this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
1387 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

17449 readers
2496 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 128 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Just how much Tylenol is consumed in Japan?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago

New conspiracy theory: Tylenol actually does cause autism. But China figured out that autism is the key to a better society and they are pushing RFK to ban it so that we remain self-destructive neurotypicals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stray@pawb.social 7 points 2 months ago

Based on the latest Silent Hill, a lot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone 81 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I expect better of the rail network in America. This is a tiny network for the size country we are.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

These poor people have such a bad rail network that even their dreams are limited...

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 12 points 2 months ago

I felt that one as a Brazilian (govt literally went "fuck trains, cars are the future!" for ~30 years starting in the 1950s)

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

it takes me 24 hours to go by train the same distance it takes me to fly 1.5 hours. and the cost is the same. there are some problems.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 72 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] stray@pawb.social 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thank you. I was kind of offended with the other one for implying I would neglect a huge region.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

Nah, Idaho can get fucked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 31 points 2 months ago (9 children)

why do all tracks lead to Florida?

[–] LolaCat@lemmy.ca 116 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Its the other way around, there needs to be as many ways to get out of Florida as possible.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago

One reason for this is hurricanes are more frequent, and sometimes the notice level is too short to have safe evacuation from Miami through highway systems. There has been anger over deaths from evacuation, when a storm warning did not destroy as many homes as was "hoped"/feared.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

I think because it has large populations on both coasts?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

A bunch of individual reasons.

Chock Full-0-Sea ports

Nasa historically moved a lot of big stuff over rail.

Florida has a shit ton of Agriculture but a lack of raw materials

Tourism

It's flat as hell

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 13 points 2 months ago

Chock Full-0-Sea ports

Is really the big reason. Less and less portage is going through the traditional East Coast hubs of NY and NJ, mostly going to places like Louisiana , Texas, and Florida instead.

Historically Florida has always been pretty big on trains as well. In fact you used to be able to take a train from Florida to Cuba....kinda. You could take a train across the overseas rail line to Key West where they would ferry the whole train car over to Cuba.

We used to be an actual country that did stuff, and that's because we weren't afraid to do cool stuff with trains.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The train tracks are extra support to keep Florida from floating away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Thats a weird way to spell Chicago? 3 out of 8 tracks is far from all of them

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org 7 points 2 months ago

Lots of people in a pretty small area in relatively dense cities that currently drive or fly between the cities (technically called strong city pairings). There's also a pretty enormous tourism industry in Florida that captures much of the Midwestern US/anyone not going to California or Hawaii for their beach or disney vacation. Florida is also flat which makes for very cheap high speed rail. Note how the map goes out of its way to avoid the mountains out West.

That being said, I'm not sure this map is one of the ones made with serious city pairing calculations. I'm skeptical that Quincy, IL has a really strong draw for high speed rail, for example, and that long gap between Portland and Sacramento/San Francisco, while beautiful and filled with cool places, is way too sparsely populated to justify 6hrs on high speed rail. I think it's a sort of meme map that's been going around for years, though I wish it were real.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I assume the gray gaps are due to red states refusing to get on the Tylenol/Autism Train, but I can't believe, if the Autist Party were in power, they wouldn't insist on connecting ALL the dots.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's kind of weird too because logistically the northern border is the easiest place to expand rails: big flat great planes region, with both of the two largest rivers for ferrying in supplies, followed by a bypass around the bulk of the rocky mountains into Oregon or Washington State.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

It's about need. Like yeah, Chicago through the Dakotas is easy as pie, but the demand would be to seattle and that crosses two mountain ranges and the only stops between Minnesota and Seattle with much demand there would be at national parks.

Like yeah it would be awesome as hell and the American version of the CCP would absofuckinglutely have a high speed rail to Yellowstone and the badlands since they're on the way. But Yellowstone is past the start of the mountains and you need to connect all the way to seattle for it to be more than a vanity project.

The important lines are the NY-Chicago (land is dirt cheap for lots of it, mountains are small, and population is dense with several makor cities you can hit) and the west coast line (basically actually do California high speed rail, then extend it from San Diego to just outside British Columbia. From there the east coast line, something involving texas, or stretching the ny-chicago line is good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah this is clearly the work of Big Acetylsalicylic Acid

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I would think that Kansas City would be a bigger hub since it already has a lot of rail through there and is more central in the country.

[–] deceiver 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

for freight, not passenger rail, which is what high-speed rail is primarily designed for

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But dood. Put a USPS fishbowl-connected car on the end with a sorter working inside and prepping for each stop, and watch FedEx sweat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

As would I. There is an existing line from Kansas City to Tulsa to OKC that has been talked about being opened for passengers for a couple decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

My dumb ass thought this was a ticket to ride map for a minute.

[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 6 points 2 months ago

No, there are more routes in ticket to ride

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The most efficient would be 3 major east/west lines, Boston to Seattle, DC to San Francisco, and Atlanta to LA, connected by a series of north/south lines to form a grid. On the east coast, just extend the Acela down to Atlanta.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

You need to hit major centres and you need to consider common trips to be efficient. You’re talking about the most efficient per station but most efficient per passenger is going to look different. This image doesn’t see too bad and can still have branching lines.

[–] qualia@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah just get a slime mold to design it for us.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

The biggest concern with that setup is how inefficient it is to reach the Pacific Northwest region, LA is a serious bottleneck on top of being a common endpoint in and of itself. A line that goes straight to either Seattle or Portland from the Northeast simplifies things a lot.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that population distribution means that almost nobody is going to be getting on or off the train between Minneapolis and Seattle. The population of North Dakota is 800k, South Dakota is 925k, Nebraska is 2 million, Montana is 1.1 million, Wyoming is 590k, Idaho is 2 million. That's nearly a whole quadrant of the country with less population than the Houston metro area. If we're building trains, let's build trains in Houston and serve the same number of people with like a tiny percentage of track that it would take to serve the upper plains states.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago

Umm yeah...now we are autisming! Though I'm not autistic as a disclaimer.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 64 points 2 months ago (17 children)

Trains are a common special interest of people with autism.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Then I must be autistic then, because I love trains and dream of having high speed rail.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

It's okay to find out new things about yourself. 🙂

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Awkwardparticle@programming.dev 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I know two neurodivergent people that love trains, one is into models and the other trainspotting. They are correct too, trains are awesome.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Train Simulator players: heavy breathing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›