your question is privilege. You have been benefitting for your entire life from a system designed and supported across the centuries by men, for men. You don't even realise how much you've been benefitting. Based on your first comment, you think a woman being able, or forced, to provide for herself is stripping you of dignity.

A rich man sees a poor man get robbed, and simply walks away. The poor man condemns the rich man for his apathy. The rich man argues "it's not like I'm the one who robbed you." But the rich man still isn't helping.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

Based on your first comment, you think a woman being able, or forced, to provide for herself is stripping you of dignity.

That's not what I think, and it isn't what I said. The "system" assigned gender roles: women raise children and keep house, men sell their labor to provide for the family. Women's lib has changed the parts of that system that degraded women, while quietly ignoring the privileges women had, like not being forced to die in the wars that were much more commonplace through those centuries, for example.

I have no problems with women having the opportunity to provide for themselves, in fact I was very explicit that I think it's good long term. The issue I raised wasn't the abandonment of gender roles, it's the selective abandonment of gender roles. Specifically, women who want men to fulfill the provider role while refusing to fulfill their complementary role.

Being treated as an unlimited ATM, with zero commitment or reciprocity, is degrading. I cannot count the number of women I've known who want to work and keep their money, but still expect men to pay for everything, while also being free to move on to a more exciting man the second the whim strikes them. That's a new privilege.

If we're going to hold all men emotionally responsible for the hate women feel because of the way some men treat women, it's misandrist to not hold all women emotionally responsible for the way some women treat men.

[–] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago

Slap Now, instead of defending yourself, I want you to sit back and listen to why the mistreatment I’ve received from others made me do that.

This shit is ridiculous 🙄 Well said on the “victims of a broken system” thing.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If women are allowed to say "I hate men" and we pretend it means "I hate the way men treat me" do you advocate for the same treatment of men who say they hate women?

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

I think you misunderstood the meme, it's not a moral license to allow women to make problematic generalizations like "I hate men" - it's clearly still problematic.

Instead it's attempting to explain where women are coming from, to provide context that women are reacting to a situation ... and yes, that situation is different for men, that's the whole point.

So no, when men say they hate women it's not coming from the same place as women, the situation is not equivalent.

[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think if a man was, for example, physically or emotionally abused by a woman, got PTSD as a result, and he got out of that relationship, and later said "I hate women" in private to other men and/or trusted women, I wouldn't feel great about that, but I would understand in that context why he would say it.

I think the rules change when you take the same language to the public sphere, including social media, especially when factoring in that women are in a more marginalized group.

But I don't want to get into that, out of concern for justifying society's irresponsible use of social media across the board. The thing I think matters more is that sometimes hurt people don't use perfect language, and in private conversations, you can better contain the fallout that can come from that.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I hate men/women/gays/ blacks/Jews etc..." BAD. Divisive. Inflammatory. Gendered.

"I hate people." GOOD. Inclusive. Gender neutral.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

If you say "People are the worst", nearly everyone will agree.

Say "Cincinnati Redheads are the worst", some may agree. But most will just kinda nod along.

Weird line.

[–] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Oh fuck off. Might as well just go around talking about how you're afraid of black people but it's okay because they commit the most crime.

This 👏 shit 👏 is losing 👏 elections and pushing 👏 men right.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago

Without trying to diminish the importance of this specific point about misogyny I would extend that this is true of a lot of statements that people reject or see as wild and out-of-pocket when they hear them.

Most of the time, people are talking sense according to what they've lived, and if it sounds crazy to you then you need to get more of the full story and learn about the context from them and why they think that. It's not always. Sometimes people are just nuts or hateful or w/e. But most of the time, if you dig into that "she's talking nonsense that doesn't make any sense" statement you will find some good sense in it. It might not be the end of the story but it's usually an important part of it. Most of the time.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are there actually any women in this subreddit? Or mods?

[–] LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep. The manosphere like to pile on this community to tell women they're wrong. The mod must be drowned in work I really feel for her

[–] ofnadwy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

I hope that one day you'll open your mind a little.

Men think its misandry because they've never been a woman. They dont experience the harassment or violence; and shockingly none of them will admit to perpetrating it..

[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is one of those areas that make me think social media was a mistake.

Humans exaggerate. Humans are sometimes imprecise with language, especially when they've been hurt. Humans aren't poised and composed 100% of the time. This applies to both women who have been hurt by men and say they "hate them," and the men who take the words literally. But social media kind of moved conversations that were once in private or semi-private in-person spaces out in the open. It relies on these misunderstandings to fuel retention time and boost ad exposure.

In those in-person spaces, you could feel really depressed and tell other women "I hate men" to mean "I hate how men treat me," and you'd have a really understanding environment and feel supported without bringing in waves of hurt, defensive men.

This post is nice, and it is wonderful when male allies read the message and not the words themselves. I hope more choose that approach in the future. But I don't think this problem will ever go away, not as long as we choose social media as the place where the message is sent. I will say I am more sympathetic about women here, since the "I hate men" declaration nearly always comes from a man doing something genuinely hurtful, whereas defensiveness over "I hate men" comes from taking the words too literally.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

taking the words too literally

That's how words work.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Words in a dictionary out of context, sure, but in a conversation we are using words to express ourselves and additional input such as body language is used to develop interpretation. The meaning changes in context and delivery. Common examples include sarcasm, hyperbole/exaggeration, double entendre, and so on.

A more developed example would be: When someone days "you ALWAYS do X", the truth that you don't is immediately obvious. That suggests they're speaking from a place of emotion and that "ALWAYS" can therefore be interpreted as "too often for my liking".

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but that's the thing, using generalizations are harmful when speaking about personal feelings. I would much rather hear "You did X, Y and Z and it makes me feel bad" rather than "I hate everything you do".

I always know where women come from when they say "men are trash" or "I hate men", but I can't say it doesn't hurt sometimes because my gut reaction to a generalization is "oh, they are so hurt they can't even speak on specifically what hurt them, so I guess I'm just trash for now until further notice"

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

"oh, they are so hurt they can't even speak on specifically what hurt them, so I guess I'm just trash for now until further notice"

The hardest part is not internalizing. They're trusting you enough to complain to you, so you're obviously not trash to them. It should only be, "oh, they are so hurt they can't even speak on specifically what hurt them."

[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

This just seems kinda sad and self-deprecating

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I agree, but only insofar as statements like that. I remember in 2016/2017 when I still identified as a man one of my friends would constantly say "kill all men" around me and to my face. It was really upsetting. Also listening and getting clarification is important because I do know people today that say they "hate men" and when they talk about it they openly say they're misandrist. I don't believe everyone saying they hate men are misandrist though. Language is messy. People use hyperbole. People shouldn't be beholden to the literal definition of everything they say, especially in the heat of passion. But it's also important to remember that not everyone saying that hate men isn't misandrist, even if most of them aren't.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just pointing out that if someone said "I hate black people" or "I hate Jews", you typically don't go digging for nuance in the hopes that they're not being literal, because even if they aren't, it's an incredibly fucked up thing to say and shows what kind of character the person saying it has.

[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I get what you mean here. I had friends who would say similar things around me before I came out, and I would also have conflicting feelings about it. Like, if you say that about men, and you think I'm a man, is that what you think about me?

But no, not really. I'd also remember that I was trusted enough to be there for those conversations, so it wasn't about me, even before they knew I was a woman too.

And yes, there are women who do have openly misandrist views. I'm thinking about the "political lesbians," figures like Andrea Dworkin who believe all heterosexual relationships (and therefore reproduction) are inherently anti-woman, or those who see female separatist colonies as the answer to all our societal problems. But these people are in the minority. Most women, most feminists, have reasonable views about men. So whenever another one of those "dear men" posts come out, I do have to stop and wonder why people give them the least charitable interpretation on the internet.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

lol, I said stuff like "kill all men" as a man before I transitioned. I fully endorsed misandry back then, it paired with gender dysphoria nicely.

[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She's out of line, but she's right """", trans, fire

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

😄 I definitely have worked on my view of men, transitioning has given me a chance to untangle my hatred of men from my hatred & shame from having lived as a man.

But yeah, one person in my life said that the only "sign" she noticed before I transitioned was that my feminism and anger against men felt unusually personal (as if I had been personally victimized by men), which was confusing to her because she thought I was a man.

Nowadays I guess you could say I'm in rehabilitation from my misandry. It's hard when men continue to victimize so many, but I try to remember it's a minority of men and that patriarchy is about a whole system of power that includes class, race, etc. and isn't just about gender. It also helps to recognize the ways patriarchy victimizes men, as well.

My education on feminism has grown significantly as a result of my transition, but I feel like I'm still in the baby steps in a way. Lots of work to do.

Thank you for sharing your experience. I think it's hard not to get at least a little misandrist when we're forced to live inauthentically, while being constantly associated with the patriarchy like we're one of them. You've clearly acquired a lot of wisdom over your journey, and it's nice to hear that your transition brought you peace and clarity.

I spent my entire life afraid of men, for a number of reasons, and worried about cis women being afraid of me for the exact same reasons I was afraid. While in the closet, I would obsess over looking as non-intimidating as possible and never felt like I could achieve it. At the same time, some of my best friends are men, and they're genuinely wonderful people. I'm not sure they would have become my best friends if I'd been born a cis girl.

If there's anything "good" that came out of my upbringing, it's that I got to see and better understand the best versions of masculinity too.

Ive been practicing bitchcraft for years 🧙🏻‍♀️